Valve "Confirms" Linux for Steam Box

UNHchabo

New member
Dec 24, 2008
535
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Valve big dog Gabe Newell said in July 2012 that bringing a meaningful selection of games to Linux could help make it a serious competitor to Windows, but resistance [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/118812-GNU-Project-Founder-Calls-Steam-on-Linux-Unethical] to the idea came from a rather unexpected source: Free Software Foundation and GNU Project founder Richard Stallman, who said that the advent of closed-source, non-free games on Linux are "unethical because they deny freedom to their users."
It comes as no surprise to anyone who's involved in the Free-and-Open-Source-Software (FOSS) community; Richard Stallman is so devoted to the cause that he uses a machine with an open-source BIOS. He sees the use of non-free software on a Linux system as morally wrong.
 

UNHchabo

New member
Dec 24, 2008
535
0
0
Beryl77 said:
The only way I can see this to be successful is if many developers are willing to port their games to Linux, which is unlikely I'd say. My only worry about this is that it won't have many games, sure the Valve games will definitely work on this and maybe a few others but I doubt it will even come close to the next PS or Xbox.
When Steam first started supporting OSX, only a few games were supported. Since they provided the platform, many developers have taken advantage of that. I imagine the same will become increasingly true after Valve adds Linux support.

Even today, you can browse Steam and look at the games available for Mac [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/mac/] and Linux [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/linux/].
 

Ed.

New member
Jan 14, 2010
138
0
0
anything on the unreal or unity engines can port across easy enough, also mac and WiiU use open GL and openAL so make your game in that and your most of the way to PC/ Mac/ linux/ nintendo. If sony are clever and jump on this standard they could all leave the next Xbox in the position of being a pain in the backside to port onto.

Also whats stoping them from having android stuff on there? it's a Java VM right? They could potentaly snipe the oyaa libary.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
RhombusHatesYou said:
albino boo said:
However you can use openGL on both OS's but that would require Valves rivals to port to opengl from directX.
Like they do for the PS3? You're right, they'd never do that.
Sony isn't a rival to EA and Activision where as Valve is. Why would a company spend money to make a rival richer?

UNHchabo said:
Beryl77 said:
The only way I can see this to be successful is if many developers are willing to port their games to Linux, which is unlikely I'd say. My only worry about this is that it won't have many games, sure the Valve games will definitely work on this and maybe a few others but I doubt it will even come close to the next PS or Xbox.
When Steam first started supporting OSX, only a few games were supported. Since they provided the platform, many developers have taken advantage of that. I imagine the same will become increasingly true after Valve adds Linux support.

Even today, you can browse Steam and look at the games available for Mac [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/mac/] and Linux [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/linux/].
That is 342 games for Mac out of 1856 games on steam (all excluding dlc) so that is only 18%. For Linux its 38 out of 1856, which works out at 2%. Hardly a stampede.
 

Beryl77

New member
Mar 26, 2010
1,599
0
0
UNHchabo said:
Beryl77 said:
The only way I can see this to be successful is if many developers are willing to port their games to Linux, which is unlikely I'd say. My only worry about this is that it won't have many games, sure the Valve games will definitely work on this and maybe a few others but I doubt it will even come close to the next PS or Xbox.
When Steam first started supporting OSX, only a few games were supported. Since they provided the platform, many developers have taken advantage of that. I imagine the same will become increasingly true after Valve adds Linux support.

Even today, you can browse Steam and look at the games available for Mac [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/mac/] and Linux [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/linux/].
It's true that there are quite a few mac games on Steam now but even though there are some AAA games on it, the big majority of the games are small Indie games. I suspect the same will happen with the Steambox. I'm not saying those games are bad or anything like that but most probably want to buy it for the big games. I don't think I'd buy a console just to play some Indie games, unless it won't cost more than around $100, which I doubt will be the case. Again, this isn't a critique against Indie games, I own quite a few myself but I just don't see many people buying it for those and very few AAA games.
The only thing that could make this a possible success is Valve's good name among gamers but I'm not sure that's enough here.

If I could play most games from my Steam library on this, I'd buy it immediately.
 

poiuppx

New member
Nov 17, 2009
674
0
0
Calling it now; they go in heavy with this, the launch title will be Half Life 3. You KNOW that alone will make the install base psychotically massive. Instant profit factor.
 

UNHchabo

New member
Dec 24, 2008
535
0
0
albino boo said:
UNHchabo said:
Beryl77 said:
The only way I can see this to be successful is if many developers are willing to port their games to Linux, which is unlikely I'd say. My only worry about this is that it won't have many games, sure the Valve games will definitely work on this and maybe a few others but I doubt it will even come close to the next PS or Xbox.
When Steam first started supporting OSX, only a few games were supported. Since they provided the platform, many developers have taken advantage of that. I imagine the same will become increasingly true after Valve adds Linux support.

