I know it doesn't matter much when it comes to performance. Anyway, I made a mistake. I was excited because I thought it was DDR5, not GDDR5. Apples and oranges.Strazdas said:Does not matter much really. this is more of a future gaming thing.
I know it doesn't matter much when it comes to performance. Anyway, I made a mistake. I was excited because I thought it was DDR5, not GDDR5. Apples and oranges.Strazdas said:Does not matter much really. this is more of a future gaming thing.
It isn't. And it's better that way because it will be cheaper, and you can use PS3 to play PS3 games. Why are people so obsessed with backwards compatibility? No one is taking your PS3 away from you when you purchase a PS4.VoidWanderer said:The only thing I care about for the PS4 is if it backwards compatible.
I was totally caught up in the moment. I thought the guy said DDR5 which made me excited like a schoolgirl.Alistair_Darkheart said:Adam Jensen said something in regards to it being more powerful then computers at the moment... total and utter rubbish, for system memory, timing is far more important and considering GDDR5 (seeing as DDR5 isn't out) has rubbish timings at the moment, I'd certainly be avoiding it.
yeah, it seems that way, i was fooled for a bit there as well.Adam Jensen said:I know it doesn't matter much when it comes to performance. Anyway, I made a mistake. I was excited because I thought it was DDR5, not GDDR5. Apples and oranges.Strazdas said:Does not matter much really. this is more of a future gaming thing.
NoI.Muir said:Will it be backwards compatible
Will it require constant internet connection
Are they going to be sued for implementing the possible one game on one console only scheme
Will they charge us Australians 3x the price
Do I have to sign up to too many things?
I don't see why it's surprising. I mean look at their console history...Notsomuch said:I'm surprised they named it the playstation 4. I wonder if it's going to be released as something else in Japan.Adam Jensen said:8Gb of DDR5 RAM? That's INSANE!
Oh god, this! I'm much more interested in my core gaming experience being improved. I want a more comfortable controller and better GUI, both of which seem to have been improved. The social aspects of gaming hold no interest with me.dagens24 said:Colour me jaded but I give zero effs about sharing and videos and blah blah blah; I just want to play my damn game.
Cooperblack said:The rumours that the PS4 would permanently require an internet connection and block used games have officially been confirmed to be untrue by Sony.
Here [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-02-21-playstation-4-does-not-require-an-internet-connection]
And here [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-02-21-sony-tells-eurogamer-playstation-4-will-not-block-used-games]
Interesting.
Ugh. What a sneering remark. The fact that they said this makes me believe that they are still planning an always-online system in the near future.From the first article said:"Social is big for us, but we understand there are some people who are anti-social!"
The rumor is, about $400. This is very reasonable. The only thing that stinks: get ready to pay another $400 for a Vita with proprietary memory card to get the most out of it.Cooperblack said:DDR 5 .. this is gonna be one hell of an expensive console.
I saw nothing in the presentation that warrants creating a new console that would require me to buy all of my games again in order to play them. Most of what they introduced for the PS4 could have been plugged into the PS3 with some software development. So all in all, we get a PS3+ that has slightly shinier graphics, so they can use the excuse to up the cost of games again arbitrarily (citing "development costs"), and it gives me the opportunity to rebuy any of my games again for the PS4, since it won't play any of those games that I already purchased. They don't care about the audience that it already has, it is concerned with the people that it doesn't have, and that is where their failing is.el_kabong said:So, what about the PS4 presentation made you think that this is anything but an attempted improvement for a core gamer audience? I didn't see any family-friendly commercials of a family with two kids, both parents, and at least one grandparent playing in an extremely white room. Maybe I missed something.Lord_Jaroh said:The gaming industry needs one of the big ones to fail in order for it to truly recover, and actually start making games for gamers again.
What I saw was a bold vision about the development of their console. Much of the stuff about the PS4 (at least, the first hour or so) was extremely impressive to me. There are several ideas that they have that are explicitly trying to improve the experience for core gamers and the gamer community. Do you think non-gamers love putting up and watching Let's Plays or walkthroughs? Why would non-gamers care that several developers from outside Sony had early and real input to make sure that they can have solid 3P support from both major and indy game developers? Casual gamers aren't the ones meant to be won over by their talk of streaming demos for every game or the ability to have automatic or instant game saves just by setting down the controller (by pressing the PS button, I think).
Those things are for gamers and if you can't see that they would be an improvement over current systems, you probably didn't watch the presentation (it's easy to misinterpret things when you only read highlights).
Some people like to have a clean living room, with one system under their TV, not 5. Some people also like technology to actually advance, especially when the companies show that they can do it, and then take that feature away, only to re-sell the games to us at an inflated price.Adam Jensen said:It isn't. And it's better that way because it will be cheaper, and you can use PS3 to play PS3 games. Why are people so obsessed with backwards compatibility? No one is taking your PS3 away from you when you purchase a PS4.VoidWanderer said:The only thing I care about for the PS4 is if it backwards compatible.
some people prefer a one system does all for their game archive. one system looks a lot more pleasent to some (me included) than having a PS2, PS3 and a PS4 surrounding your TV. its a preference thingAdam Jensen said:It isn't. And it's better that way because it will be cheaper, and you can use PS3 to play PS3 games. Why are people so obsessed with backwards compatibility? No one is taking your PS3 away from you when you purchase a PS4.VoidWanderer said:The only thing I care about for the PS4 is if it backwards compatible.