That maybe be so, but at least they have decent caps.BeerTent said:You think we got it bad? Look south of the border. Their networks are a sad, sad atrocity.Rainboq said:As a Canadian, the thought of 'cloud computing/gaming' terrifies me, and here's why. 97% of our country have ISPs that give us 60 Gigabytes per month of bandwidth for about 60 dollars per month. If there was no alternative to cloud computing, Canadians would be screwed when it comes to usage. Plus, I like being able to know where and what my hardware is and be able to tinker with it.
With that in mind, I think the benefits of having the files on disk outweigh the benefits of having a slave computer. Cloud gaming just isn't worth it anywhere else but it's niche.
Throttling isn't bandwidth, its not the traffic that worries me, its the volume.AzrealMaximillion said:As another Canadian I have to say that we may not be as screwed as you think. Last year Rogers and other ISPs were facing large fines for throttling World Of Warcraft. If cloud gaming caught on, its likely that similar rules would be enforced.robert01 said:^This. As a Canadian I had the option of no data cap, but shitty data rates, or vice versa. I get a 175GB a month and normally cut it close. Streaming games would not be an option for me. Also as a PC gamer I like diving into ini files, tweaking the game, and modding it. I didn't spend the money on high end hardware to have it reduced to a super console.Rainboq said:As a Canadian, the thought of 'cloud computing/gaming' terrifies me, and here's why. 97% of our country have ISPs that give us 60 Gigabytes per month of bandwidth for about 60 dollars per month. If there was no alternative to cloud computing, Canadians would be screwed when it comes to usage. Plus, I like being able to know where and what my hardware is and be able to tinker with it.