Even today, you can browse Steam and look at the games available for Mac [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/mac/] and Linux [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/linux/].
That is 342 games for Mac out of 1856 games on steam (all excluding dlc) so that is only 18%. For Linux its 38 out of 1856, which works out at 2%. Hardly a stampede.
Yeah, but both of those categories are getting larger each day, and every time new games come out, a larger proportion of them are supported on the other two platforms. Based on the New Releases and Top Sellers lists, the proportion of new titles supported on Mac looks to be more like 30%.

A crowd draws a crowd; if Valve supports Linux, more people will use Linux, which will draw more developers to support it.
 

Lucky Godzilla

New member
Oct 31, 2012
146
0
0
Aaaaaand there goes my purchase.
I have nothing against linux, but were I to buy a "steambox" I'd prefer if at least 90% of my already purchased games would run on the damn thing in the first place.
 

Entitled

New member
Aug 27, 2012
1,254
0
0
I'm pretty sure that if this is a PC, then you can just install Windows 7 on it along with the pre-installed Linux.
 

Doom972

New member
Dec 25, 2008
2,312
0
0
Bostur said:
albino boo said:
I think its going to be a mistake. Valves commercial rivals are not going to port their games to Linux to aid the profitability of Gabe. Its going to have valves games and a few indie titles but that's about it. Steam presence on a platform does not make it instantly the gaming mainstream. If it did then MACs would have just as many games as a PC.
Maybe they could legally emulate or simulate the functionality of DirectX and other notable windows libraries. Then most Windows games would work out of the box. A lot of the work has already been done in the form of Wine.
I remember it being said that they had to reprogram L4D2 to use OpenGL instead of Direct3D, since it's not available on Linux. I can see Valve and other indie developers converting their games in similar way, but not major publishers like EA, Ubisoft and Activision.

I don't see Linux becoming the leading OS for PC gamers any time soon, but it could still become a major one.
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
While I admire Stallman's resolve to stick to his principles, at the same time having more than one version of Linux isn't exactly...new?

The having your cake and eating it too philosophy of Linux has been liberating for all types of users, if not utterly annoying due to the lack of support caused by splintering your focus.

Anyway, while people may be skeptical about this, I think there's a reason why Valve's been trying to hide confirmation for so long, and both Gabe's willingness to publicly announce their intentions, in addition to their enabling huge piles of cash, lead me to believe that this might actually be possible.

After all, if they can replicate the performance they've had with the initial testing in other games, they could easily leap past other competitors just by the difference in efficiency alone. Forget next gen, they can just take current gen and blow the everloving shit out of everything else.
 

Laughing Man

New member
Oct 10, 2008
1,715
0
0
I can't wait to see where this goes next.
Big developers and publishers don't have to embrace Valve's system. Fuck them. Small independent studios will embrace it. They will profit from it and they will grow larger and more competitive. This is the way to innovate.
LOL right because their are massive queues of people waiting for the midnight launch of Super Meat Boy and World of Goo. If Steam want the Steam Box to stand a chance they need to make it so that the big developers want to use it, either that or they need a big name seller to get the stupid people and fan boys to buy in to the hardware early. Anyone else seeing HL3 as an exclusive for the Steam Box? If that's the case that's a whole new kettle of fail but that's for another post.
 

N3squ1ck

New member
Mar 7, 2012
243
0
0
FinalDream said:
snip, sorry
Lucky Godzilla said:
snip, sorry
I don't think that they would release a steamconsole (or "box") that doesn't support more than 90% of their library. So don't say no to it before you don't know whether or not they sat down and worked on that, just on the basis that it is running a linux-based system (GNU/Linux was pretty surprising to me that much stuff, while not officially supported, ran anyway with the help of wine. And this time a major corporation is working on it, so maybe, just maybe this might work out)
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
UNHchabo said:
albino boo said:
UNHchabo said:
Beryl77 said:
The only way I can see this to be successful is if many developers are willing to port their games to Linux, which is unlikely I'd say. My only worry about this is that it won't have many games, sure the Valve games will definitely work on this and maybe a few others but I doubt it will even come close to the next PS or Xbox.
When Steam first started supporting OSX, only a few games were supported. Since they provided the platform, many developers have taken advantage of that. I imagine the same will become increasingly true after Valve adds Linux support.

Even today, you can browse Steam and look at the games available for Mac [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/mac/] and Linux [http://store.steampowered.com/browse/linux/].
That is 342 games for Mac out of 1856 games on steam (all excluding dlc) so that is only 18%. For Linux its 38 out of 1856, which works out at 2%. Hardly a stampede.
Yeah, but both of those categories are getting larger each day, and every time new games come out, a larger proportion of them are supported on the other two platforms. Based on the New Releases and Top Sellers lists, the proportion of new titles supported on Mac looks to be more like 30%.





