Watch Dogs on PS4 to Be at 1080p and 60fps According to Sony - Update

Novander

New member
Oct 30, 2009
43
0
0
I don't want a PC in my living room. I work 50 hours a week between uni and my minimum wage, dull as hell job. When I get home I just want a box I can put a disk in and video games will happen, with minimum effort on my part. I've pre-ordered the Watch Dogs/PS4 bundle, so to me this (if true) is awesome news. I didn't know Driver: SF ran at 60fps, but that's a good sign since it was also a Ubisoft game
 

Rozalia1

New member
Mar 1, 2014
1,095
0
0
Revolutionary said:
I Love all these Sony thralls saying "yes, thank you glorious Sony our master race ascends!", When this has been the minimum standard for a good port on PC for years. In addition to that, this game isn't even that visually impressive by PC standards. It was......[a href=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.844254-Watch-Dogs-suffers-bullshots-scandal-Ubi-damage-control-censorship-update]but then[/a].
... ... ...

Really, really? After all the above posts you surmise them as being Sony Thralls? Sad that your type of response is so common in threads like these.
 

votemarvel

Elite Member
Legacy
Nov 29, 2009
1,353
3
43
Country
England
Novander said:
I don't want a PC in my living room.
But you have one.

Today I burnt a CD on my PC and it made me realise that it is the first time in months that I've done something on my PC that I'm not also capable of doing on my 360 or PS3.

I can listen to my music from Amazon on a console browser. Do office work on the online version of Microsoft Office at Skydrive (now OneDrive). Download movies and TV etc.

If you have a console from the current generation (PS4/One) or the previous (PS3/360), then you have a PC in your living room.

The only genuine difference these days is from who you get your games.
 

Creator002

New member
Aug 30, 2010
1,590
0
0
I own an Xbox One and I don't really care, to be honest. As long as the game is fun and runs smoothly enough to my eyes, I'm happy.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
well thety better do that. after all when we saw how horrible the game looked on the PS4 version that evne started a scandal about them lieing till we found out that the demo was PC graphics and the later video was PS4 graphics they better do 1080p/60fps with that. because if they cant do that with such low graphics all i got say is million facepalms are incoming. and yeah, it would also explain the bloated PC requirements - they are shit at programming.
votemarvel said:
Today I burnt a CD on my PC and it made me realise that it is the first time in months that I've done something on my PC that I'm not also capable of doing on my 360 or PS3.
as i type this post i currently have browser, skype, video and another program all visible on my monitor, while i got an online map and Oblivion wikipedia visible on another monitor. consoles cant do that. consoles are very limited when you get down to it. But you are right, they are just PCs with very limited OS (btw, welcome to 1995 capabilities! i see your catching up fast) and locked down hardware.

oh and i also got 4 programs running in the background (something new consoles still cant do properly), one of them actually counting every keystroke and click i put here turning it into keyboard and monitor heatmaps, just because i can.
 

james.sponge

New member
Mar 4, 2013
409
0
0
"experience Watch_Dogs in a way that only PS4 can provide, at 60 Frames Per Second in 1080p"

yep we will still get shitty textures and clunky particle effects but at least it's 1080p O.O
 

votemarvel

Elite Member
Legacy
Nov 29, 2009
1,353
3
43
Country
England
Strazdas said:
as i type this post i currently have browser, skype, video and another program all visible on my monitor, while i got an online map and Oblivion wikipedia visible on another monitor. consoles cant do that. consoles are very limited when you get down to it. But you are right, they are just PCs with very limited OS (btw, welcome to 1995 capabilities! i see your catching up fast) and locked down hardware.

oh and i also got 4 programs running in the background (something new consoles still cant do properly), one of them actually counting every keystroke and click i put here turning it into keyboard and monitor heatmaps, just because i can.
I confess I'm not one for having too many programs open. I'll have it open if I am using it, otherwise I just don't see the point. Even Steam gets shut down when I finish playing a game.

