Upgradable Consoles are Just PCs for Peasants

Gatlank

New member
Aug 26, 2014
190
0
0
deadish said:
I tried asking about computer parts and shit on a computer forum once. No one was willing to explain anything. They just keep asking me for my price range ...
I'm assuming because your question was vague. When building a PC one important step is your budget or else everyone in that forum would be naming parts that would make you end up with a 10.000$ PC.
If you didn't told them how much were you planning to spend eventually they would ignore you or take you for a troll looking to make them waste time.
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
Gatlank said:
RaikuFA said:
There's just one huge issue: PC gatekeeping. It seems PC users LOVE to look down on anyone who wants to get into PC gaming but isn't tech savvy.

Case in point: my computer has been broken for a year and a half. Why can't I get it fixed? Cause I don't know what's wrong and the only guy who'll look at it wants $200 just to see what's wrong.
Where have you been going?
Because where i use to lurk/discuss that kind of behaviour is frowned upon and if you present your doubts or problems clearly you will find someone willing to lend a hand.

Considering the guy I went to had a business that was fixing PC's, I think it's safe to say he wasn't doing it for free. But $200 for just a diagnostic is outrageous.
He's ripping you off, plain and simple.
Exactly. That's why I didn't pay and refuse to pay.
 

Rebel_Raven

New member
Jul 24, 2011
1,606
0
0
KaraFang said:
Rebel_Raven said:
Right, coz I want what ever upgrade I get for my console to be obsolete in months, cost as much as a console, and so many other flaws, and I've got to worry if my console can play the latest games at full power or not. No thanks.

I'll leave that to the
<youtube=aDMsGl_XxTk>

Anywho, the article makes sense.
Problem is, that I don't think you're going to have long until, as a console owner, the "optional" upgrade very quicky becomes a required upgrade...

Oh, I'm sure that initially sony's "games will be made for PS4 1st with Neo enhancements 2nd" will hold true. Same for when they do and nail down the Xbox1 upgrade as well.

And theennnn.... the game developers will be "yeah, no, this game WILL need a Neo only, cause we can't DO this game with the power the PS4 provides." and Sony will just go "well, we tried purchasers and loyal fans.... now go buy a neo."

Unless they go the full PC route of giving console owners a full 100% employed settings screen to downgrade resolution etc... but then, buy a PC? Cause... yeah...
Well, like the article said, it's already happening. There's at least 1 game out there that will only work on the new 3ds and not the old 3ds.
Only a matter of time before it's more wide spread. But then again it's still somewhat reminiscent of new consoles coming out. Upgradeable consoles would just speed the process up to probably yearly vs every 4 years or so.

JUMBO PALACE said:
Rebel_Raven said:
Right, coz I want what ever upgrade I get for my console to be obsolete in months, cost as much as a console, and so many other flaws, and I've got to worry if my console can play the latest games at full power or not. No thanks.
Totally. Instead, you can buy a system that's years into obsolescence upon release, doesn't allow mods or personalization, has a fee for multiplayer, and you have to be stuck with for however long the manufacturer decides to keep the current gen going as technology pushes further and further forward. Don't worry though, you'll never have to consider whether or not you can run the game at max settings. You get one option, low-medium at whatever resolution and fps the developer has decided for you.

That is the point of a PC. You don't have to be held hostage by whatever decisions Microsoft or Sony think is best for you. No one asked for these updated consoles, it just screws over customers who have already bought one.

And I admit, I'm playing devil's advocate a little. I'm sure your statement above was tongue in cheek (I hope. Consoles are a great option for a lot of people who can't afford the (marginally) higher cost of a PC or don't have the interest or desire to make that their primary platform. I understand that, but it does make me a little smug when I see console manufacturers basically turning their products into mini-PCs. You could just skip the BS and buy a PC and be done with it at this point.

Also, I would love to finally see what this 4k PS4 is all about. Unless they got the Flash to run into the future and bring them back GPUs that can support 4k resolution reliably, that are affordable, there's no way they mean games at 4k unless these consoles are coming with an extreme price premium. Maybe video playback only?

