Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
Obviously not, don't be absurd!....... We have Metro 2033 as well!JesterRaiin said:Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
So you're implying that the quantity of games taking place in same/similar setting is somehow limited ?Soviet Heavy said:Obviously not, don't be absurd!....... We have Metro 2033 as well!JesterRaiin said:Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
No, I'm not even being really serious. Just joking.JesterRaiin said:So you're implying that the quantity of games taking place in same/similar setting is somehow limited ?Soviet Heavy said:Obviously not, don't be absurd!....... We have Metro 2033 as well!JesterRaiin said:Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
There was a whole and very funny joke there that you missed.Jamie Ruston said:That was The District of ColumbiaDirzzit said:I thought fallout 3 was set in Detroit, you know as a prequel before the bombs fell.Jamie Ruston said:Let's say Detroit.
Motherland it is then !Soviet Heavy said:No, I'm not even being really serious. Just joking.JesterRaiin said:So you're implying that the quantity of games taking place in same/similar setting is somehow limited ?Soviet Heavy said:Obviously not, don't be absurd!....... We have Metro 2033 as well!JesterRaiin said:Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
There's still the problem that most places in Russia were probably nuked during the great war.JesterRaiin said:Motherland it is then !
Rejoice Comrade, we'll teach the rest of world the true meaning of Nuclear Holocaust !
"Wstawaj, strana ogromnaja,
Wstawaj na smiertnyj boj!"
http://lightmachinegunners.weebly.com/uploads/6/5/1/0/6510576/750558.jpg?1303360532
No worries Komrade !Soviet Heavy said:There's still the problem that most places in Russia were probably nuked during the great war.
I would never suggest sacrificing gameplay or story in Fallout, or any game. I merely stated what the franchise was to me and how I would like to see the establishment of a post-apocalyptic society as part of a Fallout game.Ultratwinkie said:The franchise never really relied on the wasteland. It relied on gameplay, story, and isnt critique of human nature. The wasteland is practically irrelevant. Especially since reforestation has been around for over a century. Besides, just because we have civilization doesn't mean it has to be boring. Any look in a history book will tell you that.JaceValm said:Somewhere in central USA perhaps? Also maybe much earlier than previous games?
For me, Fallout needs to step back. Its built up the NCR and the west coast a lot. Perhaps its time to leave it be. Otherwise it will soon become a franchise without a wasteland. So my request to Fallout is: Go back, turn back the clocks to 2100's or very early 2200's. Move away from the coasts and the big factions already built up and start again. Make the wasteland more dangerous and deadly, more of a challenge. Make radiation more prevalent and dangerous. The Mojave desert in F:NV was (in my mind) too similar to the expanses and plains of New Austin in Red Dead Repemption.
Maybe set it in a city? The ruins of DC made a brilliant battleground between man, mutant and everthing in between without comprimising the sense of exploration.
That's BorderlandsMonkeyman O said:Australia. Best thing is, since its already mostly desert full of giant animals wanting to kill you they won't have to use much imagination. Just send one of those robots out with a camera and put it directly into a game.
Thats why I suggested turning the date back too, theres a lot of interesting stuff that can go on. A particular point I like is perhaps going back to the time when the first Vaults opened, your idea it's a critique on human nature would be a great thing to explore with this sort of point. How would Vault Dwellers cope with early life in the wasteland? Whats their reaction to people from other Vaults? Theres a lot of interesting ideas at any point in the Fallout timeline but a community stepping out of the vault and into the unknown wasteland is one I feel could be explored.Ultratwinkie said:Oh crap I just found the "isnt critique" part. I meant to say it IS a critique. I didn't catch that while editing it.JaceValm said:I would never suggest sacrificing gameplay or story in Fallout, or any game. I merely stated what the franchise was to me and how I would like to see the establishment of a post-apocalyptic society as part of a Fallout game.Ultratwinkie said:The franchise never really relied on the wasteland. It relied on gameplay, story, and isnt critique of human nature. The wasteland is practically irrelevant. Especially since reforestation has been around for over a century. Besides, just because we have civilization doesn't mean it has to be boring. Any look in a history book will tell you that.JaceValm said:Somewhere in central USA perhaps? Also maybe much earlier than previous games?
For me, Fallout needs to step back. Its built up the NCR and the west coast a lot. Perhaps its time to leave it be. Otherwise it will soon become a franchise without a wasteland. So my request to Fallout is: Go back, turn back the clocks to 2100's or very early 2200's. Move away from the coasts and the big factions already built up and start again. Make the wasteland more dangerous and deadly, more of a challenge. Make radiation more prevalent and dangerous. The Mojave desert in F:NV was (in my mind) too similar to the expanses and plains of New Austin in Red Dead Repemption.
Maybe set it in a city? The ruins of DC made a brilliant battleground between man, mutant and everthing in between without comprimising the sense of exploration.
I never said civilization was boring, I merely thought it might be a good idea to step back from the established parts of Fallout and make something completely new somewhere else in America.
This must be the third or fourth time we've had a discussion in a Fallout forum, I look forward to the next encounter as I find your perspective on Fallout interesting.
However, the factions themselves are spread pretty far. A lot of the west coast influences spread west, especially since NCR got pretty far. It wasn't until recently when caesar's legion started pushing the NCR back.
The majority of the west coast is covered by tribals retreating from civilization, and countries trying to reclaim land. Ironically, both sides encompass an entire commonwealth. That leaves about 11 unclaimed commonwealths left in America.
So trying to run away from West Coast influence is pretty impossible. It extends as far as Chicago.
They died. That's it, there is nothing. The vaults were made only in America and were built to do human experiments, as they never thought a nuclear fallout would have actually happened.Draenin said:I hope some place, not in America I'd love to see how the rest of the world fared but alas this will not happen.
Just as long as they add horses for travel (mutated or otherwise), a poncho, and a Colt revolver. Then, I could fulfill my dream of being either the Man with No Name or Colonel Mortimer (both from the Dollars Trilogy)BOOM headshot65 said:I vote the midwest. It will look even MORE like the wild west than New Vegas did.
This is probably the greatest thing I have ever heard. EVER. They need to make this... now.Hero in a half shell said:A character named Dorothy gets blasted by the Experimental MIRV and ends up in the land of Oz.
"Those aren't Munchkins, they're just hideously mutated people."
The tin man will be a Brotherhood of Steel Paladin, calling for a powersource instead of oil, the cowardly lion will be a cowardly Deathclaw, and the scarecrow will be a supermutant ("If I only had a reproductive system")