Ask them what they wear on each foot when they go out in the winter.conithegreat said:That canadians say about "aboot" I have been all over Canada and I have never heard a Canadian say "aboot"
Ask them what they wear on each foot when they go out in the winter.conithegreat said:That canadians say about "aboot" I have been all over Canada and I have never heard a Canadian say "aboot"
Ignorance by definition is uneducated, it can be related to stupidity, but being ignorant does not imply stupidity. Granted use of the word 'ignorance' has been slowly becoming the 'nice' way of calling someone stupid; at least in the US. Ignorance can be fixed, stupidity cannot.sinterklaas said:An ignorant person is stupid, an uneducated person does not necessarily have to be stupid.zehydra said:For me, I'd have to say the misconception that Ignorance/Education has anything to do with intellectual ability.
An uneducated/ignorant person isn't necessarily stupid, it would be a mistake to assume so.
I hate people that don't think for themselves.
Hey now, one could just as easily criticize liberals and progressives for supporting policies that have unintended but foreseeable consequences that hurt the very people they purport to help, enacting economic regulations that ultimately give greater power to the large corporations they claim to restrain, conflating opposition to their policies with opposition to their stated goals, being completely ignorant of economic reality by simultaneously viewing wealth and income distribution as zero-sum while otherwise ignoring the fact that all choices involve trade-offs, refusing to admit the trade-offs implicit in the policies they support, falsely assuming that science is capable of making value judgements and that therefore scientific facts necessarily imply specific courses of action, and for their deep abiding faith in centralized planning and concomitant distrust of organic development.icaritos said:Ahhh let me guess, another one who votes conservative simply because of issues like abortion while ignoring their extreme corporatism, refusal to increase taxes under the crisis, destruction of the social services and social nets as well as pushing for the commercialization of every governmental sector.
You do know they don't care about issues like abortion at all right? When they were in power there wasn't a single bill passed or suggested to address the matter, they just pick the rhetoric up in between presidential sections to harness votes, then promptly forget it exists.
Still you haven't answered my question.How do you rationalize all they are doing? Look at the U.S., salaries for middle and lower class have remained stagnant for 30 years while the top 5% flourish, the worst health care and public transport of all the developed nations and every single legislation passed is done with disregard to the middle to lower classes (ban obamacare, support for removal of minimum wage, the Wisconsin fiasco, cuts to science and arts departments, citizens united ruling,endless war support with the exception of people like Ron Paul, etc).
Which is kind of stupid. Look at what happened to the Pound.marcooos said:Thats because we really do not want to be associated with Europe... well the EU at least anywayNimcha said:I find it more annoying when British people call the European mainland just 'Europe', as if they aren't part of it. Sure they may be an island but that really doesn't make them any less European.
Because in Call of Duty: World at War, the playable Germans are Wehrmacht, to be fair it is what they were mostly at the time, but now all the kids that play Call of Duty think that they are historically correct when they say all Germans are nazis.ZeroMachine said:Thinking Europe is just one country is stupidity.
Thinking that the entire country of America works the same even though we have separate states is more ignorance. But, unless you're an American yourself, a more understandable ignorance.
So I'd have to say that first one would annoy me more.
Two things... that generalization annoys me too, but how in the HELL did Call of Duty contribute to that?FirstToStrike said:"ALL GERMANS ARE NAZIS HERP DERP"
Brings my piss to a boil. Stupid Call of Duty...
It's almost impossible to give an average to one ethnic group as diverse as Asians though. We only make up half the world's population. So odds are we will have the world's biggest and smallest dicks, just like we have the world's biggest and smallest people. So of course you are gonna find a larger number of asian dudes with tiny wangs, but you are gonna find an equally large number of asian dudes with big dongs, medium sized dongs, and at least one guy with purple junk.xedi said:Well, not all, but the average size is smaller, so it is not really a misconception. But yeah, asking about it directly is kinda weird.Brian Hendershot said:- Last and by no means least, the idea that all Asians have small penises. I hate people that ask me about that directly at parties. Makes me wanna take it out and slap the fake tan out of them.
What about the Republicans promise half a year ago to block anything President Obama tries to pass in Congress...JUST BECAUSE.Grygor said:Hey now, one could just as easily criticize liberals and progressives for supporting policies that have unintended but foreseeable consequences that hurt the very people they purport to help, enacting economic regulations that ultimately give greater power to the large corporations they claim to restrain, conflating opposition to their policies with opposition to their stated goals, being completely ignorant of economic reality by simultaneously viewing wealth and income distribution as zero-sum while otherwise ignoring the fact that all choices involve trade-offs, refusing to admit the trade-offs implicit in the policies they support, falsely assuming that science is capable of making value judgements and that therefore scientific facts necessarily imply specific courses of action, and for their deep abiding faith in centralized planning and concomitant distrust of organic development.icaritos said:Ahhh let me guess, another one who votes conservative simply because of issues like abortion while ignoring their extreme corporatism, refusal to increase taxes under the crisis, destruction of the social services and social nets as well as pushing for the commercialization of every governmental sector.
You do know they don't care about issues like abortion at all right? When they were in power there wasn't a single bill passed or suggested to address the matter, they just pick the rhetoric up in between presidential sections to harness votes, then promptly forget it exists.
