- Feb 7, 2011
- 9,061
- 3,739
- 118
- Country
- 'Merica
- Gender
- 3 children in a trench coat
US 2024 Presidential Election
- Thread starter gorfias
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Not the intended target; more like a "target of opportunity".
Trump will let bipartisan housing bill become law without signing in protest over GOP voter ID law
President Donald Trump has chosen not to sign a sweeping housing affordability bill on Friday, in protest of Congress not approving a strict voter ID bill that does not have enough support to pass.
apnews.com
Trump, in his zeal to ensure a free and fair election, demolishes a commission meant to ensure a free and fair election.
www.theguardian.com
He knows that if all Americans vote, the Republicans will be wiped out, and Democrats will impeach him, and then he'll be on the hook for all his crimes. Better to destroy democracy than allow that!
Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’
Bipartisan Election Assistance Commission maintains mail-voter registration form, among other duties
www.theguardian.com
He knows that if all Americans vote, the Republicans will be wiped out, and Democrats will impeach him, and then he'll be on the hook for all his crimes. Better to destroy democracy than allow that!
Only way it would is if they got 2/3 in both houses and it was made very clear the public will primary their collective asses unless it happens.
Trump has declared that the United States is the "guardian" of the Hormuz Strait, and that he is seeking to collect fees "at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped".
www.cnbc.com
Remember when we called this kind of thing a protection racket?
Trump proposes 20% toll on cargo through Strait of Hormuz; restarts Iran blockade
The Strait of Hormuz is a major oil shipping route and the epicenter of the U.S. and Israel's ongoing war with Iran.
www.cnbc.com
Remember when we called this kind of thing a protection racket?
I love this story, cause the contradiction is so blatant. How do we know there are so many cases if they stopped tracking it?
"They rearranged some departments and made certain reporting optional! We'll never know when dseases start spreading."
Disease starts spreading, cases are known and reported prominently.
"See! They broke the tracking! We have no idea there are thousands of cases! These thousands of cases are the evidence!"
Who framed the changes made under RFK leadership in those terms?
Nobody, because the people complaining have not bothered to find out what was changed before complaining.
...so you are offering up a caricature of something that you yourself do not think even exists to motivate a "blatant" contradiction.
Last edited:
No fucking shit. People who holds this man up as a profit are going to hell and burning with them. A false coin for a false god.
I am articulating the implication made by juxtaposing the change in reporting standards to the spread of this parasite. If nobody spells out the details, a vague "government entity changed standards and now a parasite is spreading" seems pretty obvious. If you spell out the details, the contradiction arises. The standard that was changed is not how they manage an event like this, only what gets reported. This outbreak is getting thoroughly reported by the CDC, making it a contradiction to use this as evidence that the system was broken.