Who's Ready for The Emoji Movie?

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
09philj said:
How does it feel to be an art critic living in a world where both this and Norm of the North exist?
I think this is one of those times when a .gif sums it up.

https://s30.postimg.org/kkmxesx8h/Crying.gif
 

Bob_McMillan

Elite Member
Aug 28, 2014
5,421
2,045
118
Country
Philippines
Just... wow.

On the bright side Marter, after watching this, you'd be happy to watch whatever mediocre films are sure to follow it.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
14,955
3,830
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
Ugh, they canceled Lauren Faust's Medusa for this. LAUREN FAUST! She made mlp awesome, let her make awesome things.
 

MeatMachine

Dr. Stan Gray
May 31, 2011
597
0
0
THE EMOJI MOVIE! Featuring a character who is catatonically bored and a literal pile of shit!

Give us your money and we will entertain you!
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
I don't know what everyone is going on about. This movie seems to have an awesome pedigree. How can this be bad?
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
Who is this even marketed towards? Kids too young to have cell phones or social media accounts? Teenagers who will feel glee at being "above" it?

The only thing I can imagine is that this is a back-door effort to make people who feel the need to do all their self-expression through emojis feel bad about themselves

[sub]In which case I can't say I entirely disapprove. But still.[/sub]
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
 

Antonio Torrente

New member
Feb 19, 2010
869
0
0
Hawki said:
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
Maybe because it's made by Sony Pictures who people wants to just die already with all the bullshit they been doing for the past years, case in point Amazing Spider-Man, Pixel(or any Adam Sandler movie) and Barbie with Amy Schumer.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,175
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Antonio Torrente said:
Hawki said:
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
Maybe because it's made by Sony Pictures who people wants to just die already with all the bullshit they been doing for the past years, case in point Amazing Spider-Man, Pixel(or any Adam Sandler movie) and Barbie with Amy Schumer.
Except this movie is being made by Sony Animation, which is a subsiduary of Sony (Pictures), not the company itself, and would have had nothing to do with those films you mentioned. Looking at said subsiduary, they seem to have done decently critically, even if some of their best work was done in conjunction with Ardman. I can only comment personally on Goosebumps (actually pretty good), but, yeah. An emoji movie sounds silly, but no more so than a lot of other ideas in animation.
 

Bedinsis

Elite Member
Legacy
Escapist +
May 29, 2014
1,640
830
118
Country
Sweden
Hawki said:
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
I'm with you. I mean, Sad-Emoji of the trailer is an animated constantly depressed character, compare that with Eeyore of Winnie the Pooh or Marvin from the Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy; people like those characters. Besides, Inside Out had as lead characters five characters who are literal representations of five primary emotions; that was a beloved film.

So as long as they tie the emoji characters with a resonant, emotional core I basically think it could work. Though this trailer leaves a lot to be desired.
 

sagitel

New member
Feb 25, 2012
472
0
0
Hawki said:
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
emojis are associated with the same demographics who all post 100+ things a day in social networks, who use a lot of emojis, follow all the usual stupid fads religiously, and all the shebang.
so normally people dont like them.
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
Hawki said:
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
It's because Emojis are seen as a fad. Its gonna date this movie big time.
 

CaitSeith

Formely Gone Gonzo
Legacy
Jun 30, 2014
5,374
381
88
Hawki said:
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
The line was crossed when they made talking angry birds. This is just getting deeper in the cesspool of mediocrity.
 

Groxnax

New member
Apr 16, 2009
563
0
0
Ok, how high were the people who greenlight and then made this waste of time and money... and CPU/memory?

Can't wait to see my favorite movie critics rip this one up and use it as toilet paper.

Yeesh, someone slap some sense into these people.
 

Lieju

New member
Jan 4, 2009
3,044
0
0
I heard about this movie a while ago and I swear, I thought it already came out.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
Hawki said:
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
To take the question seriously:

Talking animals have a long and rich history in literature, folklore, and fairy tales. Seeing creators try to put a new spin on an old tradition isn't inherently unwelcome.

Real toy brands do get a lot of grief for their perceived crass commercialism, something a movie like "The Lego Movie" had to overcome (and brands like Transformers, GI Joe, Bratz, and Battleship arguably failed to accomplish). Something like "Toy Story", by comparison, is about a whole lot of other themes tied into the characters being toys; loyalty, mortality, jealousy, grief.

Talking food has had two films I'm aware of; one was almost universally panned, the other used that as a springboard for jokes and an analogy for mortality and human response to it.

The Internet and electronic worlds are where so much of so many people's lives occur today that a movie taking place in same seems barely more odd than a movie taking place in, say, Sweden.

Aside from the trendiness others have mentioned and the associated resentment, emojis are almost inherently anti-depth, anti-character. They are the purveyors of shallow sentiments and facile opinions; l33t-speak, phn abbrvs (c u l8r) and 140 character limit tweets declared too wordy, ponderous and time-consuming to be countenanced. Even at their best, they're only emphasis for actual words, little more than extended punctuation.

Imagine a full-length movie about exclamation point, if you will. (Hey, movie producers: have I got an idea to sell you. I've even got a title: "Full Stop". Call me.)

Every idea you've mentioned has had some clever jokes attached. This idea seems doomed to be saddled with eggplant sex jokes at best; the kind of jokes that aren't even _really_ jokes at all, just, "Hey, it's 'thing'! Remember 'thing'? Laugh, now, because you recognize 'thing'!"

So, to my mind, that's why. It's a movie inherently attached- burdened- with a concept that is anti-character, anti-wit, anti-depth, anti-story. It is what people turn to when they don't want to tell you about their day, explain their opinion on the new music album, express their feelings at length. A picture worth only about five to ten words, when you're ready to settle for less.

And you know, I think you might even be able to make a halfway decent movie about emojis being frustrated by such limitations.

But this will not be that movie.
 

klaynexas3

My shoes hurt
Dec 30, 2009
1,525
0
0
Hawki said:
Okay, I'll be honest, I really don't get the hatred for this film.

That's not to say it looks good, mind you, but, what, is talking emojis somehow crossing some invisible line? Talking toys, talking animals, talking food, films set in videogame worlds/the Internet/cyberspace/whatever is fine, but emojis is one leap of faith too many? And thanks to YouTube links, it at least looks a bit more tolerable than Despicable Me 3.
I think it stems from us being bad people honestly. A lot of people enjoy watching a train wreck happen, and a fair amount of people today are cynical, so we tend to find something to bash on whether fairly or even with great gusto. Case in point, look at /v/. Sure, you can say the rest of the internet isn't like them exactly, but they are still a good indicator that people just enjoy tearing something down, especially if it also makes them look smarter or superior for having spot out the failure before it was even released. This however can cause a lot of tension, taking /v/ as another example, you can see with all the Final Fantasy XV threads that almost every discussion about it is how it's the greatest Final Fantasy of all time, or the "BLUNDER OF THE CENTURY," and the threads will continue to be this way until the next big release. Many people don't like the things that they like to be trash talked, because it reflects badly on them, so people will adamantly defend what they enjoy just so they don't seem to have poor taste.

Now, for the case of the Emoji movie, so many people that frequent these sorts of forums are heavily disillusioned to many things that are seen as trendy, whether it's boy bands, Call of Duty, or the heavy use of emojis. People at a movie studio have decided to make a movie on something that is seen as nothing more than a passing trend. There are few reasons as to why one might make a movie about emojis, other than simply to just make money. It's a simple target for people, so everyone can band together to hate on this one thing. It's shooting fish in a barrel, it doesn't really mean anything, it's just satisfying.