Edit: There seems to be this opinion that to be able to compare your hardware to the game requirements is this complicated and technical art in which you need to simultaneously do calculus and read the tea leaves for signs from the PC gods. If you can remember what Graphics card, processor, and how much RAM you have, you're essentially done. Plus, system requirements are usually VAST. Minimum is typically a card from years and years ago and recommended might be from a few years ago to the most recent offerings. PC gaming has become so accessible and easy. If you build a PC with a new-ish GPU and processor you won't have to check system requirements. You PC will play whatever it is you want to play. The only reason to get anal and uppity about it is if you need to be that guy with top end hardware running 3 1440p monitors at 100+ fps. Actually, even then you won't have to worry about it because you know your hardware is top of the line. SO unless you build a PC and leave the GPU in there for 10 years, you're good.
Kinda sorta tongue in cheek. Mostly joking, though. I just am not a huge fan of pc gaming, but I recognize it's virtues, and have some envy. I've tried it off, and on, honestly. Had enough bad experiences to move on. My laptop's too weak to play minecraft. Torchlight had display issues. Some MMOs like Warframe were just too messy to mess with. Granted I'm on a laptop, here, and it's not an alienware or something like that.

With the way graphics are jumping, and the demands seem to be going to not play PC games at console levels it's bothersome.
Have they made universal GPUs, or are there still some divisions like games that will only work on AMC, or Nvidia?

If I were to build a PC I'd assuredly want to make it strong enough for it to be futureproofed fora good long time, but I'm too paranoid to think that'll work.
 

deadish

New member
Dec 4, 2011
694
0
0
Gatlank said:
deadish said:
I tried asking about computer parts and shit on a computer forum once. No one was willing to explain anything. They just keep asking me for my price range ...
I'm assuming because your question was vague. When building a PC one important step is your budget or else everyone in that forum would be naming parts that would make you end up with a 10.000$ PC.
If you didn't told them how much were you planning to spend eventually they would ignore you or take you for a troll looking to make them waste time.
I was not looking for a build, I was looking for information. A run down of the general structure of PC parts and important characteristics was what I was looking for - even pointing me to the relevant websites would have helped.

Parts are useless, I don't live the in the US. Part availability and price will vary. I wanted to make my own decisions with regards to cost/benefit.
 

Link XL1

New member
Apr 6, 2010
236
0
0
i for one welcome our new upgradable console overloads. mainly because if it pushing people to PC then maybe certain developers and publishers will get their heads out of their asses and remember who the master race is (not naming any names, microsoft and warner bros)
 

AzrealMaximillion

New member
Jan 20, 2010
3,216
0
0
And now introducing, The Sony Steambox. Just as pointless as Valve's Steambox, but its made by Sony so PS4 games only.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
Rebel_Raven said:
With the way graphics are jumping, and the demands seem to be going to not play PC games at console levels it's bothersome.
Have they made universal GPUs, or are there still some divisions like games that will only work on AMC, or Nvidia?

If I were to build a PC I'd assuredly want to make it strong enough for it to be futureproofed fora good long time, but I'm too paranoid to think that'll work.
Hypothetically, comparable AMD and Nvidia video cards should run games about equally well. And the manufacturers try to play leap frog with one another, so neither is in the lead for long.

Realistically, though, there's something of a trend for games to favor one or the other (as apparently happened with The Witcher 3 and Tomb Raider), though often its only apparent with proprietary software that has to do a lot of calculations, like hair and certain kinds of physics.

And (while I may be biased)- my sense is that Nvidia has been winning this war for a while. Occasionally AMD wins on price, especially where options that integrate graphics and CPU on a single chip are concerned, but Nvidia tends to be cooler, faster, more stable-ly, and with lower power demands.

Still, I haven't heard of a game that out-and-out refused to run on one or the other, beyond regular system requirements, in quite some time.

As far as a "futureproof" PC goes, I do think it's possible; I even think I've mostly succeeded for about seven years. But I did replace my video card and add some more memory at some point, and at 2.93GHz, my CPU is no longer quite up to the newest and shiniest. Still, it's had a pretty good run.
 

Allan Foe

New member
Dec 20, 2007
198
0
0
Callate said:
And (while I may be biased)- my sense is that Nvidia has been winning this war for a while. Occasionally AMD wins on price, especially where options that integrate graphics and CPU on a single chip are concerned, but Nvidia tends to be cooler, faster, more stable-ly, and with lower power demands.
Lifelong nVidia owner here, and I must admit that while performance-per-watt superiority has long been Green Goblin's unquestionable advantage, AMD is already loading its gun with the silver bullet that goes by the name of Polaris 10 -- a rather impressive architecture that manages to beat the competition on cost-efficiency [http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-10-launch/] by a wide margin.

