As we all know E3 had some sequel's to alot of big series, but I find myself thinking: Why do that?
All I'm saying is there are some series (old and new) that could have been better if the later games were done slightly differently, so I ask; What game would you change to improve the series it was in, from first to last, old to new.
My personal oppinion would have been Halo 4, (Just skip this if you've already heard enough about it) I would have had it about the Arbiter, searching for the chief, have him visit old locations like the first halo and reach, maybe harvest, with the end as him actually finding the wreckage.
I feel that would have been a more elegant bridge to a new series (though I dont think we need any more HALO.)
All I'm saying is there are some series (old and new) that could have been better if the later games were done slightly differently, so I ask; What game would you change to improve the series it was in, from first to last, old to new.
My personal oppinion would have been Halo 4, (Just skip this if you've already heard enough about it) I would have had it about the Arbiter, searching for the chief, have him visit old locations like the first halo and reach, maybe harvest, with the end as him actually finding the wreckage.
I feel that would have been a more elegant bridge to a new series (though I dont think we need any more HALO.)