J03bot said:
Oh, and Cats and Dogs 2. It's not a game, but why the hell is there a sequel coming out?
That one completely baffles me. Why make a sequel to a fairly forgettable kids movie that came out ten years ago? I highly doubt kids today have even heard of the first movie, let alone actually seen it. Though I think MovieBob put it best:
"This would be like if ten years from now, someone made a sequel to Hotel For Dogs. Ha, see? You already forgot Hotel For Dogs existed."
And while I'm talking about movies, I have to mention Home Alone 4. A straight-to-DVD movie that's supposed to have the same characters from the first two movies, only the entire cast
seriously doesn't look a thing like the old one. Why does Kevin now have brown hair and coddle a teddy bear? Why is Buzz suddenly five years younger, at least? Why have Marv's and Harry's names switched? I seriously don't think the writers had even seen the other movie's, they just looked up the synopsis on Wikipedia.
Anyways, gaming. Kane and Lynch is certainly questionable, as well as DJ Hero 2. I thought both of these games predecessors sold poorly? Oh wait, I guess DJ Hero was bound to get a sequel just because it's Activision.
Also, Bugs Bunny's Crazy Castle. Those of you who watch the AVGN know what I'm talking about. For those who don't know, this is a complete mystery. A really crappy NES game gets a sequel on the Gameboy. Then, almost ten years later it gets TWO MORE sequels on the Game Boy Color. But it doesn't stop there, they make a fifth game on the GBA only they replace Bugs Bunny with Woody Woodpecker. So basically it's a bad and forgettable game series that lasted somewhere around fifteen years because someone out there thought this series was worth reviving. Just think about that for a while.