And as for "stability"... It's possible that having several infamous design [http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1004378/why-nvidia-chips-defective] failures [http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-970-memory-issue-fully-explained/] and faking upcoming boards multiple [https://semiaccurate.com/2009/10/01/nvidia-fakes-fermi-boards-gtc/] times [https://semiaccurate.com/2016/01/11/nvidia-pascal-over-a-year-ahead-of-1416nm-competition/], while easily forgiven and forgotten by the mainstream user base, doesn't make a good impression on the corporate customers. (One can also bring up serious driver stability issues as recent as the 364.XX versions, but those things come and go for both parties.)

Also, allegedly, AMD has been pricing their chips much more competitively for the console market. And now this strategy is going to be extended to the desktop starting with the R9 4XX series. For the first time since my first GPU, the Riva TNT, I'm prepared to abandon the green ship.

===//===

ffronw said:
The idea of upgrading a console sounds good at first, but the reality is that it might hurt consoles more than it will help.
I doubt consoles will move to modular design -- historically modular upgrades hurt more than they helped, but the "next gen" release gaps may be shortened by making new hardware purchases more affordable with the help of some sort of subscription model. Even then, the advances in CPU and GPU chip design have slowed to a considerable degree, to the point where there may not be enough potential horsepower room for PCs to outpace consoles in a generation or two.
So, even as a mainly PC gamer, I'm not writing off consoles completely just yet.
 

Satinavian

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 30, 2016
1,724
679
118
deadish said:
I was not looking for a build, I was looking for information. A run down of the general structure of PC parts and important characteristics was what I was looking for - even pointing me to the relevant websites would have helped.

Parts are useless, I don't live the in the US. Part availability and price will vary. I wanted to make my own decisions with regards to cost/benefit.
I don't know, what happened there, but the internet is full of not very nice people.

OK : general rundown

- Case : You can use old cases without a problem. Just make sure your components actually fit in if you order them online. Especcially motherboards can be pretty big

- Motherboard : Basically sets a limit how much your PC can be upgraded. Make sure your other components fit and think over if you want to upgrade maybe 4 Years later or buy a new one. Also there have been some cheap bad motherboards so you might want to read a review before you buy a budget version.

- CPU : Basically computing power and speed. Actually not that important for many games. For a gaming PC you probably don't need the best availible

- CPU-Cooler : Buy one recommended for your CPU. Some people go for more powerful ones for overclocking but that is for tinkerers. If you buy package deals there will always be a fitting one included

- RAM : Important, but the easiest thing to upgrade ever. There is memory size but also type. The latter needs to fit your

- GPU : Really important for graphics and thus for AAA games. Newer budget versions are not stronger than a year old high performance versions. Make sure, motherboard and case fit. Make also sure your power supply fits. NVidia needs slightly less power but is more expensive.

- GPU-Cooler : usually included

- PSU : Really important. Make sure it is powerful enough for your GPU. Don't go cheap here, you really don't want insufficient power (and regular shutdowns) or accidents

- Hard disk : Some people use several of them. One fast expensive SSD for system and frequently used stuff and a slower one for the rest is pretty common. But one HD works fine as well. No important pitfalls.

- Keyboard and Mouse : no pitfalls. Newer heard of incompatibility here. You can use ones decades old

- OS : Well, probably Windows.

- Monitor : make sure one of your monitor outlets matches one of your GPU outlets. Should never be a problem. It is not particular fun to have a decades old monitor and a modern PC but it is entirely possible.

- Sound, network connectivity (adapter/card) : often included in other components anyway. If not, you need to add it




deadish said:
If I were to build a PC I'd assuredly want to make it strong enough for it to be futureproofed fora good long time, but I'm too paranoid to think that'll work.
Built my gaming PC more than four years ago. Have yet to get a game that doesn't run. Outside of bugs of course.

So .. "futureproof" should not be a problem, if you take care to buy a PC optimized for gaming instead of, say, office work, in the first place.
 

ASnogarD

New member
Jul 2, 2009
525
0
0
Its already been tried, and failed by a company that now no longer makes consoles, Sega as mentioned by orangeapples.
The MegaDrive/Genesis system tried the easy upgrade route and you ended up with a monstrosity of a setup if you wanted CD's and 32 bit processing... and Sony popped up and offered everyone the Playstation, well we all know what happened.

The kinect should of warned console manufacturers what happens when you have 'adds' to your console, very little software support unless the manufacturer wants to pay for the development costs of all the software as well.
Its simple, each 'add' divides the market base for the software developer who knows that if they support the add they are preventing the portion of the player base that didn't buy the add from buying the software.

Its also pretty obvious you will end up with a upgradable console, and the manufacturers will offer fully upgraded consoles every few years, rather than make a new console... and as already stated the price of the upgrades will be stupidly high (see Sony and the PS Vita's special microSD's ).

