Because the villain has a grudge on said Earth?
Possibly for not accepting his scientific discoveries?
Possibly for not accepting his scientific discoveries?
Probably, they stole half of their materials from Star Wars, which Star Wars stole from various sourcesAltorin said:it doesn't matter if an idea has been used before, it can still be used to tell an interesting narrative.Delta4845 said:SeymourThe Iron Ninja said:Because the villian sees the rest of the world as corrupted and weak, and wants to create a pure world.
KefkaOr
Because the villian is completely insane and wants to see what the end of the world would look like.
I'm sure those archetypes were used before Final Fantasy Floated in and tagged them.
Using FF to describe said ArchetypesThe Iron Ninja said:Who?Delta4845 said:SeymourThe Iron Ninja said:Because the villian sees the rest of the world as corrupted and weak, and wants to create a pure world.
KefkaOr
Because the villian is completely insane and wants to see what the end of the world would look like.
Maybe the villain wants to destroy the world because it is too sinful and must be 'purged' before it can be 'reborn.'Technomage333 said:I am slowly but surely working on a custom campaign for nwn2 and am currently planning my story. Despite how cheesy it sounds I think for a D&D type story saving the world is an acceptable final goal. But to save the world there must be someone who wants to destroy it and that someone must have a reason.
So my question is if you were a villain why would you want to go kill a whole bunch of people? It could be absolutely anything! From becoming a god to revenge to I don't even know!
If you're a hero, and there was someone claiming to want to destroy the world, and another planning on painting it purple and throwing pies at it, which would you focus your attention on stopping?Technomage333 said:So why would you destroy because it's there versus paint it bright purple or throw pies at it because it's there?
Depends what you define as bat shit crazy, tbh half the world can be classified as bat shit crazy in one way or another.runtheplacered said:But couldn't you just sort of wrap that up as "The villain is batshit crazy"? I see where you're coming from, though.jasoncyrus said:On the contrary, a good writer can give shape and reason to that mindless violence also. example: you have a city of hostages. you need to interrogate the hero/force him to do something or you start killing people. you COULD kill them one by one, but you're impatient and kill whole city blocks at a time because you are bored and want it done NOW.runtheplacered said:Because that would make for an incredibly flat villain. Good writers can do better then that.crimson5pheonix said:Why do villians need reason? Why not have your bad guy kill for the fun of killing.
theres reason behind all senseless killings![]()
more or less that or "I want to see the purrty colors!" - this would be a good villainShadow Tyrant said:"Because it's there."
That raises the question can Utilitarionism be evil?RufusMcLaser said:There was a twist in the second Ringworld book in which the only way to save an unimaginable number of people was to kill several million (or was it billion?) of them. You could create a fairly sympathetic villain who is acting with similar motives.