What is the ugliest Pokemon?

Tartarga

New member
Jun 4, 2008
3,649
0
0
Garbodor, hands down. I don't know what the hell they where thinking when they designed that thing.
 

weker

New member
May 27, 2009
1,372
0
0
Muck as god dam that Pokemon is so ugly which is why I love him
 

Phlakes

Elite Member
Mar 25, 2010
4,282
0
41
...Okay, when your OP is the same as the title, you're doing something wrong.

OT: Tepig's evolution are pretty shit. Which is sad, the first one is pretty cute and awesome.
 

subjectseven

New member
Aug 19, 2011
118
0
0
Phlakes said:
...Okay, when your OP is the same as the title, you're doing something wrong.

OT: Tepig's evolution are pretty shit. Which is sad, the first one is pretty cute and awesome.
It's just a substitute for the usual 'title says it all' quote that everyone likes to put there instead. Nothing wrong about it.
 

Shakomaru

New member
May 18, 2011
834
0
0
Pretty much everything in pokemon Quartz, but since that isn't even canon in the slightest, this thing.
 

Phlakes

Elite Member
Mar 25, 2010
4,282
0
41
subjectseven said:
Phlakes said:
...Okay, when your OP is the same as the title, you're doing something wrong.

OT: Tepig's evolution are pretty shit. Which is sad, the first one is pretty cute and awesome.
It's just a substitute for the usual 'title says it all' quote that everyone likes to put there instead. Nothing wrong about it.
Or you could, I don't know, actually put some content in it? Like giving your own answer? One of the six forum rules is "put some effort into your communication".
 

subjectseven

New member
Aug 19, 2011
118
0
0
Phlakes said:
subjectseven said:
Phlakes said:
...Okay, when your OP is the same as the title, you're doing something wrong.

OT: Tepig's evolution are pretty shit. Which is sad, the first one is pretty cute and awesome.
It's just a substitute for the usual 'title says it all' quote that everyone likes to put there instead. Nothing wrong about it.
Or you could, I don't know, actually put some content in it? Like giving your own answer? One of the six forum rules is "put some effort into your communication".
Yeah? Well I decided not to. It's a simple question after all, it doesn't need any additional communication to understand what the thread is about. What if I can't decide and don't have an opinion on what the ugliest Pokemon is yet? That's why I'm asking everyone else, and everyone else is giving perfectly fine answers. Sorry you're unhappy with my post. Guts.
 

Terminate421

New member
Jul 21, 2010
5,773
0
0
Garbadors bad but at least it feels natural (being a mutant)

This thing.....can be a female? UGHUHGUHGUHG!!!!

 

smearyllama

New member
May 9, 2010
3,292
0
0
Well, Samurott was pretty hilariously ugly. It's also one of the most badass designs at the same time.
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
subjectseven said:
Phlakes said:
...Okay, when your OP is the same as the title, you're doing something wrong.

OT: Tepig's evolution are pretty shit. Which is sad, the first one is pretty cute and awesome.
It's just a substitute for the usual 'title says it all' quote that everyone likes to put there instead. Nothing wrong about it.
Plenty wrong with it. You didn't even offer up what you think the ugliest Pokémon is. At the very least you could contribute to your own topic. Why make a thread if you have nothing to say?

On topic, even though there's little point in contributing when the TC doesn't even bother,


I say this because it's not really even a Pokémon. It's just a normal cow. Those gen 2 designers were really god damn lazy and game up with some really shit designs. Pokémon stands for "pocket monsters", not "pocket regular animals".
 

Lizardon

Robot in Disguise
Mar 22, 2010
1,055
0
0
Not counting ones that are trying to be ugly, Palpitoad just looks wrong to me.
 

iLazy

New member
Aug 6, 2011
279
0
0
Black and white's generation of pokemon are all pretty fucking ugly.

But if I had to choose...

Mr. Mine and Jinx. Do not want either of them.