... hey who knows perhaps this will push developers to PC's, least they know the player base is used to adapting to get the software to work, instead of trying to work out how many took the upgrade and how many didn't.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
altnameJag said:
I'll believe a PC can be just as powerful as a console at the same price point as soon as someone can price one out without using ultra-discounted used parts or $10 operating systems they got from a guy selling bootlegged Windows codes on Reddit.
Not really sure what the issue is with using discounted parts. If there's a discount why should you not advise people to take advantage of it?

Price point isn't really the thing, it's an investment. You pay a little bit extra up front and then its paid for itself after buying a few full priced games, you buy 5 games and you've already saved $100. Not to mention steam sales and humble bundles where you can get 100s of dollars worth of games for peanuts.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,336
6,842
118
Country
United States
elvor0 said:
altnameJag said:
I'll believe a PC can be just as powerful as a console at the same price point as soon as someone can price one out without using ultra-discounted used parts or $10 operating systems they got from a guy selling bootlegged Windows codes on Reddit.
Not really sure what the issue is with using discounted parts. If there's a discount why should you not advise people to take advantage of it?

Price point isn't really the thing, it's an investment. You pay a little bit extra up front and then its paid for itself after buying a few full priced games, you buy 5 games and you've already saved $100. Not to mention steam sales and humble bundles where you can get 100s of dollars worth of games for peanuts.
If PC's get to use discounted used parts for the "better at an even price" argument, used consoles should get the same consideration. It's like saying a Chevy Malibu is cheaper than a Hundai Elantra because you can buy the Malibu off of Dave for a song, but you have to use the sticker price for the Elantra for some reason.

Sure, use discounted parts and bootleg software all you want, but compare like-to-like.
 

Neonsilver

New member
Aug 11, 2009
289
0
0
RaikuFA said:
Considering the guy I went to had a business that was fixing PC's, I think it's safe to say he wasn't doing it for free. But $200 for just a diagnostic is outrageous.
I missed the diagnostic bit when I read your other post. I agree that is to much, I can understand if someone asks some money for it, but 200$ is too much.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
altnameJag said:
elvor0 said:
altnameJag said:
I'll believe a PC can be just as powerful as a console at the same price point as soon as someone can price one out without using ultra-discounted used parts or $10 operating systems they got from a guy selling bootlegged Windows codes on Reddit.
Not really sure what the issue is with using discounted parts. If there's a discount why should you not advise people to take advantage of it?

Price point isn't really the thing, it's an investment. You pay a little bit extra up front and then its paid for itself after buying a few full priced games, you buy 5 games and you've already saved $100. Not to mention steam sales and humble bundles where you can get 100s of dollars worth of games for peanuts.
If PC's get to use discounted used parts for the "better at an even price" argument, used consoles should get the same consideration. It's like saying a Chevy Malibu is cheaper than a Hundai Elantra because you can buy the Malibu off of Dave for a song, but you have to use the sticker price for the Elantra for some reason.

Sure, use discounted parts and bootleg software all you want, but compare like-to-like.
I certainly do take used consoles into consideration myself. A used console isn't the same though, because it's been /used/. Okay most of the time it doesn't actually matter, but a graphics card on sale is still new, a used console isn't.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,336
6,842
118
Country
United States
elvor0 said:
altnameJag said:
elvor0 said:
altnameJag said:
I'll believe a PC can be just as powerful as a console at the same price point as soon as someone can price one out without using ultra-discounted used parts or $10 operating systems they got from a guy selling bootlegged Windows codes on Reddit.
Not really sure what the issue is with using discounted parts. If there's a discount why should you not advise people to take advantage of it?

Price point isn't really the thing, it's an investment. You pay a little bit extra up front and then its paid for itself after buying a few full priced games, you buy 5 games and you've already saved $100. Not to mention steam sales and humble bundles where you can get 100s of dollars worth of games for peanuts.
If PC's get to use discounted used parts for the "better at an even price" argument, used consoles should get the same consideration. It's like saying a Chevy Malibu is cheaper than a Hundai Elantra because you can buy the Malibu off of Dave for a song, but you have to use the sticker price for the Elantra for some reason.

