Since when is marriage a right?queenorivers said:No see here you're wrong about your definition of the term misconception. Yes someone pointed this out before but I'll reiterate. A misconception is a common misunderstanding of something which is a fact. Your statement is debatable and the use of the words "i think" mean opinion, therefore what I said isn't a misconception at all but an opinion.Kyoufuu said:Ladies and gentlemen, proof that it is a -very- common misconception.queenorivers said:I think it is!Silver_Hammer said:Its not?- That not believing in gay marriage or being opposed to gay marriage and being against gays are the same thing.
Being against gays would be something like the Westboro Baptist Church, the 'God hates gays' lot, those people. The misconception that this is the same as simply not believing in gay marriage is equivalent to believing that Muslims who believe in the Koran kill non-Muslims ("If they attack you, you may kill them. This is the just retribution for those disbelievers." K 2:191). Aka, a big one.
Also denying someone's rights is a clear sign of opposition.
You misunderstand, I put it pretty badly so I don't blame you. Denying to be given the right to marry, not talking basic human rights here.feather240 said:Since when is marriage a right?queenorivers said:No see here you're wrong about your definition of the term misconception. Yes someone pointed this out before but I'll reiterate. A misconception is a common misunderstanding of something which is a fact. Your statement is debatable and the use of the words "i think" mean opinion, therefore what I said isn't a misconception at all but an opinion.Kyoufuu said:Ladies and gentlemen, proof that it is a -very- common misconception.queenorivers said:I think it is!Silver_Hammer said:Its not?- That not believing in gay marriage or being opposed to gay marriage and being against gays are the same thing.
Being against gays would be something like the Westboro Baptist Church, the 'God hates gays' lot, those people. The misconception that this is the same as simply not believing in gay marriage is equivalent to believing that Muslims who believe in the Koran kill non-Muslims ("If they attack you, you may kill them. This is the just retribution for those disbelievers." K 2:191). Aka, a big one.
Also denying someone's rights is a clear sign of opposition.
I was answering to this: "Only an atheistic-normative perception results in the default position of 'no god',", which is wrong. Since there is no difference between "There is not one bit of evidence for x." and "X doesn't exist." Another way to show why the default position is "X doesn't exist."letterbomber223 said:There was no concept of America, hence the automatic assumption. Objectivity has no -unproven- default assumptions.Kashrlyyk said:No, the default position is always "x doesn't exist" if there is no evidence for the existence of x.letterbomber223 said:....
Only an atheistic-normative perception results in the default position of 'no god', an objective view has no default position for complete uncertainty to return to.
2000 years ago in Europe the default position was: "There is no America." And at that time that was the correct default position, because there was no evidence for America's existence. Therefore right now the rational default position is "There is no god.".
If the universe created itself and time and the laws of physics and everything, and if this could be proven (obv red-shift; so sensible folk believe in the big bang & expansion, but not necessarily the rest of it) then a shift from monotheistic father-gods to a more hindu-like consideration of 'god as the universe' still makes sense.
Even with proof of expansion, there is no application of occham's razor in a field where there is no certain knowledge and no measurement possible.
Unless I've missed the point?
Wait, so now there are only 6 continents? I was under the impression that North America and South America were seperate continents. I don't know, maybe we're just taught differently in the UK.imagremlin said:Yep, that's exactly it. I was born is South America, which, together with North (and, for some, central America) make up America, the continent. Therefore, technically speaking I'm an American.Dark Knifer said:Ah, that makes more sense... Sorry for the misunderstanding.Baradiel said:I think that was his point. Not sure, but thats how I read it:Dark Knifer said:Uhh, what about Canada and Mexico? Are they not part of the North America continent?imagremlin said:That America is a country when its actually a continent.
ie, When people say 'America' they usually mean the United States of America, as opposed to either of the 'Americas'. I think that was what he was getting at.
Ahhh, he beat me to it.Zeeky_Santos said:I lead you to the Wikipedia List of Common Misconceptions. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_misconceptions]Dark Knifer said:Simple question, what misconceptions do you know of that are just blatantly wrong?
Mine would be that all Muslims are terrorists. If that was the case then there would be, literally, a billion terrorists in the world. I seriously doubt that.
Your turn.
![]()
Snapping fingers, it happening.Spot1990 said:Actually it does happen very rarely. And it's totally awesome... Wait, define "command"...angelbe2232 said:I lead you to the Wikipedia List of Common Misconceptions.Zeeky_Santos said:Simple question, what misconceptions do you know of that are just blatantly wrong?
Mine would be that all Muslims are terrorists. If that was the case then there would be, literally, a billion terrorists in the world. I seriously doubt that.
Your turn.
Ahhh, he beat me to it.
Also, all bisexual/lesbians girls will make out with their girlfriend in front of you on command. This does not happen. EVER.
All dictatorships are bad. This really depends on the dictator.
I'd like some uhh, clarification on these two 'misconceptions' if you could.Arsen said:- That evolution and the whole "we evolved from apes" segment of it aren't two seperate philosophies.
- That evolution itself has no scientific inconsistencies that are beyond explainable.