Good choice sir! I checked that out on a whim because it was on BBC iPlayer, and I was pleasantly surprised. Further proof that Liam Neeson can do no wrong.Sexual Harassment Panda said:I really enjoyed Seraphim Falls.
It chucks you in the deep end, and refuses to give you context for what's happening or who you should be sympathising with for the majority of the film.
I would rather be confused than bored.
Funny, that's exactly the reason I fell for it. The build up kept me guessing for a fair while (maybe I'm just stupid though) and kept me interested in the film. Add to that the great acting, cinematography and music, and you have one of my all time favourite films. But to each his own as they saySomeBritishDude said:Honestly "Once Upon a Time in the West" was a movie I really didn't enjoy all that much. It had it's moments but honestly for me it was way too slow. It takes 40 or 50 minutes before you really have a good idea what the motivation is or what the movie is really about, and once I worked it out I didn't really care all that much anymore. It's shame seeing as there were some great performances.
Woah, there's a wealth of films there that I've never even heard of, thanks for that they should keep me going for a whileBobDobolina said:Love me some westerns. The Magnificent Seven is a classic. The Sergio Leone westerns are still great, for sure; some of the other Spaghetti westerns, mostly forgotten now, were great too, like A Pistol for Ringo and Django. Many of the older westerns haven't aged as well for the most part, but there are some that are still amazing, like Warlock with Anthony Quinn and Henry Fonda.
Far as modern Westerns go, The Assassination of Jesse James By the Coward Robert Ford is amazing. Also Silverado, Unforgiven, Open Range, Appaloosa, The Missing, Wyatt Earp, Ned Kelly... all entertaining. Even the cheese: Young Guns 1 & 2, The Quick and the Dead (ludicrous, but fun), Maverick... Tombstone (sort of a terrible movie, actually, except it has Val Kilmer as the best Doc Holliday ever put on film). But I have a special place in my heart for Dead Man with Johnny Depp, The Proposition with Guy Pearce, and Ang Lee's Ride With the Devil.
Sexual Harassment Panda said:Good choice sir! I checked that out on a whim because it was on BBC iPlayer, and I was pleasantly surprised. Further proof that Liam Neeson can do no wrong.Wadders said:I really enjoyed Seraphim Falls.
It chucks you in the deep end, and refuses to give you context for what's happening or who you should be sympathising with for the majority of the film.
I would rather be confused than bored.
I especially liked the hallucination type sequence with the lady on the caraven in the desert. It's a shame it's not more well known.
I do really like Liam Neeson. The logical part of me knows that Taken wasn't a great film, but I enjoyed the heck out of it...entirely based on his performance.
The last scene of Seraphim Falls was interesting.
I don't think the film did well, which is a damn shame, I would like more films that buck Hollywood convention whilst not sacrificing watchability, like this did.The proprietor that they dealt with, was called Louise C. Fair(probably meant to sound like "Lucifer"), the scene has a cool deal with the devil vibe. I'm pretty sure that they have both taken a bullet at this point, so maybe they are already dead...who knows?
edit - Screwed up the quoting...
I will definitely give the movie that.Wadders said:I gotta say one thing about that movie though. Claudia Cardinale. Just wow!![]()
I disagree with you, sir. We talk about Westerns all the time here. I'm fairly sure there's a good amount of Western fans here. That said, it's hard to go wrong with those Sergio Leone spaghetti westerns.Wadders said:Westerns are not a genre of film I hear much about on this forum, so I was wondering if any of you wonderful people are fans of the genre.
I've only got into them relatively recently, but I love most of the ones I've seen so far. Most of Sergio Leone's so-called spaghetti westerns, a lot of the later Clint Eastwood ones and a few modern ones. I've not yet seen any John Wayne westerns though!
So far I'd say my two favourites are Once Upon a Time in the West and 3:10 to Yuma (the new one) They both utterly absorbed me with their gripping stories, fantastic scenery and quality acting and brilliant soundtracks. Also, thanks to Sergio Leone, I am now obsessed with the music of Ennio Morricone, who did most of the stuff for the Dollars Trilogy, Once Upon a Time (and Inglorious Bastards) as well as many others I'm sure.
So yeah, what western films do you love, what ones dont you love and why? Also, any reccomendations would be good
EDIT:
DAMN! I knew I had forgotten something. Namely; The Wild Bunch.
And why has no one mentioned this cornerstone of the Western Genre thus far?!
Escapist, I am dissapoint.
I'm not too sure really, they just didn't particularly appeal to me. I prefer the over the top stylization of Spaghetti westerns. John Wayne's (at least the ones i've seen) are a bit more straight forward action flicks. That and the blatant racism in some of them makes me a little uncomfortable.Wadders said:Why is this, may I ask?Treefingers said:However i really don't like any of the John Wayne westerns that i've watched, of which i've seen about 4.
I've never seen any of his Westerns and am curious to see what others think of them![]()
Interesting, but i definitely wouldn't class Gran Torino as a western. I'd sooner call the original Star Wars trilogy a western.ilovemyLunchbox said:If you'd like a western that doesn't actually take place in the west, Gran Torino is fantastic.
There are loads of subcategories of westerns, and a couple of them account for what is basically a western story set in modern or even futuristic sci-fi settings.Wadders said:Well shit, I'm sold.ilovemyLunchbox said:I can understand that, but I'd argue that Eastwood played an older character who was stuck in the ways of the past, reluctant to adapt as the world changed around him. The central conflict of the movie revolved around a community full of people being harassed by a gang who considered itself the real authority in the area. He swooped in to protect and save them.Wadders said:I cannot wait to see what happens in RDR but at the same time, I never want the game to end haha!ilovemyLunchbox said:I'd like to second Red Dead Redemption. One of the best westerns I've ever seen, and the fact that it is a video game just makes it more immersive as a story. Seriously, OP, just wait until that climax. Holy shit.
Film-wise, "Fist Full of Dollars" trilogy is an essential. If you'd like a western that doesn't actually take place in the west, Gran Torino is fantastic.
And yes Gran Torino is amazing, but is it really a western? Sure it's got Clint Eastwood, but that don't make it a western. It's a moral story as many westerns are, but I'd hesitate to classify it as one
Though it may not be considered a traditional western, I'd definitely group it in with the classics.Then, by ultimately sacrificing himself for the sake of the neighborhood, he completed the perfect hero role.
I guess you're right. Now you put it like that, the similarities between it and traditional Westerns are too hard to ignore. I just didnt want to call it a western because there were no cowboy hats, horses and super-accurate revolvers![]()
Now THAT'S an interesting opinion. I'd like to hear your reasoning, if you don't mind.Treefingers said:Interesting, but i definitely wouldn't class Gran Torino as a western. I'd sooner call the original Star Wars trilogy a western.ilovemyLunchbox said:If you'd like a western that doesn't actually take place in the west, Gran Torino is fantastic.
Sure.ilovemyLunchbox said:Now THAT'S an interesting opinion. I'd like to hear your reasoning, if you don't mind.Treefingers said:Interesting, but i definitely wouldn't class Gran Torino as a western. I'd sooner call the original Star Wars trilogy a western.ilovemyLunchbox said:If you'd like a western that doesn't actually take place in the west, Gran Torino is fantastic.