US 2024 Presidential Election

Recommended Videos

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
8,560
1,009
118
Country
USA
Trump wanted them to enter the house the stop the vote. Ending the democratic process was the plan. It was disorganised and co-opted by fundamentalists when Trump was blocked from joining him

What you are talking about is Trump having a terrible plan. Just because Trump's plan was illegal and disorganised doesnt stop it from being the plan. See also: Tarrifs, DOGE, Trade War, Iran War and ICE. Trump does not even understand what NATO is or what a tarrif is or the term war means. He keeps making up his own definitions and then wonders why the rest of the world does not follow suit. Jan 6 was a mess becuase Trump's plan was stupid, illegal and disorganised. He got a lot of innocent people to break the law
See, this is conspiracy theory. I know you understand what right wingers look like when they talk about crazy conspiracies. That's what you look like right now.
 

Agema

Overhead a rainbow appears... in black and white
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
10,984
7,945
118
When the truth looks like a joke to you, you can be assured that what you think is true is comically wrong.
Do you think I'd be a Republican because I believe in a robust and supportive welfare system and universal healthcare, taxing the rich to pay for it? Is it my belief in improved labour rights and greater corporate regulation? My support for environmental policy, women's right to abortion, transgender rights, immigration?

There's an evidence base that you've been reading and interacting with it for all these years. Somehow you haven't noticed my positions on major policy issues would make the Republican Party anathematic?

Instead you're making weird and indirect appeals to my political positions relative to the tiny population of an international computer game debate forum, as if it were representative of US society. In many ways, it's a perfect distillation of they way that, like many amateurs and bullshitters, you think your rationalisation takes precedence over evidence.

That tells us all we need to know about where you stand on "truth".
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
8,560
1,009
118
Country
USA
Do you think I'd be a Republican because I believe in a robust and supportive welfare system and universal healthcare, taxing the rich to pay for it? Is it my belief in improved labour rights and greater corporate regulation? My support for environmental policy, women's right to abortion, transgender rights, immigration?
No, but none of those are core to who you are, all of those things are downstream. You are a rational person, for the most part, and reasoned positions are consequential to the information you have and the circumstance you are in. I can see how you apply reason to your circumstances, and understand how that same sort of reasoning would apply if you were somewhere else. You are not dogmatic about a single one of those positions.
 

XsjadoBlayde

~ just another dread messenger & artisanal kunt ~
Apr 29, 2020
3,892
3,988
118
Before consent gets entirely manufactured (oh dear Chomsky you really fucked yourself over with that book title didn't you lol) some history contexts that aren't provided cos they're not geopolitically convenient for colonialsm.

Robert sits down with Dr. Kaveh Hoda to discuss the first Shah of Iran. (2 Part Series)
If you a chump that still gets ads heh...
Add skip 10:18
Add skip 2 36:29
Add skip 3 1:04:52
Enjoy this in-depth historical documentary about Cuba. It covers Spanish colonization, U.S. neocolonialism, Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, the Cuban Revolution and its success, Cuba’s role in Angola, its medical internationalism, how the U.S. has sabotaged the island, the blockade,

and more. My Weekly Podcast: @nopoliticherepodcast
SOURCES BELOW ER

Timestamps:
0:00 The Spectrum of Opinions About Cuba
5:32 What Is This Video's Goal?
7:55 Part 1: Spanish Colonization of Cuba
15:14 Part 2: U.S. Neocolonial Control of Cuba
17:51 The Rise of Fulgencio Batista
19:39 Part 3: The Cuban Revolution of 1959
28:57 Part 4: Post-Revolutionary Cuba & It's Many Achievements
36:34 How Cuba's Democracy Works
42:57 Part 5: U.S. Aggression & Cuban Selflessness
44:18 Castro’s Nationalizations
54:45 The Severity of the Cuban Embargo Explained
56:30 Cuba’s Medical Internationalism

CORRECTION: At 36:00 the text should say "1981-1984" - The graphics contain an error.

