Los Angeles. and then I would type some more here because last time I directly answered a question I got moderated for a "low content post"
Also, if an enemy country were going to bomb the US, wouldn't they nuke the major cities? Which include SF and NY? That would leave a pile of rubble as the setting.epninja said:marter said:I'll vote for San Francisco.Either one of these. Both setup for a huge sprawling city. However, since its already been featured in California before, I think NYC is more likely.Enigma6667 said:New York.
*laughs* Silly Bastard, if we did that...it wouldn't be a post apocolyptic game. Don't you know? If any major disaster/problem occurs Australia always remains unaffected and just ignores it. Carrying on as it normally does xD. In other words, it would just be a normal First Person Shooter game..which would still be kinda cool.Milky_Fresh said:Too much post-apocalyptic New York going around, somewhere different. Australia.
parts of china already look like it would after an apocalypseLordMoose said:America and China where the two people taking the heavy swings at eachother.
But did China have any way to defend it's greatest people against the bombs that would fall? Their own vaults and bunkers?
What'd you say we see that going on there, a Brotherhood/Enclave expedition?
So THAT was the boneyard. I was there once, and then had no idea if I was supposed to somehow rope down it or notUltratwinkie said:its gone. LA is a HUGE pit left by a nuke. its now called the boneyard and was already done in fallout 1. bethesda does east coast only, never west coast.ethaninja said:Australia mateNah just kidding, that would be pretty boring. Although Melbourne and Sydney might not be too bad. Anywho, I would like the next one to be in LA. I always wanted to go to LA.
EDIT: at least that's what it looks like on the map. black on black makes it very hard to see what is left, and what is scorched. especially from an aerial view.