A crowd draws a crowd; if Valve supports Linux, more people will use Linux, which will draw more developers to support it.
When you take out the indie titles and just stick to AAA its isn't anywhere near 30%. This is something to do with the fact pcs outnumber macs 20-1 and linux as an os only has 1% of the desk top install base.
 

deathbydeath

New member
Jun 28, 2010
1,363
0
0
Hey Valve, here's some free advice: Hire/employ/do whatever it takes to get the guys who work on Wine [http://www.winehq.org/] to help you with porting games to Linux. Seriously, these guys are talented and dedicated, and they can get shit done.
 

songnar

Modulator
Oct 26, 2008
229
0
0
DirectX is nice and all, but not strictly necessary. I reckon we'll see an expansion of the OpenGL libraries very soon.
 

thesilentman

What this
Jun 14, 2012
4,513
0
0
Hoo boy, I am excited! I've waited for this for a long time...

Oh, and guys; Stallman is Stallman. He's known for saying things like that, but he usually has good rationale behind them. Well, in theory anyway.

albino boo said:
Bostur said:
albino boo said:
I think its going to be a mistake. Valves commercial rivals are not going to port their games to Linux to aid the profitability of Gabe. Its going to have valves games and a few indie titles but that's about it. Steam presence on a platform does not make it instantly the gaming mainstream. If it did then MACs would have just as many games as a PC.
Maybe they could legally emulate or simulate the functionality of DirectX and other notable windows libraries. Then most Windows games would work out of the box. A lot of the work has already been done in the form of Wine.
You can't legally copy DirectX. As to emulation, the only attempt to for directx has already had allegations of copying Microsoft binaries but for a full commercial release, Microsoft will going over the code base looking for reasons to sue. Microsoft are not going to licence the technology to a rival of the xbox. However you can use openGL on both OS's but that would require Valves rivals to port to opengl from directX. I also supsect that the Xbox 720 will use the latest DirectX version making it easier to port to the PC/xbox.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
flarty said:
If valve can nail porting engines to opengl, its open season.
If Valve can port the Source Engine to opengl, that's fine for them.

Other developers will still have to make the extra effort to port their own engines to opengl, and to support Linux. And there's no guarantee that they'll be willing to do so, seeing as to how they already spend millions porting between the 360, PS3 and PC.
Also, I'd like to mention that the PS3 runs OpenGL. All that the big guys need to do is leverage the PS3 code (or Mac, but Mac uses its own OpenGL, so that's not a good idea) for the Steam Box, and they're golden.

Laughing Man said:
I can't wait to see where this goes next.
Big developers and publishers don't have to embrace Valve's system. Fuck them. Small independent studios will embrace it. They will profit from it and they will grow larger and more competitive. This is the way to innovate.
LOL right because their are massive queues of people waiting for the midnight launch of Super Meat Boy and World of Goo. If Steam want the Steam Box to stand a chance they need to make it so that the big developers want to use it, either that or they need a big name seller to get the stupid people and fan boys to buy in to the hardware early. Anyone else seeing HL3 as an exclusive for the Steam Box? If that's the case that's a whole new kettle of fail but that's for another post.
Humble Bundles are a good source of knowing whether Linux users want games. They outpay the Windows and Mac users every year for the Humble Bundle. Also, marketing this as a cheap console that plays recent games is probably going to help the Steam Box get better.

Entitled said:
I'm pretty sure that if this is a PC, then you can just install Windows 7 on it along with the pre-installed Linux.
We're not even sure if it is. The article says pseudo-console, but for all we know, we might just get a PS3/X360 competitor with all the hatches sealed.

mrhateful said:
Is Richard Stallman misquoted or is he really that dumb?
I don't know what you mean by Stallman being that dumb. His idea of freedom is quite different than what we think of as freedom.

For all we know, Valve could potentially lock us in using the Steam box. Very implausible, as they've shown by being nice to us PC gamers, but not impossible.
 

Laughing Man

New member
Oct 10, 2008
1,715
0
0
Humble Bundles are a good source of knowing whether Linux users want games. They outpay the Windows and Mac users every year for the Humble Bundle. Also, marketing this as a cheap console that plays recent games is probably going to help the Steam Box get better.
They need to get their head out their arses and knock this atypical Valve bullshit tell you a bit of something that means nothing nonsense and just man up and say weather they are realising a gimped gaming PC that no one with a brain is going to want to buy or if they are entering the console market as a proper and direct competitor to MS, Sony and Nintendo cause right now the info they keep realising seems to be geared towards getting the idiot fanboys moist while leaving everyone else shrugging their shoulders and wondering what the hell is going on in Valve headquarters.