SOURCES:
- Cuba: A New History - R. Gott
- America, America - G. Grandin
- A History of the Cuban Revolution - A. Chomsky
- Central America’s Forgotten History - A. Chomsky
- Cuba: Between Reform & Revolution - L. A. Perez
- Open Veins of Latin America - E. Galeano
- We Are Cuba! - H. Yaffe
- Cuba & Its Neighbours - A. August
- Che Guevara: A Revolutionary Life - J. L. Anderson
- The Economic War Against Cuba - S. Lamrani
- An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States - R.D. Ortiz
- On Cuba - V. Prashad & N. Chomsky
- Guevara, Also Known As Che - P. I. Taibo II
- How the Workers’ Parliaments Saved the Cuban Revolution - P. Ross
- The Cuban Nationalization of US Property in 1960: the Historical and Global Context - C. Mckelvey
- Killing Hope - W. Blum
- African Stalingrad - I. Saney
 

Agema

Overhead a rainbow appears... in black and white
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
10,984
7,945
118
No, but none of those are core to who you are, all of those things are downstream. You are a rational person, for the most part, and reasoned positions are consequential to the information you have and the circumstance you are in. I can see how you apply reason to your circumstances, and understand how that same sort of reasoning would apply if you were somewhere else. You are not dogmatic about a single one of those positions.
So you're not talking about the real me, then.
 

Gergar12

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
4,942
991
118
Country
United States

So much for a free market. Ain't ain't that right Trump suckers?
Biden and Trump also did this with Chinese EVs, both parties want to have their cake, and eat it too by not allowing competition in, but not innovating enough/putting R&D into physical goods to make it worth it. Had we had these leaders in the Cold War the USSR would have lasted to 2021 if not longer.

Thank the UAW for that, and other unions for that. Also the lobbyist and the rich.
 

Agema

Overhead a rainbow appears... in black and white
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
10,984
7,945
118
Biden and Trump also did this with Chinese EVs, both parties want to have their cake, and eat it too by not allowing competition in, but not innovating enough/putting R&D into physical goods to make it worth it. Had we had these leaders in the Cold War the USSR would have lasted to 2021 if not longer.
It's not really that.

The USA is incredibly R&D rich. Remember that it was the manufacturing it moved abroad, not the R&D and IP. China might be making a lot of these products, but they're still US-designed, although China will also benefit from synergistic links between the making and designing with the manufacturing.

The USA's problem is that it just doesn't have the population to support much more. The USA has what, 4% unemployment? It doesn't have enough spare workers without either sucking employment out of sectors the USA might need or want more, or mass immigration. The USA has about 330 million people who need to do a range of jobs, so as a society it can support a certain amount of scientists / engineers / factory workers. China has a population of around 1400 million people. That's a lot more people to invent and design stuff, and in the end that people power is going to count.

The USA can selectively try to force some industry to be done at home, but the inevitability is that this will be inefficient and wasteful. Industries tend to go to places with comparative advantage, where it's cheaper to get the job done. Forcing an industry into a place it's not suited is wasting money, whether through subsidies or increased consumer costs. Don't get me wrong, there are good reasons countries might want to force some R&D / manufacturing to occur in their country for national security reasons, but it needs to be carefully selective.

What the USA probably needs to do is prioritise areas where it has competitive advantage. In a sense, you can see this logic in it pursuing AI so hard: the USA is still the world leader in tech, and it does at least make sense to leverage that and keep that ball rolling. It's given up on renewable power, and it increasingly looks like it's car industry is about to be swept away.
 

Agema

Overhead a rainbow appears... in black and white
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
10,984
7,945
118
I believe the word "if" at the top of this tangent established that.
And what, exactly, do you hope to achieve with the logic "If I imagine you as a different person, the imaginary you would be a different person"?
 

Gergar12

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
4,942
991
118
Country
United States
It's not really that.

