Why do people seem to think Gamepads are better than KB+M?

Recommended Videos

otakon17

New member
Jun 21, 2010
1,338
0
0
BigTuk said:
It depends on the game and the person. Really. For FPS, Fighting, and RTS games the KB+M is preferred ... for Racing and platforming games... the gamepad. TBS games can go either way.

The biggest advantage of KB+M is customization. One of the biggest complaints I've had about controllers is they make assumption as to dominant hand. That's why the d-pad is always on the left side... and for most times this is good but for myself in fighting games.. I prefer to have the directional controls mapped to my right hand. YOu can't do that with a controller. you can however do that in near about any PC game.
Okay, how do you figure a KB+M is better for a FIGHTING game?
 

Strelok

New member
Dec 22, 2012
494
0
0
Mr Fixit said:
Speaking specifically about shooters I always felt that KB+M made them too easy, it's just point & click death. It just feels like cheating to me. It's fine for other games, but I guess I'm comfortable with either setup for any game because I've never limited myself to either pc or console exclusively.
ROFL!!!! There would be far less rage quitters in Red Orchestra 2 if this were true. Never heard his one before, it's a good one. Just curious, aim assist on controllers? Perfectly normal? Not cheating at all? It's like I've gone through the looking glass seriously.

On Topic: You will find that the most adamant supporters of controllers are better, are usually console fanboys, in my experience anyway. They find themselves getting really good with a controller seemingly unaware that aim assist, as mentioned above, even exists on consoles, and in fact is a requirement for most FPS games to be even playable.
 

Whitbane

Apathetic...
Mar 7, 2012
266
0
0
Some RPG/Action games work better with a controller, like Darksiders, but inventory management is usually a pain in the ass. Open world movement feels better on a controller, as just holding W and Shift to sprint gets tiring.

Mouse and Keyboard are great for everything else, and I pray for the souls of the poor people who try to play PC shooters with controllers. It's a deliberate handicap.
 

The Lunatic

Princess
Jun 3, 2010
2,291
0
0
To answer the original question.

Because people are wrong.

It is not a subjective thing. Keyboard and mouse offers a faster and more accurate input.

There's no debate to this.

Some games "Feel" better with a controller. It's subjective. And that's fine, if you prefer it, that's not an issue, nor are you somehow "Inferior" for liking it.

But, it's incorrect to think it's faster or more accurate in any capacity.

From a purely technical point of view, a keyboard and mouse is better.
 

mysecondlife

New member
Feb 24, 2011
2,142
0
0
With my current living arrangement, playing with KB and M takes a lot of effort.

I play videogames in a small room I share with my friend. My friend takes up most of the room because he's been there longer than I have.

Because there is very little room for solid surface to place my keyboard and mouse, controllers are how I play my games.

So yeah, controllers are better for me at this moment because I can play with it while sitting, lying on my bed. That goes the same with console over PC as well.
 

SmallHatLogan

New member
Jan 23, 2014
613
0
0
The Lunatic said:
To answer the original question.

Because people are wrong.

It is not a subjective thing. Keyboard and mouse offers a faster and more accurate input.

There's no debate to this.

Some games "Feel" better with a controller. It's subjective. And that's fine, if you prefer it, that's not an issue, nor are you somehow "Inferior" for liking it.

But, it's incorrect to think it's faster or more accurate in any capacity.

From a purely technical point of view, a keyboard and mouse is better.
A mouse is technically better, but a keyboard gives you less freedom of movement (8 directions) than an analogue stick (360 degrees).
 

Cerebrawl

New member
Feb 19, 2014
459
0
0
SmallHatLogan said:
A mouse is technically better, but a keyboard gives you less freedom of movement (8 directions) than an analogue stick (360 degrees).
Mouse + flightstick, best of both worlds. ;)
 

Aaron Sylvester

New member
Jul 1, 2012
786
0
0
FPS, RTS, MMO, RPG (depends), 2D Fighters - keyboard+mouse
Driving/Racing, RPG (depends), PS1/PS2 emulations - gamepad

That's right, I personally find 2D fighters significantly easier to play with a keyboard. Many of them revolve around rapidly inputting specific directions, and a d-pad (or stick) controlled by 1 thumb is always going to be inferior to 4 independent fingers ready to hit all directions. Hence Hitbox was invented:



The only limitation to this is playing characters that require 360/720-degree directional inputs (e.g. Zangief from Street Fighter) for which an analog stick is hands-down necessary.
 

AmtracZac

New member
Jun 12, 2013
2
0
0
I've played a lot of both Console and PC. I started out on PC, went to Consoles with the PS1 and now I'm beginning to make my way back again. I, personally, prefer a Mouse & Keyboard over a Controller (Though there are exceptions, of course, like fighting games). I couldn't, for the life of me, tell you why I do. I've just found it feels better to me.
 

azurine

New member
Jan 20, 2011
234
0
0
I admit it's great for First Person Shooters (and maybe RTS games, but I've never played any), but for everything else, it's just not comfortable. A lot of games are made with controllers in mind anyway.

