Wearing kids clothes as an adult

Jamieson 90

New member
Mar 29, 2010
1,052
0
0
You might be wondering where this thread is going, but bear with me, it's not as weird as it originally sounds. So anyway this evening when I had returned from one of my regular swimming sessions (I'm an avid swimmer and swim quite often), I turned my black pair of Speedo Jammers inside out only for the label to catch my eye, with said label reading "boys size 32," and just to clarify I hadn't bought these as they were recently given to me as a gift, so I had no reason to suspect they were actually a boy's item of clothing.

Noticing this I spoke to my mother who had bought them for me, only for her to be surprised since she'd only been searching for my size when buying them online, hence she too hadn't noticed and who would blame her?

Here is a comparison of the two.





They're actually pretty much the same, same colours, practically the same shape, same make up of materials, the only difference is that the leg on the Jammer meant for men is 44cm, while the one on the boy's is 39cm, which for someone like me who isn't exceptionally tall, isn't that much of a difference. In fact the boy's size 32 fits me pretty well and isn't at all uncomfortable nor that different from a men's size 32, and while I'm not exceptionally tall I'm not small either, nor am I skinny as I'm quite well built.

So here's the really interesting part, having thought on this for a while I loaded up the Speedo website and found both products, only to find that the men's Jammer is currently priced at £20 while the boy's is currently priced at £11, making it £9 or 45% cheaper with hardly any difference between them RE the product itself. That's because kids clothes don't have VAT and are generally cheaper anyway.

Understanding this I asked myself do people know about this? Are there guys (Or even women doing the same with girls clothing) out there who are perhaps between sizes 30-32 who purchase say plain non infantile like clothing from the boy's section to save money? I mean how could anyone tell unless you bought something that was particularly cartooney or child like? No one's noticed my boy's Jammers which are identical in looks to the men's version, hell it took me a week or two to notice and I was wearing them! And I only did because I looked at the label which no one else would be able to observe.

So members of the Escapist, have you thought about this? Perhaps even done it yourself or known someone who has? Or would you consider doing it to save money? As for my self I personally wouldn't feel comfortable going into the children's section of a store, but with online shopping it wouldn't that hard to do.
 

piinyouri

New member
Mar 18, 2012
2,708
0
0
Huh, that is interesting.
If it were me, I'd get the kid version. Less money, and I have no shame.

Somewhat related, I still have clothes from middle school that fit me fine. I've weighed 160 since I was 14. : D
 

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,248
0
0
I have a few friends that are girls who do that with shoes to save a lot of money.
 

soren7550

Overly Proud New Yorker
Dec 18, 2008
5,477
0
0
Best I can think of is that I still got a shirt or two that I've had since early elementary school, but then again, those were hand me downs that were most likely for adults.
 

Bertylicious

New member
Apr 10, 2012
1,400
0
0
I dunno. I went shopping about 12 years ago and thought; "this is alright, I'll just wear this for the rest of my life."

The thought of having to go shopping for clothes brings me out in hives. You know my work shoes wore out last winter? I had to go shoe shopping but everywhere I went wanted to charge me £120 for a pair!

Holy fuckballs! I've bought cars for less money!

In the end I found a pair of shoes in the back corner of some establishment for £20. They're perfectly presentable and constructed, just not the latest releases from whatever mad fasion firm releases new versions of a form of shoe that has remained unchanged for over 150 years.

My theory is that all clothes are massively overpriced normally so that they can "slash" the prices for the sales. Under such ludicrous market conditions I think you're right to leverage whatever means to pay a reasonable price.
 

Raikas

New member
Sep 4, 2012
640
0
0
Jamieson 90 said:
So members of the Escapist, have you thought about this? Perhaps even done it yourself or known someone who has? Or would you consider doing it to save money? As for my self I personally wouldn't feel comfortable going into the children's section of a store, but with online shopping it wouldn't that hard to do.
If you're short enough (or skinny enough) it's not about saving money - it's that those are the only clothes that fit. Most of my paternal-side relatives are short and skinny, so we all do it.

My father had small enough feet that he only rarely found men's shoes that he could wear, so he always had to buy from the youth section. I've been the same height (and nearly the same weight) since I was 13, so I find that a lot of kid clothes fit better than supposed same-sized adult clothes just because of the proportions. My sister is so tiny that even the smallest women's sizes are baggy on her, so she really has no choice in the matter.

The savings are brilliant though.
 