The USA is incredibly R&D rich. Remember that it was the manufacturing it moved abroad, not the R&D and IP. China might be making a lot of these products, but they're still US-designed, although China will also benefit from synergistic links between the making and designing with the manufacturing.

The USA's problem is that it just doesn't have the population to support much more. The USA has what, 4% unemployment? It doesn't have enough spare workers without either sucking employment out of sectors the USA might need or want more, or mass immigration. The USA has about 330 million people who need to do a range of jobs, so as a society it can support a certain amount of scientists / engineers / factory workers. China has a population of around 1400 million people. That's a lot more people to invent and design stuff, and in the end that people power is going to count.

The USA can selectively try to force some industry to be done at home, but the inevitability is that this will be inefficient and wasteful. Industries tend to go to places with comparative advantage, where it's cheaper to get the job done. Forcing an industry into a place it's not suited is wasting money, whether through subsidies or increased consumer costs. Don't get me wrong, there are good reasons countries might want to force some R&D / manufacturing to occur in their country for national security reasons, but it needs to be carefully selective.

What the USA probably needs to do is prioritise areas where it has competitive advantage. In a sense, you can see this logic in it pursuing AI so hard: the USA is still the world leader in tech, and it does at least make sense to leverage that and keep that ball rolling. It's given up on renewable power, and it increasingly looks like it's car industry is about to be swept away.
That's how hegemonic powers die. Every single empire has been a hybrid economic power who do many things well. Plus we could immigrate more people in from like everywhere. And you need physical industry like cars, semi-conductors, high quality composites materials, and etc.

The fact that the last four administrations didn't see this until somewhat now is borderline traitorous. Without American car companies the US wouldn't have won World War 2. Trump got rid of the EV subsidy, Biden loved non-dynamic companies that make stuff the world doesn't want to buy, Obama ax the F-22 and didn't subsidized battery, and solar production. George W Bush exists.

Edit: Furthermore lots of people in the US are working at like Starbucks, McDonald and Walmart. We need less people there, and more people who can design in say Auto-Cad or Solid-works or any 3D designer a part of a automated factories. Underemployment, and under-utilization of labor is massive in the US.
 

Dirty Hipsters

This is how we praise the sun!
Legacy
Feb 7, 2011
9,039
3,716
118
Country
'Merica
Gender
3 children in a trench coat
No, but none of those are core to who you are, all of those things are downstream. You are a rational person, for the most part, and reasoned positions are consequential to the information you have and the circumstance you are in. I can see how you apply reason to your circumstances, and understand how that same sort of reasoning would apply if you were somewhere else. You are not dogmatic about a single one of those positions.
All of those things make him sound even less like a Republican.
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
8,560
1,009
118
Country
USA
All of those things make him sound even less like a Republican.
Then you are severely not paying attention.
And what, exactly, do you hope to achieve with the logic "If I imagine you as a different person, the imaginary you would be a different person"?
You're not clowning on me, you're clowning on reason itself, and thus all of your own positions.
 

XsjadoBlayde

~ just another dread messenger & artisanal kunt ~
Apr 29, 2020
3,892
3,988
118
There's a really good interview with a Cuban journalist in this episode, plus lot of talk about the current experience of living under American (intentional) economic strangling

We talk about the effects of the American blockade in Cuba and interview Cuban journalist Daniel Montero from Belly of the Beast.

https://www.bellyofthebeastcuba.com/

Maybe soon YouTube will have the full audio upload, but for now it's just available in podcast format, such limitations for sharing undercut how compelling and sadly needed it is



Over 3 hours of Epstein's taste in movies but also connections and attempted connections to the industry (hey the guy is intimately tied to, and woven throughout the current president's life n personality, it still counts!)
Emerson Rosenthal and Jon Dieringer join us for a mega-episode on Epstein’s connections to Hollywood, his personal taste in movies, and how Oscars campaigns helped him operate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
34,811
14,273
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
Nazi being Nazis


Trump being angry biatch again and going after Cuba this time.



 
Last edited: