They really should have just had 30 seconds of close-up floppy demon wang with 'floooo-peeee de-mon waaaang, floooo-peeee de-mon waaaang' being chanted throughout.
You do realize that this is the same ad committee that rejected a GoDaddy.com commercial because it made an abortion reference?John Funk said:EA had a chance here to make the furor over Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" look like a polite Sunday School discussion, and they dropped the ball. Though, knowing some audiences, directly telling everybody watching to "Go to Hell" might be enough on its own.
wow that old ad was much, much better. the new one is blah in every form of the word. they should have just kept the ad and changed the tag line.Virgil said:Except they're not allowed to show it. CBS rejected the ad [http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/02/ea-dantes-inferno-super-bowl-ad-.html] with that tagline, so it's being changed for the actual commercial to "Hell Awaits".John Funk said:Though, knowing some audiences, directly telling everybody watching to "Go to Hell" might be enough on its own.
Heh, it might certainly raise questions XDEl Poncho said:The big demon schlong and vagina monsters put me off. I don't want my family walking in while I am being beat to death with a deadly penis.
Damn, beaten to it. I was going to post that.Virgil said:Except they're not allowed to show it. CBS rejected the ad [http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/02/ea-dantes-inferno-super-bowl-ad-.html] with that tagline, so it's being changed for the actual commercial to "Hell Awaits".John Funk said:Though, knowing some audiences, directly telling everybody watching to "Go to Hell" might be enough on its own.
That wasn't the real ad, it was a trailer... (It wasn't 30 seconds and would've been like $10 million)...josh797 said:wow that old ad was much, much better. the new one is blah in every form of the word. they should have just kept the ad and changed the tag line.Virgil said:Except they're not allowed to show it. CBS rejected the ad [http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/02/ea-dantes-inferno-super-bowl-ad-.html] with that tagline, so it's being changed for the actual commercial to "Hell Awaits".John Funk said:Though, knowing some audiences, directly telling everybody watching to "Go to Hell" might be enough on its own.
Oh no, you're thinking linearly. 100+ seconds of Super Bowl airtime would probably be closer to $50 million at least. They'd charge extra for the privilege of blocking other advertisers who otherwise would have access to those 30 second blocks.Poopie McGhee said:That wasn't the real ad, it was a trailer... (It wasn't 30 seconds and would've been like $10 million)...josh797 said:wow that old ad was much, much better. the new one is blah in every form of the word. they should have just kept the ad and changed the tag line.