One there is no way a new Xbox is coming out this year and two like we need an official confirmation from Microsoft to know they are making one.
Um... Id rather be able to boot up the new xbox and have ALL my games, and not have to keep my 360 connected to have to play those XBLA games.Sheo_Dagana said:*looks at everyone making demands for backwards compatibility and the ability to port XBLA games over to the "Durango"*
Uh... why not just keep your 360s? Entitlement issues abound, as always... I'm not saying it wouldn't be great, I'm just saying it's unrealistic and weird.
If it's possible to change or edit the thread title, why not change it so that it's actually correct instead of keeping it sensationalist?kitsuta said:
The irony is strong in this one.I do not think that M$ would push out something this early but I have been wrong, before I did not think Bethesda would screw the pooch with Dawnguard for M$ bullshit but hey.GAunderrated said:Funny thing is this generation of console's have been so busy of running franchises and sequels to the ground that I can't even think of one exclusive game from microsoft that excites me enough to buy a new console.
Also I'm hesitant to get near a new microsoft console since its turning into a media hub more than a gaming console.
.Itsthatguy said:I was thinking something more along of the lines of XBox 360 TRIBiH-Kira said:And the official name will probably be xbox 360 triangle
And for those who dont get it
Anyone wants to bet it'll end up like the PS3? The advertised promises that were broken?kitsuta said:indicates that the console may be scalable or even somehow customizable by the user.
It's almost certainly because most of those assets/resources are going to be put toward emulating a RISC environment on CISC based hardware for the simple reason that emulating across instruction set architecture types is VERY resource intensive.CriticKitten said:So why would Microsoft screw themselves with bad design architecture, knowing that video games are extremely data-intensive programs that place a high load onto their processor on a rather consistent basis?
And this is why skepticism is always preferable to immediately believing every rumour you hear.thebobmaster said:It seems odd that a brand new system that is supposedly releasing in the next 4 months hasn't even been confirmed by Microsoft, doesn't it? Especially with the WiiU having been confirmed for over a year.
You might want to change the title, then.kitsuta said:We apologize for contributing to any confusion regarding this matter through previous coverage.
Kargathia said:Which is a beneficial side-effect, but hardly the single most important reason to include tv functionality.Druyn said:Naw, you're not thinking it through... they're offering a game console (or at least, we assume it will still play games... hard to say with all the other shit they're shoehorning in) that can also be used as a DVR so you can 'time-shift' (legalese for 'record and watch later') tv shows.
Doesn't sound like something they'd really be interested in... except for when those HDDs inside the start getting full-as-fuck (and people who own DVRs will tell you that doesn't take anywhere near as long as people think it will) and people want bigger and bigger HDDs... which microsoft will be more than willing to sell them at a grossly inflated premium.
Sorry, still adjusting to the new layout - your post was under the one I wanted, so I first accidentally quoted you, and apparently didn't remove it all.Druyn said:What? That's not what I said!