Honestly. I can't understand why people are getting so bent out of shape. It's not sexist, and neither is Ueda-san. It's like people have a programmed need to find something and scrutinize it and beat it like a dead horse. Could they have done pants? Yes. Should it really be a big deal what the gender (and it's actually sexist to try and derail ANY gender by constantly doing pro/cons)? No. Seriously, if Ueda was some scumpig, Yorda would have been some bimbo with absolutely no redeeming qualities.
So please, just shut up and think about things a bit before running your gobs off and crying "He's sexist!" "Japan's full of dominant male overlords!". It was a change made for artistic reasons, and I doubt he was actually trying to say "women are weaker than men, lol". For one, kids in general are weaker than adults even at the 10-12 range. And as some have pointed out, it would have been equally sexist if it were a change from "dumb boy" to "smart girl", something that I think both sides need to stop doing. This is why feminist get lampooned and men are called sexist; no one will stop with the "well our gender is better at x than the other is". It's like both sides want to always one-up the other. Sure, there are some truths; Women are inherantly more confident and tactful than men, and men are physically built to be the stronger of the sexes. It's only sexist to apply these truths and then deny that the opposite gender can't push past whatever limit they have. Women are capable of gaining great strength, just as there are plenty of smart guys who don't think with their dingdongs.
I agree that it'd nice to see more, nonsexualized female leads (like Samus before the Other M). But this whole thing has gottne out of hand. Yes, the comment was poorly made, but it's idiotic to blow it so far out of proportion.