Shinkicker444

New member
Dec 6, 2011
349
0
0
I'm tiny myself, cause of health issues and stuff, but yeah I'm 30 but still fit into the clothing I wore when I was a teenage. So yeah, shopping for me is pretty damn cheap. I just get the mostly plain stuff with maybe some super basic patterns that are no different to the adult version (not that I have much of a choice in the matter, buying jeans for example is a real pain in the ass, hell I had a pair of womens jeans at one point for a little while and no one was the wiser - did eventually find a pair of mens that fit me properly though).

Best pair of shoes I ever had I got when I was like, 15. Lasted me 13 years before they fell apart from old age.
 

WickedFire

New member
Apr 25, 2011
126
0
0
My mum is pretty much forced into this sometimes. She was looking in the shoe shop, and all of the women's shoes were too big. She has very small feet, which is somewhat funny considering my dad has huge feet and can only rarely find shoes big enough. Basically, don't go shoe shopping with my parents, it always ends up a wasted journey.
 

Harlemura

Ace Defective
May 1, 2009
3,327
0
0
Being pretty lanky myself, I don't think I'd fit into any children clothes. But if I could save money by doing so I totally would. Most of my shirts have some gaming or pop culture reference anyway, so it's not like I worry about dressing smart.
I don't know anyone that buys children clothes for themselves, and since most people I know are either tall or on the larger side, there's not really anyone I can share this new found knowledge with. I'll be sure to pass on the advice to any titchy friends I make down the line, anyway.
 

Caiphus

Social Office Corridor
Mar 31, 2010
1,181
0
0
Eh. I'm reasonably tall, so I don't think kids sizes would fit me any longer.

But hey, if they were big enough, and looked the same, why not?
Especially if ordering over the internet, because then there's no shame of waltzing up to the dressing room/checkout with kids' clothes and a sly grin on your face.

Edit: Shame/creepiness, frankly.
 

Ragsnstitches

New member
Dec 2, 2009
1,871
0
0
Bertylicious said:
I dunno. I went shopping about 12 years ago and thought; "this is alright, I'll just wear this for the rest of my life."

The thought of having to go shopping for clothes brings me out in hives. You know my work shoes wore out last winter? I had to go shoe shopping but everywhere I went wanted to charge me £120 for a pair!

Holy fuckballs! I've bought cars for less money!

In the end I found a pair of shoes in the back corner of some establishment for £20. They're perfectly presentable and constructed, just not the latest releases from whatever mad fasion firm releases new versions of a form of shoe that has remained unchanged for over 150 years.

My theory is that all clothes are massively overpriced normally so that they can "slash" the prices for the sales. Under such ludicrous market conditions I think you're right to leverage whatever means to pay a reasonable price.
I read this as "clothes shopping sucks" and I totally agree.

I'm a hefty guy. I know the size of clothes I'm most comfortable in and feel no shame in getting it (I don't try to squeeze into a size down just to appeal to vanity). However, clothes shops ALWAYS make me feel fat. I seem to jump between 15 and 16 stone throughout the seasons (what is that in Kg?) but I'm naturally heavy set... I Just have little extra cushioning.

This isn't a problem in those large stores like Pennys or TK Maxx. But I go into any fancy pants clothes store and pick out the size I know I fit into, and it is ALWAYS 2 sizes smaller then it reads on the label. I know clothes sizes vary somewhat from store to store, brand to brand etc. but exclusively those stores that project very vain images (you know, ones were scarves and trilbies are considered all purpose casual accessories). I'm literally at the farthest tier of sizes that those stores accommodate, but only because the labelled sizes are consistently 2 sizes smaller then the standard that I buy my clothes with. What's more, they are always in alarmingly short supply of the last 2 sizes that can fit me.

I am at that border point where I am almost too fat to shop there.

I personally think this is a deliberate effort by these stores to make customers feel self-concious, so they'll buy all sorts of accessories to detract from their perceived fat ugly asses.

OT: I have a friend who buys all his shirts at boy sizes. He just has such a small frame that it's all he can wear. There are certain shops that accomadate his size (which come out as extra small or extra extra small) with more mature aesthetics, but considering he wears mostly shirts with bands, superheroes or various depictions of skulls he doesn't really need to upgrade to adult sizes. It's only an issue when he is trying to dress for formal occasions like job interviews.
 

EstrogenicMuscle

New member
Sep 7, 2012
545
0
0
Wearing children's clothes is awesome.

I don't understand what it has to do with feminism though. Just thought I'd go on a tangent for it, and sadly I can't find the picture. Edit: Hah! Found it!


The "who needs feminism" thing had a woman who liked dressing in lolita fashion. AKA wearing clothes typically deemed for little girls. I mean, it's great, that but that was one of my "what does that have to do with x" thing. Seems more controversial or neutral than anything. On the other hand I bet the SRS fempire would totally think "pedophile enabler, infantilizing women, benned." Which is why, despite being a feminist, I don't think I want to be a part of that. Seeing the witch hunts for SRSAnime and the like has made me want to stay far, far away from them.

