Pointless? Pfft, call me when pixels are the size of atoms.cambodiancam said:Why would they need to get better there already amazing anything more would be pointless. Also Ive never heard this said before either soo.
It hasn't, but we're at the start of a recession, so getting slightly better graphics probably isn't at the top of everyone's to-do list. Also, the changes aren't going to be as dramatic now as they were in the SNES->PSX->Dreamcast->360 leaps. Recently, improvements hve been more about refinement now than adding new tricks. There are promising new developments, but I think we'll need a bigger hardware leap than ever to see dramatically better results - diminishing returns after all.Stevedave00 said:I've heard many say "They can't get much better" why not?
Call me when you try to run that in any system. Well maybe in a couple of years, I would only hope the technology will be cheap =D...Nimbus said:Pointless? Pfft, call me when pixels are the size of atoms.cambodiancam said:Why would they need to get better there already amazing anything more would be pointless. Also Ive never heard this said before either soo.
Because it's unnecessary and too damn expensive for us.Stevedave00 said:I've heard many say "They can't get much better" why not?
It hasn't ended, but you look at Crysis on max and tell me where you could gain a worthwhile improvement.Stevedave00 said:I've heard many say "They can't get much better" why not?
I agree with The Tygerfire. At a certain point better graphics began to cost too much for what people were willing to pay. And if peoples computer can't run the game it won't sell. I don't think the Graphics race has ended all together though, but it has been slowed down considerably but the fact that most people don't want to upgrade.TheTygerfire said:Because it's unnecessary and too damn expensive for us.Stevedave00 said:I've heard many say "They can't get much better" why not?