canadamus_prime said:
MBergman said:
canadamus_prime said:
MBergman said:
canadamus_prime said:
MBergman said:
On fascism: if we could find a righteous dictator, that would probably be the best form of goverment. Only problem is, they're kind of hard to come by from what I hear.
Discriminating people for their heritage, now that I cannot support. Doesn't make sense to me.
"Righteous dictator" is an oxymoron
I'm sorry, but I'm not familiar with the term, would you please mind explaining?
oxymoron: n. pl. ox·y·mo·ra (-môr'ə, -mōr'ə

or ox·y·mo·rons
A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are combined, as in a deafening silence and a mournful optimist.
According to Dictionary.com
Basically a contradictory statement.
Ah, I see now. Thank you for expanding my vocabulary!
But is it really? Doesn't 'dictator' just mean someone who rules with absolute power? Can he still not be (hypotheticaly) fair and just in his ruling?
He/She may see themselves as righteous, but it's doubtful those under their rule would agree with them. Bedsides I'm reminded of the adage "Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Ah, I believe we have sort of the same view on this, I suppose I express myself a little vaguely. My original point was, that a dictator that could rule as fairly as possible (not only from his own prespective, and you can never please everyone but you get my point) would be the ultimate form of goverment. But also that that spefific dictator is kind of hard to come by since "Absolute power corrupts absolutely" most of the time.
I say most of the time, because somewhere in my romantic mind I still kind of want to think that all people wouldn't be.