I'd like to say to this person "Hey, I'm a feminist and I totally respect your desire to dress like that. But I'm pretty sure that's not exactly feminism. And that many feminists would be offended by your self infantalization as "pedo enabling".

Sorry for the tangent. I just wanted to get it off my lolita loving chest of how seemingly unrelated subjects people have made a big, complicated moral deal out of. This section is spoilered for being a tangent.

Anyway, I have no problem with wearing children's clothing. Or even extremes of self-infantilization. Those two pairs of bike shorts look practically identical, anyway. There's a lot of kid's clothing that I think looks terrible. But there's also a lot of children's clothing that I think looks great. I personally think that having clothing for groups is silly. "This clothing is for women", or "this clothing is for children". It's all silly to me.

Like, why does clothing need to have an age or a gender? Someone could make an argument for groin guards since male genitals are very delicate. Or sports bras since running without one hurts for many women due to breasts. But not all women have breasts, and many men do. Heck, not all women have vaginas and not all men have penises. But in any case, people should wear clothes for personal reasons. Either because they make them feel comfortable or because they personally like them. Again, clothing doesn't need to be attached to groups. And especially not genders. I don't think it needs to be attached to ages, either.

Again, if adults want to wear clothing apparently 'intended for children.' Why not? I'm sick of this whole "manchild" or "manbaby" or whatever thing. Or that that's for children and that's for adults when clearly many of these things have nothing to do with adulthood or maturity. Watching cartoons and playing video games is not for kids, and neither is clothing. For goodness sakes pastel colors are great and I think more people should wear them.

I made that spoilered tangent earlier, because while I don't think it's feminism to dress up like a little girl(nor is it anti-feminist). I totally agree with what she says on the matters.
http://princess-peachie.tumblr.com/post/22269969777/i-am-a-feminist-because-i-believe-women-should-be
I am a feminist because I believe women should be allowed to choose to wear whatever they like.
(at least when no uniforms for work/school apply)

I see/hear so many messages in the media telling us to wear clothes that look slimming, or look modest, or show off our womanly form, or don?t look trashy, or don?t look too ageing, or don?t look too childish. You will feel fabulous if you dress this way, or you will be a real woman if you dress that other way. So many conflicting messages. It is exhausting!

Did you ever notice how in the kids/teens aisle of clothing stores everything is so much more colourful and varied, whereas the adult section tends to be more emphasized with black, dark or earthy colours? What is this message saying to us? That when we grow up, we have to become ninjas or camouflage ourselves, to blend into the background and not stand out? Bah I say- bah!

My message also aims to reach out towards guys who like to wear feminine clothing, but get bullied or laughed at for doing so; because looking feminine is still something that can?t be taken seriously today.

Can we all not just wear what we like, and carry on with life?
It?s my body. It doesn?t belong to anyone else. I should be able to adorn it however I wish- at least in my free time.
Like, why do vibrant colors or other things associated with children's clothing have to be for kids. Again, people should totally wear what they want to wear. Clothing is just clothing. It should be used for utility or self expression. It isn't something that should usually be appropriate or inappropriate(unless you have a shirt saying problematic things or something). People are way too judgemental on the subject of clothing.
 

bigwon

New member
Jan 29, 2011
256
0
0
I just go to thrift shops.

I was actually surprised as to how durable some of those seemingly overpriced shoes are. I ended up with these skating shoes from a sister's Ex from many moons ago (high school years) and I decided to adopt them. Little smelly buggers survived a good amount of job sites and just general walking/hiking (probably not ideal for my feet)

Gave me some more perspective when comparing 200$ shoes to 45$ shoes that I usually end up having to replace by winter's end.
 

Raikas

New member
Sep 4, 2012
640
0
0
EstrogenicMuscle said:
Like, why does clothing need to have an age or a gender? Someone could make an argument for groin guards since male genitals are very delicate. Or sports bras since running without one hurts for many women due to breasts. But not all women have breasts, and many men do. Heck, not all women have vaginas and not all men have penises. But in any case, people should wear clothes for personal reasons. Either because they make them feel comfortable or because they personally like them. Again, clothing doesn't need to be attached to groups. And especially not genders. I don't think it needs to be attached to ages, either.
Eh, to be fair (and I say this as a short person who often wears kids clothes), it's about averages. Sure, there are very few people who are average in every way and if all your clothes are maide by a tailor then it's irrelevant, but for ready-to-wear stuff it makes sense.

