xXAsherahXx said:
Lately I keep hearing the argument "If you're really secure with your sexuality, you wouldn't be afraid to (insert girly thing there)"
I don't get that. I really just don't see the correlation. To be more manly, you have to be a woman? Someone explain it to me.
Thoughts? Opinions? Jokes about stereotypes?
(Out of personal curiosity, were any of these arguments you've been hearing lately applied to My Little Pony? I'm just wondering.)
I think there are two camps of thought on this whole subject.
Firstly, you have the traditional camp. The traditional camp dictates that manly things are manly and girly things are girly. You're manly if you have lots of muscle mass, hunt or use firearms regularly. You're girly if you like the colour pink, are free about expressing emotions or enjoy watching My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic (yeah, I went there).
Personally, I think this is kind of immature.
Then there's the second camp, which posits a more mature view of what makes a man. Whereas the previous view presented sort of a binary look at things, the second approach is more . . . gradual, for lack of a better word.
According to the second approach, manliness is less about conforming to a stereotype (be it a lumberjack or a gunslinger) and more about being confident in the choices you make and in yourself. Thus, if you do things that are traditionally not considered manly (dressing in pink, talking about feelings, watching My Little Pony), you are in fact
more manly for doing them because you are confident in yourself.
There's also a simple logic to it: if someone is the manliest man alive, then anything he does would by definition be manly. If he happens to enjoy wearing a pink ballet tutu and dancing around in his spare time, then that act would, by definition, be manly.
TVTropes explains the last bit quite well:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RealMenWearPink