unabomberman said:
Who said it was okay?
I think inherent in your point tho' is people might expect companies to data mine for sales information ( marketable demographics, etc )- but yes, it is scarier when a gov't does it.
As to the multinationals, if you think the idea of them being stronger than some nations is unique to our time period, I would remind you of the end of medieval era history - the guilds and citizens were able to field better armies than their feudal "lords", and anyone who doesn't think that impacted history probably hasn't thought it through.
That's hardly a fair comparson. For starters, guilds and citizens had no lobbyists; and second, they had nowher enear the same amount of resources at their disposal.
As I said, I submit you have not thought it through... and if you aren't studying medieval history, I may get condescending - it was going to be my major.
I will try to disagree respectfully, esp since I was agreeing with your tone in substance, i think.
Anyway, relatively, the Guilds and banks had GREATER resources ( relative to the nations of the time ), and in fact, some of today's multinationals ARE the old multinationals ( you can get into arguments over who and when and etc that get a little ... controversial, i'd rather stick to the "easy" stuff ).
the com-panis of Italian trade, and the old banks ( after the templars and, yes, Jews ) -
were the first multinationals.
Let's not discuss Switzerland, but understand, those multinationals had resources you simply aren't taking into consideration, and Lobbyists?
How about Popes? ( look up the Medici )
Alderman and all Guilds DID have representatives in levels of government - and if you happen to be english, i ask you to consider the house of commons.
ALL the european powers I am aware of ended up selling lordships to businessmen who had more money than them -
and last but not least, i wasn't joking - not just in Italian, but as commerce became important in Europe, burghers began to be able to field armies that could stand up to and handily defeat the feudal lords.
People talk about guns, but there's more to it than that. ( actually, guns SUCKED for quite a while - the key to defeating heavy cavalry was well-disciplined footmen, which require consider professionalism that implies $ )
* edit * and later, when guns sucked less, people started realizing they could stand up to national armies with conscripts and 1/2 the world revolted *
In fact, historically speaking, the nation-states of today are BETTER OFF economically than the medieval era states were relative to commercial interests - partially BECAUSE the fall of medieval powers created stronger nation-states by negating the distribution of power through feudalism ( magna charta ; for example, recognizes this ).
It wouldn't be much longer' til the actual kings became as disempowered as their lords had.
Anyway, forgive my pedantics;
the point is, and was, multinationals having considerable influence is no new thing.
* edit: India Trading Company vs. Emperor of China *
Where there's money, there tends to be evil...
I think you asked if it's any less evil if a gov't spies on us than a company; and that was the real point...
and my response was/is, here in the west, we
expect our government to be protecting us from such dastardliness...
and i said it in italics, b/c I agree with your example sof how frightening our Gov't acts towards it's own citizens.
Are you by chance familiar with John Locke, not to mention Machiavelli?