Good god yes, a thousand times yes. Shitty, shitty, SHITTY. I really like the books, despite being a bit over-descriptive at times and various other minor faults, but the film was FUCKING AWFUL (sorry for teh sware). The dwarf wasn't even a dwarf. He was just an average man kneeling down with his shoes on his knees. And Arya? This might sound really, really shallow, but I was honestly expecting her to be a LOT prettier than that. In the books she's touted as a cross between Angelina Jolie and Arwen so I was expecting the film to at least hit that hot button (clever puns, oho). Just sigh. And to the LOTR guy, I agree with you on some counts, except that overall I think that LOTR films are the greatest book-film adaptation ever and Tom Bombadil was the most obvious section to cut out of the film because he's at best a side story. He has no relevance whatsoever in the main plot. Also, if they made a true film adaptation of LOTR it would be over seventeen hours long ._.GoldenRaz said:Since Justice Shades has already mentioned HP, I'll go with Eragon of The Inheritence Cycle by Christopher Paolini.
Change the plot at almost every turn? Check. Neglect to introduce several important characters? Check. Make all-in-all lame depictions of pretty much every character that actually gets some screen time? Check.
The only redeeming factor is Jeremy Irons, but even he can't make up for the rest of it.
Rant over, back to lurking