But if the parent of a baby found the baby's crying to be cute, wouldn't the parent be unmotivated to alleviate the baby's distress? Finding a baby's cry to be annoying is a much better motivator to care for it.FieryTrainwreck said:That's because it's not your baby, so you're competitive desire to pass on your own (and only your own) genetic material has you more inclined to kill and eat the thing than care for it.likalaruku said:I think human babies make Uncle Fester look cute, but I sure do like baby animals.
When a human baby cries; it's annoying. When a baby animal squeaks for attention/food; it's addorable.
You are not in direct genetic competition with non-humans, so baby animals are cute.
Heh, I probably WOULD eat a baby. "Try everything once" they say.FieryTrainwreck said:That's because it's not your baby, so you're competitive desire to pass on your own (and only your own) genetic material has you more inclined to kill and eat the thing than care for it.likalaruku said:I think human babies make Uncle Fester look cute, but I sure do like baby animals.
When a human baby cries; it's annoying. When a baby animal squeaks for attention/food; it's addorable.
You are not in direct genetic competition with non-humans, so baby animals are cute.
What he said, a lot of it is reflected on what is written in our DNA and animal instinct that we are meant to find 'cute' as part of the parental defensive instinct.Avaholic03 said:Studies have been done. It has to do with the proportions of an infant triggering maternal/paternal instincts, so if other things remind us of those proportions (generally, larger eyes, small delicate features, etc.) then we're programmed to find them "cute".
WOW, I just noticed how many people hate human babies...wow, evolution f*&(ed up this time. (lol)OmegaXzors said:Honestly, I don't find babies to be cute in any manner whatsoever. They drool over themselves, defecate and urinate upon themselves, and are just disgustingly riddled little beings. Sure, you may argue that they can't help it, but it doesn't argue with the fact that baby puppies and kittens are way fucking cuter than a nasty little human child.
Thats weird because I find the Arbiter cute, and he doesn't conform to any "cute-ness" in standard human infant forms, small eyes, odd long legs, dangerous weapons... all are things that human babies seem to lack.Vrex360 said:What he said, a lot of it is reflected on what is written in our DNA and animal instinct that we are meant to find 'cute' as part of the parental defensive instinct.Avaholic03 said:Studies have been done. It has to do with the proportions of an infant triggering maternal/paternal instincts, so if other things remind us of those proportions (generally, larger eyes, small delicate features, etc.) then we're programmed to find them "cute".
This is true, it is not our evolution, it is THEIRS.624 said:Parasitic creatures have evolved to have pleasant forms that reminds of our human kin (which we are obligated to protect to further our species) so we naturally feel like we want (or have to) care for them. This is a theoretical statement I thought of just now.
Damn. Ninja'd by the first reply.poiumty said:Because to identify if said "stuff" is a baby we look at several parameters such as head/eye size, head/body ratio and so forth. These parameters can be applied to more than one creature, therefore if stuff has baby features (and possibly some others we've grown to like), our mind instantly recognizes it as cute.