BSOD said:
nipsen said:
steel sphere that is Sony-land
Not sure why, but you got a real lol out of me on that one. Sony always reminded me of the innards of the Smithsonian. Polished, sophisticated, complex. But don't touch! Or you'll get your hand slapped by that cold-eyed exhibit curator.
*nods* right, the Smithsonian. Exactly. Thing is that a lot of the people who work there are really cool people. They love their jobs, and they love doing it well. But.. if something isn't on their job-description, they don't have any channels to raise issues. Curators can be critics in their spare time, but they don't deal with exhibitions. .. So if their product actually is awesome, then no worries. If it's not, then they just have to make the best of it as it is. Or just walk sternly around, etc. No dialogue or two-way process..
I mean.. I'm pretty sure Sony folks would put heaven and earth in motion to get some obscure release approved for distribution - if it's already considered. But there's no one there to look critically at the distribution and approval process. Or the criteria for selecting titles. Unless you have that project with indy devs that turned up flower, flow, Riff, etc. Then there's another process.. But there's that gap between HQ decrees and individual projects that can't be bridged, it seems.
And it's really negative for Sony.. it really is in their interest to sort it out, but.. there's no one in charge of a (non-existent) project like that..
edit: "unhackable", etc. Could very well have come from someone speaking to press off the cuff who don't really know any technical bits. (Regardless, it's internet myth, and therefore true.

)