thaluikhain said:
Semi-DemiFiend said:
If we ever get proper hover/flying cars or something like that then it'd most likely be impractical to implement them due to the need for a massive overhaul in both infrastructure and Drivers Ed Classes.
How is a hovercar better than a helicopter, though? People assume they just will be, somehow.
Assuming they use some kinda of anti or counter gravity technology the advantage would be less noise and less maintenance, its bound to be quieter and have less moving parts.
I mean there is little stopping someone from doing the equivalent of strapping four ducted fans and a turbine + drive train into a carbon fibre bodied car analogue. It
could fly, uses existing technology and as high end drones show the hardware and software to simplify control exists.
The running costs would only be outweighed by its huge purchase costs, if only a single thing goes wrong its going to crash. A slight problem with any of its five (at minimum) gearboxes its going to crash, they would need constant maintenance, oil changes and safety inspection. Same for the ducted fans, the turbine and everything else.
Assuming counter gravity technology uses some kind of high energy electromagnetism (enough to use natural minerals and earths magnetic field for example) you have far few moving parts to look after.