Ren_Li said:
I'm sure they've actually talked about moving it well away from combat and the military, and I believe focusing more on exploration. Which means it will either happen before, or during, the Mass Effect trilogy. (Unless I dreamed that up!)
The endings- as bullshit as they are- are too varied in their potential futures to go forwards. Not only that, but there's our choices for Shepard.
Are there Geth? Are there Quarians? Are there both? Or even neither?
Are the Krogan rebuilding and living productive lives? Are they focussing on war and running rough-shot through the galaxy? Or are they extinct?
Just the outcome of TWO ME3 storylines can have an absolutely massive effect on the future of the galaxy. I can't believe they're unaware of how much it will piss people off to screw around with that; and the potential variables are too huge to make different game scenarios for different ME-trilogy choices.
Eh, a quick wave of the hand of god will fix those and any other problems.
Seriously, they've done it loads of times before. You picked Anderson as the Councillor? Overrulled, you always get Udina in the end. You thought long and hard over whether to save the Rachni Queen back in ME1? N'yeah... turns out that didn't really matter. You killed Wrex? Here's another guy who's much the same. Did you destroy the Collector base, or did you gift it to the Illusive Man? Didn't really matter in the end, did it?
Like I said earlier, if they got really lazy they could solve pretty much any discontinuity problem, up to and including whether or not the entire universe has become an organic-synthetic hybrid with nanobots or space magic or something.
And y'know what? There'd probably be a bit of an uproar, but I'd still play it. And I know I'm far from alone on that.