Well I didn't like Demon's Souls, it just seemed so dry, and yeah I do like the Bioware charecters, sure you get the occasional Bioware cliche, guy who is still reeling from the death of his love interest, but for the most part Bioware charecters are well written and they always find good voice actors, except for Shepard's voice actors, wasn't impressed there.tanis1lionheart said:
A thread called "I love advertisments that waste 35 seconds talking about Slim-Jims"?GeorgW said:
Actually, you are not alone^^ My ex-girlfriend says she has more respect for me now that she knows im more or less literally in love with Bolty, than she had before when she thought i was just incapable of expressing any emotion whatsoever...Julianking93 said:Ah yes, well that certainly is cute ^-^CarlMinez said:Yes sir!
Bolt actually. And it's been coming and going for like two years now...
I'm not sure why I find that cute... but I just do >>
Maybe I'm more furry than I think I am :3
Considering there is a whole user group [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/Furrehs] dedicated to furries here, you aren't the closest thing to a furry the Escapist has ever seen. Plus I wouldn't call furries as a topic too much of a problem here, as The Escapist is easily the least anti-furry community I have ever seen that wasn't furry-based to begin with.CarlMinez said:
I hear many people falling in love with game characters(or feel attracted to them(me too)). Those are just as non existed as Bolt. Also when people like actors they like them for the roles they play not the person they are outside the movies they are in(most of the time). So they also fall for the act they play.CarlMinez said:Well, you are obviously among the more tolerant users. But, yeah thats nice to hearBaradiel said:
Nonetheless, I think that most people just thought it too absurd to be true and decided to joke about it - rather than finding any unethical aspect in it.
Ninja'd on the second reply. Under the rules as written, admitting to piracy is not forbidden, only advocating it, but that doesn't stop the mods from smacking people with the banhammer for doing something that is clearly not against any rule, and then turn around and give the okay to people advocating porn, as long as they don't actually post it or link to it, which quite clearly is against the rules as written. It's almost like they ran spellcheck on the new rules, and then didn't proof read them for logical flaws. We also have people admitting to drug use pretty frequently -- often admitting to it being illegal in the country they hail from -- and I have yet to see anyone modded for it, although I have seen a crappy excuse that it's not against the law everywhere. Newsflash: neither is piracy. The only reason it's not an issue is that very few people on this site care about drug use, whereas we have some very vocal members who go out of their way to get pirates banned, and get away scot-free themselves, despite clearly breaking the "jerk" rule.Levi93 said:
No, this one. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.257391-Poll-Commercials]Judgement101 said:
The thing is, bumps have always been prefered making a repeat thread. So I don't see any reason to frown upon it. Unless of course it's bumping for the sake of bumping.ethaninja said:
Actually, I think I got the terminology wrong, as I couldn't find it on google. It was a while ago. Maybe someone else could descipher what I meant.Grabbin Keelz said:
I'm not proud that I know this, but I think you meant "Yiffers" as in, "those who yiff" -- "yiff" or "yiffing" being the term for furry sex. And completely agree about discussing the ads -- it is technically against the rules, but don't ever mention a method of removing the ads aside from joining the pub club, and especially don't admit to using it.GeorgW said:
Paedophelia for sure, that dealio with LegendaryGamer0 was just bullshit.spiffleh said:
