Who would win? Batman or Spiderman

Recommended Videos

Buizel91

Autobot
Aug 25, 2008
5,262
0
0
now i know these 2 characters are from different comics, but how awesome would a battle be between them, personally i think Batman's gadgets and brute strength could take out Spiderman because compared to most, Spiderman is quite weak and relies on speed, but what do you guys think?

also in my opinion Batman is a normal guy, in a suite, who takes out mutant, psycho people, he fights Killer Croc, Bane, Poison Ivy, and the best of the all, the Joker, where as Spiderman usually needs help from black cat or someone to defeat his enemies.

Spiderman just seems...weak to me and that's why i think batman would win =)
 

MercenaryCanary

New member
Mar 24, 2008
1,776
0
0
NO VERSUS THREADS!

And Spider-man would win, as he is actually has fucking super powers.
Batman just has techno-badassery.
Spidey could easily catch up.
http://img.timeinc.net/recipes/i/recipes/su/05/05/pineapple-su-682741-l.jpg
arc1991 said:
Spiderman is quite weak and relies on speed
Spidey isn't weak. Lifting about 5 (literal) tons of steel, while weakened and bruised and battered, must qualify as weak then. Because thats exactly what he did once.

This is why we don't have versus threads.
 

Lullabye

New member
Oct 23, 2008
4,424
0
0
no vs thre.......oh why even bother.

Batman, because spider has to deal with "morals" and puberty and such....
 

WolfThomas

Man must have a code.
Dec 21, 2007
5,291
0
0
Batman. Spiderman could beat him if he was smart enough and relied heavily on his spider senses to predict batman mans every move while agilely swinging circles around him. But of course he wouldn't do that, he would more likely swing down make a quip about batman "I thought Spiderman was a silly name!", shoot one web at batman, then be suprised when Batman cuts through the web and breaks his nose.
 

XJ-0461

New member
Mar 9, 2009
4,512
0
0
Spider-man? Weak? WEAK? Tell me you are joking. He can lift 10 tons, whereas Batman is only as strong as the stongest normal human can be.

In spite of this, Batman could win with preparation time. But in a fight after a sudden encounter between the two, it would be pretty even.

On topic: No Vs threads.
 

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
Look, let's be honest with ourselves: This comic actually happened once. They teamed up, because they're both super heroes. They'd have no reason to be fighting.

Also, what are you, dense? Retarded? He's the GODDAMN BATMAN.


Someone had to.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
I see little wrong with Vs. threads for the most part. Hey face it, we're all huge nerds, and this is one of the things nerds do.

Strictly speaking I do not think the two would fight each other as I'm pretty sure they have teamed up in company crossovers in the past.

When dealing with Batman in paticular, it all depends on the circumstances of the fight. In general Batman and Iron Man (marvel) both have a habit of losing the first round against many of their more powerful enemies. Then they go back to their base, and gadgeteer a solution to whatever beat them/drove them off so they win in the end.

Ironically though people tend to forget that Spider-Man is ALSO a gadgeteer and while it's not as typical for him, he does the exact same thing. He'll like lose a fight, get a skin or bloody sample (or whatever) head to the high school (or college) chem lab and whip up a serum or whatever to help him. I do think he's generally on a lower "tier" of gadgeteering though.

In a straight up fight, based on an initial encounter I think Spidey would win. In an overall context of who wins a "war" made up of multiple encounters... well that would probably be Batman as he maxxes out higher on the "able to adapt to opponents" chart.


As far as Batman beating Superman with kryptonite, that's debatable (in response to come of the comments). People tend to referance what they have heard about the old "Dark Knight Returns" storyline by Frank Miller. The thing is though that for those who read the book, it's stated very specifically that Superman threw the fight. In fact that is what the entire story was leading up to. It appeared that Batman knocked him out, and then died from cardiac arrest after winning. However Superman made it quite clear that he was playing possum and what's more could tell that Batman's heart was still working. So basically what Batman did was insufficient including the use of Kryptonite.


More recent events within the actual DC continuity have Batman using kryptonite to win quick scuffles. A sucker punch with a kryptonite ring, or a plan stolen from him by Ra's Al Ghul being implemented by The League Of Assasins in "Tower Of Babel". It should however be noted that both stategies involved surprise attacks (like most villains who used Kryptonite on Super Man). In general people tend to forget that unless you can get it into proximity with him Kryptonite isn't anything other than a fance rock. What's more Superman has in the past used powered armor and radiation suits to deal with it when he knew what he was up against (or at least I vaguely remember him doing so). So really if Superman ever TRUELY desired to take out Batman, he knows Batman has Kryptonite and would plan accordingly. Heck, he might just send a Superman robot double (one of the things people tend to forget about, Superman is a scientific genius w/ access to alien tech to boot, and has been making robots and stuff since he was Superboy).

To be honest this is not to say that Batman couldn't beat him, I mean heck Lex Luthor who has no powers of his own either had won rounds against Superman, and almost killed him on like a billion occasions (Superman has needed to be rescued by other heroes... a lot). But to be frank he wouldn't be able to do it in a typical Batman fashion. He'd pretty much have to set a trap and genuinely catch Supes by surprise.
 

SomethingUnrelated

New member
Aug 29, 2009
2,855
0
0
Batman, because he's got better movies.

In all honesty, he's way better equipped. Spiderman may have actual powers to his advantage, but Batman would find a way.
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,102
0
0
Well, they are pretty matched on intelligence (Don't forget that Peter Paker is a scientific genius and made his web shooters and spider tracers himself).

That said, Spiderman would give Batman a run for his money due to him having the proportionate strength, speed, and agility of a spider (not to mention his spider sense).

Then again, Batman has the Batmobile, so I'm going to deem this toss up a tie where they both decide they are equally awesome, then go to beat up the Green Goblin and Bane. And they leave just in time for the next cage match: Apocalypse VS Galactus.