That is not where elections are won. That is where elections are bought.
US 2024 Presidential Election
- Thread starter gorfias
- Start date
Ah, I would say that Biden and Trump do this frequently. Mainly due to the fact that they dont know what day it is and forgot what their points are
I think people here try to make posts short so other can read them. So sometimes you need to elaborate later. Which is what I think might have happened here as this could be seen as disingenuous. Or Avnger's using the wrong term
Eh, I had disingenuous originally then wanted to soften the accusation somewhat so added the unintentionally. I didn't really read back the full thing in my head afterwards. Probably should have replaced that, yeah. I blame being half asleep at the time
You blame being asleeply awake?I blame being half asleep at the time
Gay marriage isn't getting overturned... (Yes, technically, the judges can rule whatever the hell they want but they don't do that)
Because to be protected or not, you have to challenge/argue it, that was my point.
AGAIN, and AGAIN, and AGAIN, I've said numerous times that society changes and the way people can read the same words today is different than yesterday. We're past that point where gay marriage is now interpreted to be protected.
Some when some new technology comes out and is deemed protected by something in the constitution, some new protection isn't "discovered"?
OMG, I don't mean there's no reason for gay people to want to have lived together and all that. I said there's no reason why they would've cared for being married in the sense there's an official paper saying they're married (as what benefits would they get directly from that say 200 years ago? Whereas now you have some rather good benefits from that).
There's somehow still some sentiment that Trump won't be so bad. Apparently Trump himself disagrees since he pretty openly stated he's going to prosecute and jail people just for not overthrowing democracy and crowning him an illegitimate president in 2020.
fortune.com
Trump vows to prosecute those involved in 'unscrupulous behavior' this election
Just days ago, Trump himself acknowledged that he had indeed “lost by a whisker” in 2020.
Liars.
reason.com
www.foxnews.com
Why you shouldn't fret much over Russian election interference
Governments are always screwing with other countries' politics. It’s often ineffective.
reason.com
Russiagate story 'will not die,' journalist Matt Taibbi says: 'How much meat is on the bone?'
Investigative journalist Matt Taibbi reacts to the latest actions from President Biden's Justice Department to combat alleged Russian influence on the 2024 election.
www.foxnews.com
- Feb 7, 2011
- 8,399
- 2,859
- 118
- Country
- 'Merica
- Gender
- 3 children in a trench coat
No, the constitution is reinterpreted with that new technology in mind, and it's judges that are giving that technology a constitutional protection rather than the constitution conferring it innately.
So your approach is just: "I feel like it's unlikely"? Actual Supreme Court justices feel it can be overturned, and I think they have more insight into their own chances than you do.
Which it already was. Proving that I was right in saying that it wasn't protected before. So one wonders why you brought it up as if it disputed my point.
....which shows how it can be interpreted the other way again in future, which was my point.
You were the one implying that the Constitition itself protected things regardless of interpretation, and that the Constitution itself would stop the SCOTUS ruling against. You've now shifted away from that position, but nobody else has forgotten.
That's my time to comment most often, largely cause all these weirdos on the wrong continent.I should probably stop posting first thing in the morning entirely, I guess
The latest attempt at pure racist hysteria from the shared conservative brain cell is that black immigrants are eating people's pets. Just truly vile people who deserve to lose every last good thing in their life.
Last edited:
Tomayto, tomahto
1) It's not gonna happen. 2) Even if it did, there's a law that negates. 3) Can't we focus on things that would help everyone more (gays included)?
And that took you how many pages to finally get to?
Once certain things are decided/put in motion, there's no going back. You think black people should worry about slavery happening again?
OMFG, I said BOTH things happen...
Sorry, which law makes overturning Obergefell impossible, or preserves nationwide same sex marriage access if it is?
Of course we can. We can focus on other things at the same time. Of course, it's the conservative Supreme Court justices like Thomas and Republican legislators and governors who keep devoting time to arguing Obergefell should be overturned, so kindly direct your complaints to them.
"Silvanus didn't do my research for me quickly enough, so it's his fault I made a mistake!"
I think the US has already seen dozens upon dozens of Supreme Court decisions overturned by later Supreme Court decisions, and that the Republican Party and several Supreme Court justices certainly don't consider it "settled".
So. Several state Republican Parties have put forward 14 of the same fake electors who violated the law and their constitutional duty after the 2020 election.
And J.D. Vance has explicitly stated he would have refused to certify the 2020 election. Even after Trump has now acknowledged he lost (last month, at long last).
The Republican Party is about as open as possible now about violating the constitution in pursuit of staying in office.
And J.D. Vance has explicitly stated he would have refused to certify the 2020 election. Even after Trump has now acknowledged he lost (last month, at long last).
The Republican Party is about as open as possible now about violating the constitution in pursuit of staying in office.
Since the news that the debate has been locked in DJT media has been trending up. Its not consequential as the overall trend is still at the bottom of it's 52 cycle. I can only postulate, but I think it's "excitement". Like people are buying in, betting on Trump either "winning" the debate or garnering support. As much as I enjoy shitting on Trump I feel obligated to note this shift in attitude.
Im well aware this is what I look like
but mark my words the stock will beat the polling. Keep an eye on it.
www.nytimes.com
Sorry I can't post the whole article but essentially Trump has two choices here in 10 days. If he doesn't sell and he loses the election He will get almost nothing. The problem is he needs cash badly. Harris has spent something like 10 times what he has on the race.
But if he cashes out on Sept 20 that'll be a sign to his base that he expects to lose and they may lose enthusiasm to go to the polls.
I honestly don't know if Ill watch the debate. We don't live in a time where two candidates can really fiery philosophy debates. I suspect these two will talk past each other.
Im well aware this is what I look like
but mark my words the stock will beat the polling. Keep an eye on it.
With Trump Media Stock Cratering, Donald Trump Has a Decision to Make
A lockup provision has kept him from being able to sell Trump Media shares. With that prohibition about to expire, the price is down more than 70 percent from its peak.
Sorry I can't post the whole article but essentially Trump has two choices here in 10 days. If he doesn't sell and he loses the election He will get almost nothing. The problem is he needs cash badly. Harris has spent something like 10 times what he has on the race.
But if he cashes out on Sept 20 that'll be a sign to his base that he expects to lose and they may lose enthusiasm to go to the polls.
I honestly don't know if Ill watch the debate. We don't live in a time where two candidates can really fiery philosophy debates. I suspect these two will talk past each other.
I live in Ohio; if someone could get rid of all of those annoying Canadian geese, I would be for it.
Found the source:
Things you see while driving in CBUS : r/Columbus (reddit.com)
Edit2:
America Did Too Good a Job at Saving Canada Geese - The Atlantic
Not a fan of the geese shit on your lawn protection act.
Last edited:
They keep forgetting that Harris is the one who will be certifying the election...
- Feb 7, 2011
- 8,399
- 2,859
- 118
- Country
- 'Merica
- Gender
- 3 children in a trench coat
Not really.
Saying it was "discovered" makes it sound like it's out of the justice's hands. "Oops, we found out that the Constitution has actually said something completely different all this time, and now we have to follow it, it's not up to us."
When it's actually a reinterpretation and is squarely in the hands of the supreme court. The justices are intentionally choosing to interpret the constitution in a different way than it was in the past, often in the furtherance of their own goals and beliefs.