Mr.Tea said:
Oh great, another one of these...
Why is this so difficult, when it is so fundamental? The idea you dont own a video game is WRONG. The provision people pull up refers to taking a game, altering it, claiming the altered work based on the original work as your own. Sort of like lets say, using a dev tool kit from say bioware or bethesda, creating a full fledged content mod of that base game, say dragon age and repackaging that content mod as a full product of your own design.
That has absolutely nothing to do with the inherent ability to use the purchased product as one wishes. That is why this thinking is and has and will always be incorrect.
As for the base pricing. Look for yourself.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/218640/
http://www.gog.com/en/gamecard/lucius
This is far from the only example. Just an easy one to illustrate.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
CriticKitten said:
Expect many games in your PC-playing future to be filled with similar design choices built into the game purely to restrict or shut off your access at their whim. It *will* happen.
So....unless you intend to never buy a video game again, expect to see more and more of it as time goes on. It doesn't really make sense to ***** about one of the few decent DRM-filled services when there are certainly far worse hands you'll likely have to place your faith in for future AAA titles.
This is exactly why this is happening. Not because of it being the right thing.. because people for some insane reason are accepting it as a reason.
Psst, heres a little hint, If people stop buying games that have these problems, game publishers will have to relent under that pressure. Saying it WILL happen is wrong, because at this point we as consumers still hold the power to stop this customer abuse. It makes every reason to ***** about it, because the naive are what is allowing this to happen, and not saying anything is just as damaging. Thats why. When we see a diablo add always online required for single player be rewarded by massive sales instead of completely boycotted, you are allowing something blatantly wrong to occur because it tells all developers, despite it being a feature people have no reason to want, it will still sell.
_____________________________________________________________
Im sorry, but this type of thinking is not only incorrect, it is hurting all gamers, because it is ignoring fundamentals that were established long before video gaming came into the picture.
And it must be said again and again and again, until people stop hurting others with their neglectful approach that allows corporate interest to override individual freedom and protection. As long as it continues it cannot stop because they will not stop.