It's not a "gamer" thing, it's a pc enthusiasts thing. People like to have control over their systems, especially people spent a lot of money on their rigs, and don't like having content providers give them arbitrary limits to when they can play their games. It's more crap running on your computer. Do you have a car? Imagine if every time you got gas, they only give it to you unless you had big sticker with the company's logo plastered on it and you had to do this for for every franchise. I don't care if it's harmless, I don't want junk on my system. And then there's the inherent security risk that comes with giving your info to a bunch of companies. I had to sign up for Uplay to use a game I legally purchased and how was I replayed? With an email a few months later saying their servers were hacked which means people could have gotten into my email account. It's this "I don't care" attitude that got pc gaming all other forms of digital media into this bullshit situation in the first placekortin said:Wow, I'm astonished by how many massive babies there are here. It's not like they're making horrible cut content dlc, they're not engaging disgusting business practices, they're not buying up your favorite devhouses and then firing the employees. They're just making it use uplay.
I'm not trying to defend their decision here, I'm not trying to say that they should, I'm saying all of you guys have the most absurd priority list. It's essentially why most people don't take gamers seriously.
because the PC crowd is the most profitable, as evident by financial reports.Weaver said:Still really not sure why Ubi even bothers publishing on the PC if they hate it so much.
Uplay is a bad service. Origin isnt a bad service. in some regards its even better than steam. Uplay on the other hand is just unstable DRM while not as catastrophic, still closer to GFWL than Steam.Elberik said:Because the PC portion of the gaming industry is growing. Uplay isn't a bad service, it's just vogue to hate on Not-Steam clients.
the fact of online DRM in form of UPlay begs to differkortin said:they're not engaging disgusting business practices,
wow i was about to make a rebuttal till i realized this was sarcasm. well played sir.Kameburger said:I think what everyone is forgetting about DRM is that if they focus on making a good experience for you to play the gaming rather then focusing on prevention you from stealing it, you'll definitely steal it.
One thing that has been proven through out history is that if you give people the freedom to be criminals they will be criminals 100% of the time. If Ubisoft doesn't use UPlay to assert their dominance over yo... I mean protect their property, then you would definitely 100% illegally download this content because you are a criminal. Also its proven science that rules never ever in human history have ever lead to an increase in crime or even slightly encouraged in any way ever. These are facts people.
Complete and utter bullshit.Kameburger said:I think what everyone is forgetting about DRM is that if they focus on making a good experience for you to play the gaming rather then focusing on prevention you from stealing it, you'll definitely steal it.
One thing that has been proven through out history is that if you give people the freedom to be criminals they will be criminals 100% of the time. If Ubisoft doesn't use UPlay to assert their dominance over yo... I mean protect their IP, then you would definitely 100% illegally download this content because you are a criminal. Also its proven science that rules never ever in human history have ever lead to an increase in crime or even slightly encouraged in any way ever. These are facts people.
Lol partly my fault, but yeah it happens to the best of us.Cerebrawl said:EDIT: Looks like I fell prey to Poe's Law.
Ubisoft has used and abused DRM far more than EA has even thought of. When it comes to DRM all publishers are trying to catch up to Ubisoft. Part of ubisofts titles being pirated is because of the invasive heavy handed DRM like FC2's limited number of installs unless you revoke an install which is impossible to do if the HDD failed once, You upgraded your motherboard before revoking(yes major hardware upgrade counted as an install even if the OS or anything else was not changed), and you did the 1 revoke you had left but Ubisoft never registered it because Ubisoft servers are shit. It is bad when legit customers have to resort to piracy just to play the game they legally purchased but that is quite a few Ubisoft customers.themutantlizard said:snips
true all DRM should be banned and publishers should stop trying to disguse DRM as a feature. Ubisoft is as bad as EA.
Yeah God forbid something other than Steam exists in the PC market. Actively supporting a digital service monopoly, PC gamers these days...thewatergamer said:*sigh* While I know i'm not supposed to be surprised I'm still disappointed,
At least Origin has some features that actually make it somewhat useful, even though the only game I bought on it is titanfall and I probably won't buy any other games for it...
But I'm sorry I hate Uplay, it seems absolutely pointless to me, I already have to run through steam why is it necessary to go through Uplay as well?
*sigh* Well this just killed alot of my interest in watchdogs
I thought after south park the stick of truth they were doing away with it
Oh well dark souls II is coming out on PC soon so maybe ill just get that instead
They're not inherently bad. Most online services are marketing data gatherers anyways. The big problem I have with Uplay is how it went down for a whole month in December 2012. I couldn't play Driver: San Francisco then. Steam has never gone down for so long and doesn't block games off with that DRM hurdle.Cartographer said:Doesn't matter how "not that bad" it might be; like Origin, Uplay is simply not going to get installed on my PC. I won't support companies like Ubisoft (or EA) while they try and force feed us excrement in the name of "convenience" when it's painfully obvious to all it's simply DRM and a marketing data gatherer (and a bloody obtrusive one at that). At this point, they can't even price themselves into my good books (not that they've really tried), it'll take multiple, public apologies and several years of them demonstrably having changed tack before I'll ever think about trusting them again.