Again, great for FPS games, but practically everything else is a hand-cramping joke.
 

ngl42398

New member
May 19, 2011
50
0
0
This is an incredibly situational subject. On the subject of First Person Shooters, KB+M is objectively better. Objectively. There are also several genres which only work with KB+M. Have you ever tried playing a 4X game with a controller? Or a MOBA? Tell me how it goes.

However, keep in mind there are genres that are better on gamepad than controller. What specifically come to mind are Platformers(2D and 3D) and character-action/CUHRAZEE games. Fighting games, which do best on Arcade Sticks, are infinitely better than KB+M on controllers.

It really is dependent on the genre. But FPS games are objectively better on KB+M than controllers. Anyone who argues this is objectively wrong. I actually would love to see a Highlander TF2 match with 1 team on KB+M against 1 team on gamepads and watch how fucking stomped the gamepad team would get.
 

bartholen_v1legacy

A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
Jan 24, 2009
3,056
0
0
Because for some types of games they are better (action games like Devil May Cry, God of War and the like, fighting games, racing games etc.), just like KB+M is better for some types of games (shooters, RPGs, strategy games etc.)
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
What is broadly better isn't going to matter much to most. It's what they are are use to and is better for the games and style they like to play in. Some types of games are better with a controller and even for some genres that aren't but are still playable with one like FPS using a controller is more relaxed and using Kb & M only matters in a competitive scene.
 

Aesir23

New member
Jul 2, 2009
2,860
0
0
For me, I have a massive preference for Gamepads but it also depends on the game. For an RTS or some RPG games I prefer to use keyboards but for almost everything else I prefer gamepads. I think it's because I've been gaming on a console since I was but a wee lass but I find keyboards to be just too unwieldy when it comes to playing many of the genres I prefer or I just find the movement of a character more visually appealing on a controller. Yes, that's silly but it's also the reason I prefer analogue sticks for movement as opposed to using the directional buttons.

All in all, it's just a bunch of little preferences that will change what a person will choose to use. Some might view something as inherently "better" and maybe, objectively, it is but it doesn't mean much if that isn't what another person prefers to use.
 

DanielBrown

Dangerzone!
Dec 3, 2010
3,837
0
0
I've often felt third person-camera games are awkward with a keyboard. Dark Souls, Sleeping Dogs, Kingdom of Amalur were all awful to play. Managed to learn with Dark souls, but it was still better with gamepad.
First person games however are definetly superior with keyboard and mouse since you often need good precision.
 

ivarsa15

New member
Nov 21, 2009
56
0
0
I use both. Some games are just better suited for gamepads and others are better suited for kbm.
 

TrevHead

New member
Apr 10, 2011
1,458
0
0
I play with all controller types and every controller is valid as long as the game is designed well and is a good fit. I find it quite sad that there are big swathes of the gaming community out there who play all their games on KB&M or pad and won't put in the effort to learn other control types even if it will enhance their gaming experience in the long run.

IE playing Dark Souls or DMC with M&K or avoiding modern racing games because they use analog accell / braking. Or pad users tying to compete in MP PC FPS and not been able to win a match.
 

Mad World

Member
Legacy
Sep 18, 2009
795
0
1
Country
Canada
otakon17 said:
Doesn't matter to the controller user. The keyboard is just too foreign a thing to use to get used to using it for PC is all there is to it. I grew up on controllers, from the NES to The Duke and beyond.
You could get used to it. I also grew up on controllers.
 

Artaneius

New member
Dec 9, 2013
255
0
0
I find it more hilarious how people still claim that controllers are equal to or better than m/kb. Just watch these two videos that absolutely proves that players with m/kb have a HUGE advantage over players that use controllers. It's two Quake Live matches that proves without a shadow of a doubt that controllers can't keep up with players who use m/kb. The second video is so brutal with the constant humiliations... makes my pc elitism on the inside cry out with pride.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJN1VvfHO4M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF5hqdc510g

I'm sorry, but this is definitive proof by using the most skilled FPS in shooter history that controllers are garbage compared to M/KB. Except for platformers and Fighters.
 

Mir Teiwaz

New member
May 11, 2014
7
0
0
Artaneius said:
I find it more hilarious how people still claim that controllers are equal to or better than m/kb. Just watch these two videos that absolutely proves that players with m/kb have a HUGE advantage over players that use controllers. It's two Quake Live matches that proves without a shadow of a doubt that controllers can't keep up with players who use m/kb. The second video is so brutal with the constant humiliations... makes my pc elitism on the inside cry out with pride.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJN1VvfHO4M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF5hqdc510g

I'm sorry, but this is definitive proof by using the most skilled FPS in shooter history that controllers are garbage compared to M/KB. Except for platformers and Fighters.
Now show me an example that doesn't involve a first person shooter or RTS.