\Evidencebased said:Well, this really is the perfect illustration of how male gamers are just getting het up about losing their "boys club" privileges isn't it?RelexCryo said:aks100 said:snip
Many gaming males are defensive because they have been aggressively attacked in previous years. Both verbally, with us being called adoslecent for liking fanservice in the first place, and in a more physical way, with many of our games switching from fanservice characters to realistic physiques. The gaming industry, rather than moving towards greater diversity, is moving towards destroying one thing while creating another. Tifa Lockheart and Lara Croft used to have huge breasts for example. Now they don't. Rather than creating new female characters with athletic physiques, they took fanservice characters and rewrote them to have more athletic physiques.
Rather than moving towards greater diversity, Square Enix simply destroyed male fanservice and tried to recreate the characters to be less likely to annoy certain people. Greater diversity would ultimately require making both fanservice for men, and realistic, athletic women. The industry, rather than including both, is making a move towards exclusively having realistic, athletic women.
Gamer males who like voluptuous women are having the games they like taken away from them. Diversity does not bother gamer males, being verbally attacked and having what you possess taken away from you does. And after several years of being told that the games we like are "bad" and that they should not exist, and several more years of the games we like being taken away from us, many gamer males who like these games have become defensive.
Simply allowing fanservice games while simultaneously making games with realisticly shaped female protagonists would not bother us.Paragraphs and paragraphs about the cruelty of game designers, stealing all those boobies. Sure, they aren't actually doing anything of the sort (as illustrated above) but it feels like the world is a less boobyiful place, and that's what counts! And sure, you can still get more porn than you could watch in a lifetime absolutely free -- plenty of large breasts there -- but that would require the imposition of opening a second browser tab! Woe. Most fascinating of all is that this supposed shift towards less fanservice is literally seen as an "aggressive attack" and is even characterized as "physical" ... the pain of having to look at a female character who can stand upright without a backbrace is comparable to physical assault? My, my, we feminists are definitely the whiny ones here. 9.9
No one is "taking away" games; at best, the ratio of [total fanservice] to [slightly decent female characters] might be improving slightly, but no one is tearing your Lara Croft games away from your sadly groping hands. If the rate at which fanservicey games are made is slightly decreased (which I'm not convinced it is) that's still not actually a loss at all. Furthermore, characters aren't a zero sum game, and making more good female characters won't require that you remove any of the "bad" ones (and really, was someone on this thread trying to get rid of Lara Croft? I don't think so) But if you're proposing that the (majority male) game designers are creating slightly fewer impossibly stacked women, perhaps that's just because not every guy needs giant boobies to make him like a game? And some of them are tired of pandering to the lowest common denominator? You can't blame women for adult men choosing to create more mature and realistic games.
I apologize, I meant the word, "tangible." Not "Physical." And the fact it is not a zero sum game, yet is being treated as a zero sum game anyways, is my point. We can have diversity, yet many people seem to be attacking fan service itself, rather than accepting diversity. This creates defensive thinking.