You do realize that the system is pretty much rigged against making such changes, right?StarCecil said:We can still use political means to achieve change - if that is truly what's necessary - and use some actual effort to sort the situation out.
You do realize that the system is pretty much rigged against making such changes, right?StarCecil said:We can still use political means to achieve change - if that is truly what's necessary - and use some actual effort to sort the situation out.
This is probably the most sensible reply in this entire thread.thepyrethatburns said:You do realize that the system is pretty much rigged against making such changes, right?StarCecil said:We can still use political means to achieve change - if that is truly what's necessary - and use some actual effort to sort the situation out.
So the group has a name at least, and I assume the male speaking is their leader?books of war 13 said:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15140671
this link shows some more insights probably from the British perspective of the riots along with some quotes. From this it looked like this people were protesting about a capitalist country which cares more about corporations than people.
In Britain we don't fear our government, we just tut and sigh whenever they fuck more stuff up. And then steal a few more televisions.Lethos said:Also, I'm just going to point this out. I know in the US there is a political culture to hate and fear your government, but don't be so brash as to believe that this culture is shared all around the world.
I'd have thought that Police Brutality would considered supremely unprofessional and subject to investigation. The thought of PB being 'irrelevant' makes me a bit uneasy, though, I lack perspective given the context of the matter.thaluikhain said:Police brutality is almost irrelevant. Sure, it can make people angry, which is what is needed to escalate a situation like this, but only if it is viewed as a big deal.
Last I checked, unemployment in America hit just above 8%. That's a lot of people losing jobs and out of work, yet you don't see the corporate top-dogs who have played the market losing out. Don't get me wrong, I don't think the situation is simple and that there are a number of perspectives which should be taken into account. Yet, given the perception it is hardly surprising that there is considerable anger. I think it's justified to a degree, but 'revolution' seems like a farce of an idea.StarCecil said:I have to agree with this. I think a good chunk of these protesters are doing so irrationally because they're angry. They don't understand the real politics and don't know what they are really talking about, but lashing out against the wealthy for being "corrupt" is a handy recourse, used every time the economy gets shaky.
I'm sure there are people with real issues and who understand the situation, but most of these people are just left-wing nuts.
This made my day!Kysafen said:I think people should shut up and let the rich get richer for doing nothing but investing and selling minute parts of businesses. After all, playing the stock market is one of the most back-breaking, beneficial things one can do for humanity.
Protesting the circumstances that perpetuate the stratification of wealth? Responsible police? Free speech? Fuck those far-left liberal wackos, I play the stock market and I say let the poor be poor! Isn't that right, $300/minute prostitute giving me a blow job as I type this message?
Prostitute: MMMFFKKKK HMMMMMM
The prostitute says yes.
I live with a few people from the UK. When I asked them about the riots they identified that there were legitimate grievances relating to government and corporate corruption. However, they felt (rather strongly) that those legitimate grievances were hijacked by a number of undesirable social elements, including legitimate criminals. The overall response from the House of Lords seemed quite divided.ultimateownage said:Only a few months ago we were stealing from shops for literally no reason.
There was unrest in London, and then someone got shot (Which wasn't as horrific as everyone made it sound, a guy provoked an armed officer and he was consequently shot) so people decided to have a protest. Then a lot of chavs and other idiots decided it was the perfect time to get some new stuff. Most of the videos of the 'rioting' has the rioters trying and failing to explain why they were doing it. So I consider the original protest a little pointless, and the looting disgustingly pointless and shameful.Still Life said:I live with a few people from the UK. When I asked them about the riots they identified that there were a legitimate grievances relating to government and corporate corruption. However, they felt (rather strongly) that those legitimate grievances were hijacked by a number of undesirable social elements, including legitimate criminals. The overall response from the House of Lords seemed quite divided.ultimateownage said:Only a few months ago we were stealing from shops for literally no reason.
What's your take?
Well yes I fear the US government. Anyone who doesn't is naive, simple-minded or a total lick-spittle... and I'm Canadian... I'm going ot assume you're American, so it's probably not as bad for people in the US as those outside looking in. From the outsiders viewpoint, the US government is flippin scary... Department of Homeland Security? No-fly lists? Crazy bailouts that seem to do little? Yeah cant blame us Canucks for being a bit nervous.Crono1973 said:Sounds like you fear the government.Ashannon Blackthorn said:It's a weird situation. two things are pretty clear. 1) Things are bad and somehow need ot change for the better. 2) Most of the protestors out there now don't have a sweet clue about how things are working or how it effects them.
If we can change number 2 to influence number 1, well now things might start getting interesting. Right now it comes across as more "random protests against the man cause the man is bad" than anything. Annoying cause it plays right into governments interests to have such stuff happen. They can justify the force used to stop the protests, enact laws they want to counter future protests (and help their positions) and it kinda cycles.
Trust me, the whole protest is so asinine that it doesn't deserve mention. If you lived in NYC you'd know what I mean.Raddra said:Honestly the main thing that worries me about this is the lack of media coverage. Since it kind of displays who is controlling our access to information.