With the 360 though I can be gaming, listening to music, and be in Party Chat at the same time. So while the console can't multi-task to the same extent as the PC, it can do it to a limited degree
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
Congratulations, Sony! You won the "victory by default because xbox one shot themselves in the foot and ubisoft treats wii u with as much respect as they would to a carnival worker, and the pc is technically not a console" award.
 

DarkhoIlow

New member
Dec 31, 2009
2,531
0
0
Update: The 1080p and 60FPS text on Sony's website has been removed.

Well now..the mails from Ubisoft to Sony PR finally went through eh? Sure seems like it.
 

SKBPinkie

New member
Oct 6, 2013
552
0
0
I have a gaming PC and a PS4. But based on some of the posts here, I'd much rather be considered a console gamer.
 

josemlopes

New member
Jun 9, 2008
3,950
0
0
JimmyPage666 said:
Very doubtful. In fact I doubt the 60 fps thing is fully legit either. After seeing benchmarking for Tomb Raider - another so-called 1080p 60fps experience. In that case it was more of a case of 60fps max, 45fps average. High frame rates are great but consistent frame rates are equally important.
Not just that, then they release a patch that allows you to lock at 30fps (Killzone and Infamous are the ones I know), so much shit flinging but in the end they cant mantain 60fps either. They really shouldnt use this as the biggest selling point for their version.
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
Fuck, I have a PS4 and if it's 720p 40 FPS or more, I would be over the moon. I don't really care about all this resolution or frames per second.

If I did, I would game on a PC but I want this on my console ... though, I doubt my PC could run it at all.

I think this whole resolution/FPS talk is PC douches (I am not calling all PC gamers douches, just anybody who has ever said "pc master race") trying to attack consoles for inferior hardware.

Yes, consoles have inferior hardware but constantly stating the obvious is annoying.
 

nevarran

New member
Apr 6, 2010
347
0
0
Ups, the bandwagon got a little bit ahead of itself, huh?

They were just preparing the tweets, when an email from Ubi came saying: "60 what?"

omega 616 said:
I think this whole resolution/FPS talk is PC douches (I am not calling all PC gamers douches, just anybody who has ever said "pc master race") trying to attack consoles for inferior hardware.
You mean douches from Sony, right? Because they're the ones boosting about it.
 

Shadow-Phoenix

New member
Mar 22, 2010
2,289
0
0
nevarran said:
Ups, the bandwagon got a little bit ahead of itself, huh?

They were just preparing the tweets, when an email from Ubi came saying: "60 what?"

omega 616 said:
I think this whole resolution/FPS talk is PC douches (I am not calling all PC gamers douches, just anybody who has ever said "pc master race") trying to attack consoles for inferior hardware.
You mean douches from Sony, right? Because they're the ones boosting about it.
You mean the users on here constantly telling us that they've build a PC rig of their own that can do above and have done so for years etc?, that kind of boasting that never seems to stop either?, is one to be accepted while the other not?.

I understand what he's saying but I think it's good for Sony to say that they can get up to that, to assure those who bought into the console that they are getting what they are getting, having some PC only douche saying "toplel I can get that and more on my 8k monitor" does nothing for anyone else other than the circle jerk crowd, which is what I can see happening on here per Omega pointing that out.
 

J Tyran

New member
Dec 15, 2011
2,407
0
0
Novander said:
I don't want a PC in my living room. I work 50 hours a week between uni and my minimum wage, dull as hell job. When I get home I just want a box I can put a disk in and video games will happen, with minimum effort on my part. I've pre-ordered the Watch Dogs/PS4 bundle, so to me this (if true) is awesome news. I didn't know Driver: SF ran at 60fps, but that's a good sign since it was also a Ubisoft game
Without making this all about "PC is better" you can do all that with a PC, its fairly cheap and easy to build an almost silent PC thats a touch bigger than the Xbone and play with a controller on your TV. You can also get compact "lounge" keyboards with a built in touchpad for browsing and social media etc, a PC isn't something thats restricted to just a desk anymore (Laptops aside for the moment, just making a point about the more static "desktops" but you can even plug a laptop into a TV and use a wireless controller as well).

