I think it very much matters. If that sign has been up since before Fallout, before _Bethesda_, the infringement suit will get laughed out of court. Based on what I know of this area, and the overall style of the sign, both of those befores are highly likely.solidstatemind said:Doesn't matter: *snip*
I find it particularly funny that you kept the statement and discarded the support for the statement.Aristabulus said:I think it very much matters. If that sign has been up since before Fallout, before _Bethesda_, the infringement suit will get laughed out of court. Based on what I know of this area, and the overall style of the sign, both of those befores are highly likely.solidstatemind said:Doesn't matter: *snip*
Old sign, old graphic style. The wisp of a connection to vidja gaems. This is what happens when there's not enough real news to go around.
I'm sorry if that doesn't support your myopic point of view, but just because you don't want something to be a certain way doesn't mean jack shit.solidstatemind said:the specific image is a copyrighted design owned by Bethesda. Unless the pizza joint filed a copyright on that image that predates Bethesda's, any more than a passing resemblance means that Bethesda is within their rights to protect their intellectual property.
As I mentioned, this wasn't based off of my OPINION, this was based upon the legal opinion of a IP lawyer... although I suppose you could make the argument that Bethesda is based in Maryland, the truth is that most copyright claims in the USA are adjudicated on the Federal level... and while my sister's company is based in San Jose, CA, most of what she deals with is on the Federal or International level.solidstatemind said:-pre-existing use: If the pizza joint has been around longer than Fallout franchise has been, and can prove that they were using that image all that time, then they can reasonably argue that they should be exempt from Bethesda's legal protections. Sort of "it hasn't been a problem yet..." angle. This would probably work if they have the evidence to support it, but I bet that joint isn't that old, or wasn't using that logo before recently.
I do that because I personally find it annoying to scroll through several paragraphs of quotes to read a single sentence of reply. I am being the change I wish to see in the world.solidstatemind said:*snip*
Damn straight.TheRealCJ said:Yeah, that makes sense:setvak said:If the pizzeria owners are fans, I say let them keep it. If they're unaware of who Vault Boy is, then let Bethesda reign down their legal might with the wrath of an angry Jehovah.
"if they knowingly and willingly commited copyright infringement, they should be let off scot-free"
"if they made the simple mistake of getting the wrong image of of Google Images, let's burn them to the ground!"
You meant to have Bethesda there right?Khell_Sennet said:The unanswered question here is "how did they come to use that image"...
Could be they just searched for clipart on the web when making their own logo. Could be that they hired a marketing company to design their logo for them, and said marketing company is the one at fault. Or, it could be they intentionally used a known pop-culture icon hoping not to get busted. The greatest likelihood falls with them having hired someone to design their logo, and thus they are as much victims as Bethesda.
The fun of law is this could go any which way. Bethesda could sue, they could license the image to Expresso, or they could even partner up as some have mentioned. But nothing here says Bethesda will definitely come out ahead. Being of different markets, and depending on how long they've used the Vault Boy image in their logo, Valve could blow lots of money on a lawsuit and lose. It's not fair, but that's how law works (or fails to).
Yeah, but when did they start using that logo? Actually, what do you mean "risky"?jake09050 said:I was born in Billerica and lived there for 9 years and i can tell you Expresso's is a risky pizza place. There pizza is actually really good. Probably because they put a little Orange soda in the sauce.
A Langdell spaz at this point would be suing 2k Games for releasing Bioshock, and we'd still be waiting for Fallout 3 twenty years from now.RobCoxxy said:Bethesda seem fairly cool, so I don't see them pulling a Langdell spaz.
I see potential for a whole Fallout Theme'd restaurant here. Iguana Bits would be chicken, natch, since Iguana tastes like chicken.Captain Pancake said:I just hope the pizza doesn't taste like iguana bits...
Wow. Not going to bother to engage in a flame war with someone like you. If you're not smart enough to see that I addressed the exact situation you were describing-- and even explicitly focused on it in my response to you-- then I guess I just can't help you. Even if it's too difficult for you to skip over the nice box that sets quotes apart from responses, that laziness does not justify leaving out germane information if you're really looking to have a reasonable conversation and not just 'prove' that you're 'right'...Aristabulus said:I do that because I personally find it annoying to scroll through several paragraphs of quotes to read a single sentence of reply. I am being the change I wish to see in the world.solidstatemind said:*snip*
I read the whole thing, and I think your pro-litigious position is biased towards the vidja gaem angle. I also think you're ignoring _my_ point that the possibility that it's a genuine vintage sign using that art style. I do not possess a car, or the urge to go harass some pizza guys about their sign, so the Vintage Sign Question will remain in the box with the cat, at least for me. However, if it's correct, I believe no judge would let a software company grift a pizza joint over a sign because of an art style that was current when the sign went up. To make such a ruling would be tantamout to professional suicide.
For the record, I've been here since the beginning. Just haven't felt a need to register till now, when there was something regionally relevant for me to speak up about. I dearly miss the old front-cover-and-pages style Escapist originally used.
I've said all I have to say on the matter, so if you want to continue the "discussion", you should be able to locate a mirror in your nearest water closet. Good day.
I agree with you, I think it would look better with a guy in a chef hat and a handle bar moustache.Quick Ben said:You think it's cool? I just think it looks silly and out of place. But maybe that's because I'm so used to seeing it in a different setting...HardRockSamurai said:Even though it's a blatant case of copyright infringement, I do hope they let them keep the logo. It actually looks pretty cool...