well no ive never had or seen a civilised political/religious conversation ever.
I really try to avoid those types of convos for that reason.
I really try to avoid those types of convos for that reason.
Wicca is a pretty new form of spirituality which is still trying to find its way. A great many Wiccans don't really get their own religion quite yet.FanofDeath said:It's been too long. Religion, for me, is easier to discuss with people who have a solid, monotheistic faith. I tried debating with wiccans, once, they got angry with me.
I'll tell you something; you're one of the most hated stereotypes on the internet. I should know, I used to be that. But then I turned 14, and grew out of it. You deserve less respect than any religion, because you intend to be a disrespectful jerk.Heresy101 said:Again...I'm not saying I'm not hostile. I'm as hostile as they come, so please show me where I inferred the opposite.Angerwing said:Of course I can't make an accurate assessment, seeing as I don't know you, but perhaps you're the cause of hostility? I know more intolerant atheists than I know intolerant Christians. Perhaps when they "refuse to engage on the grounds of hurt feelings or "offense"", they don't want you to attack their religion? From what it sounds like, this isn't two people going into a debate knowing what it's going to be about, then one person backing out randomly due to "offense". Maybe they don't want some random to insult their belief system?
Tolerance and respect are two different things. I tolerate religion every single day, that doesn't mean I automatically have to respect it, and it doesn't mean it is above criticism. My opinion may be an "attack" from their point of view, but it's a defense from mine. Suddenly I'm "strident" because I'm making a valid criticism of their beliefs, when in any other realm of discourse it wouldn't be seen that way at all.
Also, I refute your claim that there are more intolerant atheists than religious people (I know you said "I know" as a personal experience thing, but you used it as an argument for an objective truth). There are far more closet atheists than closet christians, we see christian functions getting government funding where atheist ones don't, christian lobby groups censoring tv shows, etc. Not to mention gay marriage and abortion, the pillars of religious intolerance in a supposedly secular society. Religious intolerance is rampant, to say otherwise is a ludicrous claim.
I'm not talking about "some random", I'm talking about some of my best friends.
I think any debate on religion invariably brings up the scientific method, and the exact nature of what a hypothesis/theory/principle/law/fact is. Sadly, many people distort and mutilate the scientific method. I have seen idiots on this very forum say, "A theory does not become a law. A law describes what happens, a theory describes how it happens."Mysterious Stranger said:When was the last time you ever had a civilized discussion with someone whose beliefs were different from yours? Mine was about six months ago and the subject was abortion. There was a refreshing absence of shouting. I ask because I'm just curious as to whether or not that's possible in this (very partisan) day and age.
Please... leave the bigots alone. No good will come of giving them an excuse to post even more offensive hate speeches.Angerwing said:-snip-
Religion and science have nothing to do with each other. If you are looking for a way to explain worldly phenomena and make useful predictions then you turn to science. If you are looking for spiritual and/or moral direction then science has nothing to say about that. They are two completely different things.RelexCryo said:Sadly, the utter futility of Religious debates largely stems from an almost total ignorance of the scientific method.