The psychological aspect I don't want to touch because it's whatever model you ascribe to viewing. It could easily be argued that the types of people with underlying psychotic issues are more likely to break taboo and therefore smoke weed, in which case it's easy to blame the drug.XinfiniteX said:It's not practical because you'd have pot heads running round town saying they are depressed and need weed to cure them. And if it was practical you would think the test would have moved into actual application... Also I'm pretty sure I had a whole section on how marijuana can set of underlying psychological conditions over long periods of use. I'm pretty sure thats a negative effect. Oh and I never once stated "he "killing of braincells" or that it's bad for you in direct ways besides that of smoke+lungs=bad."
Testing takes a long time, especially in the medical industrial complex in north America, and funding is prohibitively expensive. Most of these studies won't make it past the initial stages due to lack of funding. No one funds where they can't make money, and what's practical isn't necessarily what's profitable.
Why should we care if pot-heads run amok getting prescription for marijuana? Good for them. I think people should do what they want and don't think people using marijuana openly is a reason to prosecute it when it could be very beneficial.