There is no need to fiddle with drivers any more either, Nvidias GeForce experience will take care of the drivers for you and even optimise the settings of your game based on the hardware and its great for PC gamers that don't want the hassle but want their games running and playing as well as they can be. AMD have something similar but I have never used it so I cannot personally vouch for how well it works. There is no real increase in effort most of the time, you acquire the PC game and play it. The last console game I played was GTA V, in the time it took to actually install the damn game I could have downloaded a digital game of the same size and been playing it for 5-10 mins with my PC. With all of the installation and updates and firmware patches the consoles have now they have no real advantage in convenience, probably less with the long loading times for store and menu pages you have with a console.

The games on the PC are cheaper to buy as well which for people with a limited income can get to play far more games than they would on consoles, even with the loss of trading games in because you can often buy games in sales for less than you lose on the cost of trading a game in.

PCs are no longer honking big towers chained to a desk that need a lot of fettling, unless you want that of course. They can be compact, user friendly and as powerful as you want. Even things that where the province of the hardcore PC builder like liquid cooling and overclocking are things that can be learned about and done in a a couple of hours, or even without learning about it at all with all in one liquid coolers and automatic overclocking software.
 

nevarran

New member
Apr 6, 2010
347
0
0
Shadow-Phoenix said:
You mean the users on here constantly telling us that they've build a PC rig of their own that can do above and have done so for years etc?, that kind of boasting that never seems to stop either?, is one to be accepted while the other not?.

I understand what he's saying but I think it's good for Sony to say that they can get up to that, to assure those who bought into the console that they are getting what they are getting, having some PC only douche saying "toplel I can get that and more on my 8k monitor" does nothing for anyone else other than the circle jerk crowd, which is what I can see happening on here per Omega pointing that out.
Are you comparing Sony's PR to random teens posting crap on the web?

Actually, I stand corrected, they do seem on the same level...
 

Shadow-Phoenix

New member
Mar 22, 2010
2,289
0
0
nevarran said:
Are you comparing Sony's PR to random teens posting crap on the web?

Actually, I stand corrected, they do seem on the same level...
Compared to the same amount of times on here, I;d say just a bit differently in number, the teens still outweigh the PR speak many more times on here from what I've seen, I lurked in 2008-9 and joined in 2010, still seen more user speak than PR though.
 

Mothhive

New member
Apr 2, 2010
79
0
0
Well, looks like the reason for the change in wording is revealed!

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-05-13-confirmed-watch-dogs-ps4-900p-xbox-one-792p-both-30fps

On new-gen systems the game will run at 900p on PS4 and 792p on Xbox One, at 30 frames-per-second on both consoles."
 

NuclearKangaroo

New member
Feb 7, 2014
1,919
0
0
Mothhive said:
Well, looks like the reason for the change in wording is revealed!

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-05-13-confirmed-watch-dogs-ps4-900p-xbox-one-792p-both-30fps

On new-gen systems the game will run at 900p on PS4 and 792p on Xbox One, at 30 frames-per-second on both consoles."
oh boy, there be a shitstorm a brewin'

i cant wait to see Sony and Microsoft fanboys fight over a couple of pixels, again
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Mothhive said:
Well, looks like the reason for the change in wording is revealed!

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-05-13-confirmed-watch-dogs-ps4-900p-xbox-one-792p-both-30fps

On new-gen systems the game will run at 900p on PS4 and 792p on Xbox One, at 30 frames-per-second on both consoles."
Sonys lying gets swept under the rug. Thing is if MS did this this thread would be exploding with anti MS comments. lol. Oh well, im sure it will play well on both consoles.