Lightknight said:It would be interesting. The issue may not be booth babes, but may be the degree to which they're objectified. What about an attractive girl who is only slightly provacatively dressed (subtle and not too unrealistic) that is well trained on the product? Would that perform better or would that cease to be a booth babe?Paradoxrifts said:The real trick would be to hire booth babes that could do the same work as the professional saleswomen that he hired to 'compete' with them.
Well personally I'd like to think that it would be staffed entirely by overly-well-dressed men of between thirty and fifty years old, all trying to hide the mark on their finger where their wedding ring used to be...FPLOON said:As much as I am one of those people that are saying "of course Booth Babes don't work", I wonder if a "Booth Babe Convention" would be more effective with or without actual Booth Babes at the actual booths of said convention?
It might be that the stands with the booth babes were popular because the companies running them had popular products, and could afford to hire booth babes more easily because they had more money. It's not necessarily the case that the booth babes were generating the interest.hermes200 said:As someone that had to work on a trade show because of my knowledge and was close enough of other stands with booth babes, I have to doubt the results of this experiment. If your intention is drawing attention and traffic on your booth, babes work a lot better.
I also think it may have been the novelty of it at the time. Having an attractive woman dressed up in an alluring manner would generate more attention.Bad Jim said:It might be that the stands with the booth babes were popular because the companies running them had popular products, and could afford to hire booth babes more easily because they had more money. It's not necessarily the case that the booth babes were generating the interest.hermes200 said:As someone that had to work on a trade show because of my knowledge and was close enough of other stands with booth babes, I have to doubt the results of this experiment. If your intention is drawing attention and traffic on your booth, babes work a lot better.
I think they get hired because the managers that run the stands want hot babes on their stalls to chat up when it's quiet. "Sex sells" is just an excuse.
I also think it may have been the novelty of it at the time. Having an attractive woman dressed up in an alluring manner would generate more attention.Bad Jim said:It might be that the stands with the booth babes were popular because the companies running them had popular products, and could afford to hire booth babes more easily because they had more money. It's not necessarily the case that the booth babes were generating the interest.hermes200 said:As someone that had to work on a trade show because of my knowledge and was close enough of other stands with booth babes, I have to doubt the results of this experiment. If your intention is drawing attention and traffic on your booth, babes work a lot better.
I think they get hired because the managers that run the stands want hot babes on their stalls to chat up when it's quiet. "Sex sells" is just an excuse.
Except those woman are being paid to do a job. They are being paid to stand around, look pretty and attract attention. They don't get to pick and choose what the people they attract look like. Nobody is forcing these women to be there, they chose to be there. You can't get a job at a strip club and then demean the very people who came to the club out of some sense of bitter vindictiveness. It seems like you are personally offended by the mere existence of booth babes and the people that like them.MatsVS said:I think, seeing as "booth babes" are there solely to be sexual objects for men, they should be allowed to judge the men approaching them by exactly the same metric. As in, if a creepy dude who looks pretty much like a bag of testie-sacks someone kicked over, like the dude depicted in the story, they girls should be allowed to make that observation and deride him for not being up to their standards. It'd only be fair, really.
I've only been to Sci-fi conventions, but even though they sell a whole lot of stuff (books, movies, toys, weapons, whatever) I haven't seen a single boothbabe. I count myself very lucky, because I would most likely lose my shit if they started cropping up.secretkeeper12 said:What was the name of that convention? You've made me very curious!DANGER- MUST SILENCE said:I don't have a broad experience with trade shows, but the one big one that I was at (for a boring, technical industry) I don't recall even a single booth babe. To be sure, if any company had any employee under 40 who worked in the office and was vaguely attractive then she was assigned to staff the booth (my company included), but I don't think there was a single woman there in non-professional attire or who didn't act as a representative of the company with information on hand.
In fact, when I Google image search that trade show's name together with "booth babe" all I get are pictures of fat beardy men in sweater vests and pictures of product. The trade show was pretty boring for me, but then again I was only there for tech support- I'm not actually interested in the product. I imagine for people who wanted to be there, there was enough to occupy their attention without needing boobs in a sling. I prefer my professional environments be professional, radical feminist that I am.