Sure, use discounted parts and bootleg software all you want, but compare like-to-like.
I certainly do take used consoles into consideration myself. A used console isn't the same though, because it's been /used/. Okay most of the time it doesn't actually matter, but a graphics card on sale is still new, a used console isn't.
Ahh, there's the mix up. I said "ultra discounted used parts". I remember getting sent one of those bullshit "look how awesome this computer is, and it only cost as much as a PS4", and it had a $300+ dollar graphics card bought used off of eBay for $100, and a totes legit copy of Windows bought off of Reddit for $10 that you had to upgrade to Win10 quickly before it stopped working.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Next time, report your opinion without the overdone PC master race joke. It's getting to the point that people will probably just ignore you because of the attitude it conveys. Like, I know that it's not suppose to be serious, but it still reminds me of people who talk out of their ass. And when I meet such people, their voice may as well just be farts in the wind, for all I care. You should probably drop it if you want to be taken seriously.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
altnameJag said:
elvor0 said:
altnameJag said:
elvor0 said:
altnameJag said:
I'll believe a PC can be just as powerful as a console at the same price point as soon as someone can price one out without using ultra-discounted used parts or $10 operating systems they got from a guy selling bootlegged Windows codes on Reddit.
Not really sure what the issue is with using discounted parts. If there's a discount why should you not advise people to take advantage of it?

Price point isn't really the thing, it's an investment. You pay a little bit extra up front and then its paid for itself after buying a few full priced games, you buy 5 games and you've already saved $100. Not to mention steam sales and humble bundles where you can get 100s of dollars worth of games for peanuts.
If PC's get to use discounted used parts for the "better at an even price" argument, used consoles should get the same consideration. It's like saying a Chevy Malibu is cheaper than a Hundai Elantra because you can buy the Malibu off of Dave for a song, but you have to use the sticker price for the Elantra for some reason.

Sure, use discounted parts and bootleg software all you want, but compare like-to-like.
I certainly do take used consoles into consideration myself. A used console isn't the same though, because it's been /used/. Okay most of the time it doesn't actually matter, but a graphics card on sale is still new, a used console isn't.
Ahh, there's the mix up. I said "ultra discounted used parts". I remember getting sent one of those bullshit "look how awesome this computer is, and it only cost as much as a PS4", and it had a $300+ dollar graphics card bought used off of eBay for $100, and a totes legit copy of Windows bought off of Reddit for $10 that you had to upgrade to Win10 quickly before it stopped working.
Bolded for emphesis, yes, yes you did. Sorry, thanks for being patient and polite to enough to point that out >< I misread it as "using", but yeah, using that sorta stuff is always iffy.

I maintain what I said about it being an investment and you can get a good, lasting gaming PC for much less if you play the long game, but I'm not gonna use that that as an argument against used parts.
 

JUMBO PALACE

Elite Member
Legacy
Jun 17, 2009
3,552
7
43
Country
USA
Rebel_Raven said:
Kinda sorta tongue in cheek. Mostly joking, though. I just am not a huge fan of pc gaming, but I recognize it's virtues, and have some envy. I've tried it off, and on, honestly. Had enough bad experiences to move on. My laptop's too weak to play minecraft. Torchlight had display issues. Some MMOs like Warframe were just too messy to mess with. Granted I'm on a laptop, here, and it's not an alienware or something like that.

With the way graphics are jumping, and the demands seem to be going to not play PC games at console levels it's bothersome.
Have they made universal GPUs, or are there still some divisions like games that will only work on AMC, or Nvidia?

If I were to build a PC I'd assuredly want to make it strong enough for it to be futureproofed fora good long time, but I'm too paranoid to think that'll work.
Well to answer your question about GPUs, there are no games that are tied to either of the two manufacturers (AMD and Nvidia), though sometimes a developer will partner with one of them to utilize their unique software. Nvidia has Physx for particle physics and AMD has Tress Fx for hair quality. But even when a partnerhsip does take place the game runs on all hardware. I've never heard of a game only being able to run on AMD or Nvidia GPUs.

And as I said, if you build a quality PC now there's no reason it can't last quite some time. The only reason to upgrade is if your games aren't running up to your specification. Right now, since you typically play on console that's probably 1080 or 720p at 25-30 fps. If you are happy with that you can use the same GPU for just as long as a console cycle if not longer. But typically I think a lot of people get used to and really enjoy cranking up the settings and playing at 60+ fps, so they upgrade more frequently. It's all up to you. No one is forcing any PC player to upgrade components and your components don't just stop working once a new GPU comes out. That's honestly part of the fun. Getting excited about new hardware and then opening up your rig to tinker around, change parts, fuss with your cable management; it all leads to a platform that is uniquely yours. You get attached to it in a way you don't with consoles. If something happened like a flood or power surge and my PC was ruined I would be devastated. An xbox is an xbox but this PC is mine. Maybe that's silly but that's how I feel about it.