yes women SHOULD have the right to choose.SeeIn2D said:Question: Do you agree that women should be able to choose or do you think that abortion should be illegal?
Question 2: Do you think that men have a right to help pass or stop a law which prevents abortion?
But to what extent? Just because it's a majority opinion, doesn't mean it's the morally right one. Think of votes that excluded woman from voting, Segregation laws etc. At some point it was a minority who believed those were the moral perogative.Fluoxetine said:Both male and female politicians, as well as all civil servants, need to pass laws according to the majority wills of their district. Women have the right to vote, and their votes should be counted accordingly in all issues. No more, no less.
The gay marriage issue really got me thinking about this. We had politicians demanding voter recounts for gay marriage after a clear majority vote decided against it, and then after it was brought into legislature we had civil servants refusing to sign the certificates. It doesn't matter where you stand on the issue: ACCEPT AND OBEY WHAT THE VOTERS TELL YOU THEY WANT.
That's not what a Republic is, and yes. the US is a Republic. It is sometimes clled a "Democratic Republic," but it is a republic.DJjaffacake said:Zachary Amaranth said:ShnipThe USA is a democracy, a representative democracy. A republic is just a country without a monarch, China and North Korea are republics.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Shnip
Eh, scrap that post, wasn't paying attention to what you were replying to. Jumped the gun with that one.Zachary Amaranth said:That's not what a Republic is, and yes. the US is a Republic. It is sometimes clled a "Democratic Republic," but it is a republic.DJjaffacake said:Zachary Amaranth said:ShnipThe USA is a democracy, a representative democracy. A republic is just a country without a monarch, China and North Korea are republics.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Shnip
Yeah, and the supreme power in China and North Korea most certainly does not lie with the people.Wolverine18 said:snip
What you described is a direct democracy, the US is a representative democracy, they're two sides of the same coin.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:a democracy is defined as a nation in which citizens vote to determine public action & policy. We don't do that in the USA, we have the citizens elect officials to do that for us.DJjaffacake said:Zachary Amaranth said:ShnipThe USA is a democracy, a representative democracy. A republic is just a country without a monarch, China and North Korea are republics.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Shnip
I'm not saying the US isn't a republic, I'm saying a republic and a democracy are different things.Zachary Amaranth said:That's not what a Republic is, and yes. the US is a Republic. It is sometimes clled a "Democratic Republic," but it is a republic.DJjaffacake said:Zachary Amaranth said:ShnipThe USA is a democracy, a representative democracy. A republic is just a country without a monarch, China and North Korea are republics.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Shnip
Why should a man not have any say? (I take it you meant "No, men should have no say" instead of the double negative you wrote.) The child is as much the man's as it is the woman's. Yes, she carries the child, but it could still be in the man's heart. And what if a man isn't ready to be a father? He shirks the responsibilities thrust upon him by society and is instantly the devil incarnate.Beautiful Tragedy said:yes women SHOULD have the right to choose.
No men should have no say.
to add- I understand if a woman gets pregnant and the man wants it, and she doesn't that can be hard, but if you're gonna have sex with someone shouldn't it be with someone you love, and you've discussed having children... dream i live is pretty by the way.
My government and politics class uses direct [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy] and representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy] democracy, and wikipedia agrees with me.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:My social studies classes always called it representative republic or constitutional republic.DJjaffacake said:What you described is a direct democracy, the US is a representative democracy, they're two sides of the same coin.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:a democracy is defined as a nation in which citizens vote to determine public action & policy. We don't do that in the USA, we have the citizens elect officials to do that for us.DJjaffacake said:Zachary Amaranth said:ShnipThe USA is a democracy, a representative democracy. A republic is just a country without a monarch, China and North Korea are republics.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Shnip
Doubt that actually. The only difference between you and the majority on this forum is that you first note you wouldn't want one when personally concerned.The Artificially Prolonged said:Oh boy I think I'm going to regret posting *prepares flame shield*
Just sayin', but a republic is a democracy. The only reason it has a specific name is to mark the difference with a constitutional monarchy - which also is a democracy.DJjaffacake said:My government and politics class uses direct [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy] and representative [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy] democracy, and wikipedia agrees with me.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:My social studies classes always called it representative republic or constitutional republic.DJjaffacake said:What you described is a direct democracy, the US is a representative democracy, they're two sides of the same coin.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:a democracy is defined as a nation in which citizens vote to determine public action & policy. We don't do that in the USA, we have the citizens elect officials to do that for us.DJjaffacake said:Zachary Amaranth said:ShnipThe USA is a democracy, a representative democracy. A republic is just a country without a monarch, China and North Korea are republics.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Shnip
How does that work if the woman was raped and she doesn't know her rapist or if she has no contact with the man who got her pregnant? Or if it's a case of molestation or something like that? I'm not saying that's a bad idea, on the contrary I LIKE that idea I'm just curious as I've never heard of that. What country was this in(presuming it wasn't in Japan since you said foreign friend)?Frungy said:Finally some food for thought. I live in Japan and an unmarried foreign friend of mine got pregnant. She went to the clinic to get an abortion and was handed a form... which required consent from both the woman AND the man in order to get an abortion. Yup, she couldn't get an abortion unless she got the man's permission too. I was pretty shocked.
OT: Women should have complete right in deciding whether to have the child or not.SeeIn2D said:Alright well I'm sure most people in the US and probably some outside know about all of the abortion stuff going on in the US currently. If you don't then essentially the two major parties are divided on the issue of abortion (like many other issues) with the Democrats supporting the right to choice which basically says women have a right to choose whether they get an abortion or not, and the Republicans are supporting the right to life which basically says that women can't get an abortion.
Question: Do you agree that women should be able to choose or do you think that abortion should be illegal?
Question 2: Do you think that men have a right to help pass or stop a law which prevents abortion?
And my part of the argument is that a man should never pass a law about a woman's body simple as that. I obviously know that there are women in the government in both parties, but the people actually passing the laws will be majority male which I don't think is right. And conversely I don't think women should ever have the right to pass a law regarding a man's body. Anyone agree or disagree with this?
Captcha: whole shebang