Still you haven't answered my question.How do you rationalize all they are doing? Look at the U.S., salaries for middle and lower class have remained stagnant for 30 years while the top 5% flourish, the worst health care and public transport of all the developed nations and every single legislation passed is done with disregard to the middle to lower classes (ban obamacare, support for removal of minimum wage, the Wisconsin fiasco, cuts to science and arts departments, citizens united ruling,endless war support with the exception of people like Ron Paul, etc).
In short, put the kool-aid down and step out of the echo chamber, because conservatives are not the source of all that is bad in American politics, nor is the left the sole locus of good.
To wit:
Obamacare is a deeply flawed policy, sold to the public as health-care reform even though it only reforms health coverage. As a community-rated, guaranteed-issue, forced-participation system, it is effectively a tax on young and healthy people to subside older and unhealthy people (and while one can make arguments in support of that, it's simply not possible when the bill's supporters refused to even admit that inconvenient fact). Furthermore, by expanding medical coverage, the bill necessarily increases demand for medical services - but since the bill does nothing to address the limited supply of medical care in this country, medical costs will have to go up, and if they are not allowed to, the net result will be a shortage of medical care.
Research has shown time and time again that the minimum wage ultimately reduces employment, particularly youth employment, and in the long run also reduces the wages paid to unskilled laborers.
Citizens United v. FEC is widely and almost willfully misunderstood by the American left, who seem to impart an almost magical power over elections to money, far in excess of it's actual influence.
As far as "endless war", need I point out that Obama has continued Bush's wars and added one of his own, and continues essentially all of Bush's wartime policies? That Clinton had has own wars? That the overwhelming majority of wars the US has fought since the start of the 20th century have been fought by Democratic administrations? That the power to wage war ultimately resides in Congress, which has been controlled by the Democratic party for most of the last 100 years?
First and foremost, do not take words out of my mouth. I never once said, or in any form implied that the left is the solo perpetrator of good while the right are demons. In fact I have been severely (and more importantly consistently) disappointed by the actions takes by the party. Obama made many promises that he either ignored or otherwise failed to follow up on for the sake of bipartisanship. However I cannot ignore the right, who at this point does not even fake interest in the social conditions of the country. You criticize the left for placing too much power of judgement (am I right to imply morality here?) on science (which I'd argue is a far better judge them religion could ever hope to be), yet the right places an almost mystical belief on the power of an unregulated free market.Grygor said:Hey now, one could just as easily criticize liberals and progressives for supporting policies that have unintended but foreseeable consequences that hurt the very people they purport to help, enacting economic regulations that ultimately give greater power to the large corporations they claim to restrain, conflating opposition to their policies with opposition to their stated goals, being completely ignorant of economic reality by simultaneously viewing wealth and income distribution as zero-sum while otherwise ignoring the fact that all choices involve trade-offs, refusing to admit the trade-offs implicit in the policies they support, falsely assuming that science is capable of making value judgements and that therefore scientific facts necessarily imply specific courses of action, and for their deep abiding faith in centralized planning and concomitant distrust of organic development.icaritos said:Ahhh let me guess, another one who votes conservative simply because of issues like abortion while ignoring their extreme corporatism, refusal to increase taxes under the crisis, destruction of the social services and social nets as well as pushing for the commercialization of every governmental sector.
You do know they don't care about issues like abortion at all right? When they were in power there wasn't a single bill passed or suggested to address the matter, they just pick the rhetoric up in between presidential sections to harness votes, then promptly forget it exists.
Still you haven't answered my question.How do you rationalize all they are doing? Look at the U.S., salaries for middle and lower class have remained stagnant for 30 years while the top 5% flourish, the worst health care and public transport of all the developed nations and every single legislation passed is done with disregard to the middle to lower classes (ban obamacare, support for removal of minimum wage, the Wisconsin fiasco, cuts to science and arts departments, citizens united ruling,endless war support with the exception of people like Ron Paul, etc).
In short, put the kool-aid down and step out of the echo chamber, because conservatives are not the source of all that is bad in American politics, nor is the left the sole locus of good.
To wit:
Obamacare is a deeply flawed policy, sold to the public as health-care reform even though it only reforms health coverage. As a community-rated, guaranteed-issue, forced-participation system, it is effectively a tax on young and healthy people to subside older and unhealthy people (and while one can make arguments in support of that, it's simply not possible when the bill's supporters refused to even admit that inconvenient fact). Furthermore, by expanding medical coverage, the bill necessarily increases demand for medical services - but since the bill does nothing to address the limited supply of medical care in this country, medical costs will have to go up, and if they are not allowed to, the net result will be a shortage of medical care.
Research has shown time and time again that the minimum wage ultimately reduces employment, particularly youth employment, and in the long run also reduces the wages paid to unskilled laborers.
Citizens United v. FEC is widely and almost willfully misunderstood by the American left, who seem to impart an almost magical power over elections to money, far in excess of it's actual influence.
As far as "endless war", need I point out that Obama has continued Bush's wars and added one of his own, and continues essentially all of Bush's wartime policies? That Clinton had has own wars? That the overwhelming majority of wars the US has fought since the start of the 20th century have been fought by Democratic administrations? That the power to wage war ultimately resides in Congress, which has been controlled by the Democratic party for most of the last 100 years?