Except everyone who votes on the award is a videogame writer, so no, not a valid criticism.Zombie_Moogle said:No disrespect to the Writers Guild, but the mechanical aspect of how videogames tell their story might make the WGA a bit unqualified to judge them
Thanks for the clarification - I've updated the post accordingly.Leperous said:Just to clarify, the nominees do NOT need to be members of the Writers Guild of America... they only need be members of our affiliated Videogame Writers Caucus, membership to which is open to any writer who has ever shipped a single game. If a writer is not a member when their game comes out, they can join simply by submitting their game for our award. In other words, EVERYONE is eligible for our award.
Isn't the issue that it's the Writers Guild, which contains very few game writers?Leperous said:Except everyone who votes on the award is a videogame writer, so no, not a valid criticism.Zombie_Moogle said:No disrespect to the Writers Guild, but the mechanical aspect of how videogames tell their story might make the WGA a bit unqualified to judge them
Uh... lessee, two handheld spinoffs,josemlopes said:I think its best if we just ignore the existence of these awards
So, like, are these the ONLY six games whose developers are members of the Writers Guild of America Videogame Writers Caucus?Andy Chalk said:nominees must be members of the Writers Guild of America Videogame Writers Caucus