Hitokiri_Gensai said:
he is considered one of the great unifiers of Japan. Although Nobunaga himself never became Shogun, he still held considerable power over most of Japan. He is the Destroyer, to Hideyoshi's Peace and Ieyasu's administration.
In his youth, Nobunaga was known to be somewhat unstable, even alienating some of his retainers. Nobunaga was a ruthless ruler, and was known to even have slaughtered the Monks of Mt. Hiei, because they so armed themselves and defied his rule, even going as far as burning Enryaku-Ji and killing thousands, even women and children. Still without his iron fist, the unification of Japan would have taken much longer.
Yah, he did the ground work for the ultimate unification, while Toyotomi furthered it and made sure it wouldn't fall to bits, and Tokugawa just took advantage of both and founded his dynasty. Sure, opportunistic but still, very well played. I think there's a saying about Oda pounding the rice, Toyotomi kneading the dough, while Tokugawa eats the cake.
Anyway, I knew that Nobunaga was rather... unhinged, especially in his youth, I think it started with his father's death, which he took rather badly. His chief retainer had to commit suicide for Nobunaga's behaviour at the funeral. Still, true, he was ruthless, but in that day and age (politics and all the back-stabbing that came with it being rife) could he realistically have been half a successful if he wasn't that ruthless? And you can't really doubt his military talents (the ambush at
Okehazama being the example that comes to mind).
And for his less... pleasant actions,
Enryaku-Ji was all the more troubling for the wanton destruction of a cultural icon as well. Most of his sieges invariably ended in slaughter, but I don't think he's any worse than some of the 'great leaders' of the west in that regard (for one reason or another the
Sack of Magdeburg comes to mind). Deplorable it may be, but such is war... *sigh*