Baby (and young child) clothes have ages on them not because every single baby is the same size but because it at least gives you an approximation - most people aren't going to walk around with their nephew's size measurements, but knowing that he's 18-months old (or whatever) is solid stuff.

Same thing with the gendered clothing - if you're mass-producing clothes, it makes sense to differentiate between women's (clothes for people with hips and breasts) and men's (clothes with space in the crotch) - because again: averages. Sure, a guy who's had an unfortunate accident (or who is trans or just small or whatever) might not need that crotch space, but there's nothing stopping him from buying from the women's or children's sections.

I mean, I agree that the whole "pink clothes are for girls/dark clothes are for boys" is totally a social thing, but average body sizes are actually grounded in physical reality.
 

TehCookie

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2008
3,923
0
41
I still wear lots of kids cloths, but only as PJs since most aren't decent enough to wear in public. At least with girls, kids cloths are a lot shorter than juniors, the t-shirts turn into belly shirts and pants flood. Sometimes you can find some that fit well since girl sizes aren't based on measurements, but it's easier to look in the section that fits your body type.

However I still like to buy my sleep shorts from the girls section because elastic fits all, they're cheaper and I find them more comfy.
 

Jamieson 90

New member
Mar 29, 2010
1,052
0
0
aba1 said:
I have a few friends that are girls who do that with shoes to save a lot of money.
I know women's shoes can be quite expensive, so what sort of savings are they making (roughly)? I ask out of curiosity and interest.

piinyouri said:
Huh, that is interesting.
If it were me, I'd get the kid version. Less money, and I have no shame.

Somewhat related, I still have clothes from middle school that fit me fine. I've weighed 160 since I was 14. : D
I know I've been 164/168 since I was about 15/16? So I can still fit into a size 32 waist quite easily, hell I reckon I could get into a size 30 although it'd be a stretch (Pun unintended).

Raikas said:
Jamieson 90 said:
So members of the Escapist, have you thought about this? Perhaps even done it yourself or known someone who has? Or would you consider doing it to save money? As for my self I personally wouldn't feel comfortable going into the children's section of a store, but with online shopping it wouldn't that hard to do.
If you're short enough (or skinny enough) it's not about saving money - it's that those are the only clothes that fit. Most of my paternal-side relatives are short and skinny, so we all do it.

My father had small enough feet that he only rarely found men's shoes that he could wear, so he always had to buy from the youth section. I've been the same height (and nearly the same weight) since I was 13, so I find that a lot of kid clothes fit better than supposed same-sized adult clothes just because of the proportions. My sister is so tiny that even the smallest women's sizes are baggy on her, so she really has no choice in the matter.

The savings are brilliant though.
For me it was more about the potential savings, but I had considered there might be people out there who are forced into doing this through no fault of there own, I wouldn't get down over it though because like you said, I bet you save a tonne of money by doing it.
Johnny Novgorod said:
Maiev Shadowsong said:
Crotch space.

Worth considering.
This person has a point and I endorse it, as far as pants go.
I'm not sure how much a difference there is or whether manufacturers knowingly add more space or whether it's just based on the waist size, for example I've worn both men's size 32 Jammers and boy's size 32 Jammers and I didn't find any differences in regards to space, although by nature swimwear is quite tight anyway.
 

EeveeElectro

Cats.
Aug 3, 2008
7,055
0
0
I wear Hello Kitty clothes with 0 fucks given.

If it looks good, you like it and feel good in it I see don't why anything else matters. You shouldn't dress for the approval of others and if you save money, then bonus.
Of course all my clothes are adult ones, I can't fit into kiddies clothes. I've seen some lovely pre-teen clothes which I usually buy for my nieces but if I could wear them, I would!
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,900
0
0
Never been that serious about what I wear. Most of my clothing is labeled either "medium" or "large". My usual pants are "medium regular" (military sizing works well for me), my swim trunks are "large" (more drag equals better exercise, I'm not racing), and my shirts are generally "large".

That said, I'm the same size I was at age 15 (I was pretty big, as high schoolers go)... so some of my clothing is ~17 years old. I guess that makes those kids' clothes.
 

Spider RedNight

There are holes in my brain
Oct 8, 2011
821
0
0
Though I'm tall so pants/jeans/skirts aren't really an option, to upper apparel, I say screw it; if I can wear it appropriately and I like it, I will regardless of it's a kid's shirt, a male's shirt or otherwise. LUCKILY, these past five years I haven't had to go shopping much; I stopped growing when I was, like, 14 so I've been the same height and weight for EVER

(If there's ANYTHING good about today's youth being obese, it's the increased likelihood that there's a shirt I want that's technically not made for adults - NO TMNT IS SAFE FROM ME NOW)