That's my childhood.Dirty Hipsters said:What do I think about archeology?
Does anyone think about anything else when archeology is mentioned?
The Temple of Doom scared me more than Alien ever did. I saw them both when I was 9 or younger.
That's my childhood.Dirty Hipsters said:What do I think about archeology?
Does anyone think about anything else when archeology is mentioned?
YeaH, sure:skywolfblue said:There are a number of things that were done in the past that we still have no clue how exactly they accomplished them (Stonehenge or the Easter Island Stones for example), so learning how those were done could possibly improve our understanding of engineering even today, so I can see that kind of stuff as useful.
Those movies almost made me go into archeology. I still understood that isn't what real archeology is about, but I figured having the same profession as Indiana Jones would be cool enough.Dirty Hipsters said:What do I think about archeology?
Does anyone think about anything else when archeology is mentioned?
Hooray! I'm not the only one with a degree in it anymore! Happy Dance Time!PainInTheAssInternet said:I'm studying the field so I'm obviously biased towards a positive perspective
The Elder Scrolls 5: SkyrimSimpleThunda said:Lets not forget that archaeology covers more than just 2000 year old pots and bowls. If you dig up a medieval sword somewhere, that is also archaeology. Basically all visual representations we have of history are a product of archaeology or some form thereof. The way people lived, how they fought, what they ate, etc. All things archaeology helps to solve.
Da fuck?Brutal Peanut said:Just keep digging, just keep digging! Digging, digging, digging!
Because Buster Bluth is an idiot, but you know,..there will always be money in the banana stand.blackrave said:Da fuck?Brutal Peanut said:Just keep digging, just keep digging! Digging, digging, digging!
Why would anyone crack a skull?
No really, WHY?
Actually, yes.Dirty Hipsters said:Does anyone think about anything else when archeology is mentioned?
But nowhere near as fun.Jasper van Heycop said:I view it in a positive light, due to being a history buff. I think there is more chance we'll discover answers when we look at our ancestors then out in space. Brushes and pickaxes are also a lot cheaper than satellites and drones
Old Mesopotamia, by any chance? That must be rather irritating, I can imagine. I've always found it oddly petty when nations and factions won't leave the people armed only with brushes and suncream in peace.Alorxico said:Hooray! I'm not the only one with a degree in it anymore! Happy Dance Time!PainInTheAssInternet said:I'm studying the field so I'm obviously biased towards a positive perspective
I have only been on one dig, though. Being female really limits your prospects, especially when your field of expertise is currently the hotbed for civil war, political strife and military coupes.
The biggest job that museums do is to stop things being stolen. There is a massive black market in antiquities and leaving mummies in their tombs just means they would stolen and never seen again. In the recent turmoil in Egypt, the main museums were plundered and thousands of items were stolen. They was also mass illegal diggings on known sites in search of items for sale.Xan Krieger said:Part of it is good, I love learning about history but I think when it comes to the dead they should be left in peace. Take for example mummies who were taken from their resting places and put in museums, seems highly disrespectful especially given all the people they worked to death to make the pyramids. I would say all of them should be returned to where they were found, we learned what we needed now put them back.
Not sure where a moral issue would be regarding archaeology in general - maybe digging up actual graves, which can be part of archaeology, but that's only a part of the field not the entire field. As for how useful it is... I think it's worthwhile, but in the grand scheme of things it's not that useful. I wouldn't discourage anyone from entering the field, nor diminish their accomplishments within the field, I just don't see it as being a useful field of study.PainInTheAssInternet said:I'm studying the field so I'm obviously biased towards a positive perspective, so I'd like to get an outside perspective. As the title says what do you think of the field? How have movies, games, documentaries and novels influenced your view of it? Do you think that there is a moral issue regarding the field?
Do you think that it is useful?
Actually one of the most recent developments in the field of archaeology is the use of satellites. Basically they are using technology that was developed for looking for soviet bunkers in the 70s to look for buried structures and thus finding new dig sites.Jasper van Heycop said:I view it in a positive light, due to being a history buff. I think there is more chance we'll discover answers when we look at our ancestors then out in space. Brushes and pickaxes are also a lot cheaper than satellites and drones