The thing is, George Lucas is prone to coming up with crap ideas. The reason the original trilogy was liked is because people stood up to him and told him when an idea was crap. But when he made the prequels, he had gained this iconic movie-god like status, and everyone was basically too scared to say anything. And thus he was free to write any old crap.
To me, the original trilogy was cheesy, but there was a certain energy and charm to it, and I found them fun to watch. But the new movies were just painfully wooden and lifeless, and it's like they made no effort to make any of the characters even remotely interesting. And it doesn't help that they spent most of the time standing around in front of a green screen (or was it a blue screen?).
I always knew the prequels were a bit meh ... but when I saw the (very long) reviews at Red Letter Media (under Plinkett reviews), I was kinda shocked at just how badly made they really are.
To me, the original trilogy was cheesy, but there was a certain energy and charm to it, and I found them fun to watch. But the new movies were just painfully wooden and lifeless, and it's like they made no effort to make any of the characters even remotely interesting. And it doesn't help that they spent most of the time standing around in front of a green screen (or was it a blue screen?).
I always knew the prequels were a bit meh ... but when I saw the (very long) reviews at Red Letter Media (under Plinkett reviews), I was kinda shocked at just how badly made they really are.