I just don't get it. I've seen people criticise the movie because of it's overuse of CGI (though to be honest, it wasn't even the worst offender the year it came out, and prequel lovers don't seem to mind), being too colourful, cheesy dialogue and a plot which you would expect from a cartoon.
But the thing is, it's an adaptation of a 60s cartoon with a lot of colour, cheesy dialogue, nonsensical plots and a dub that's so bad it's good. So what exactly where people expecting? Half the reasons I've seen listed for why it's bad are what (in my eyes) make it work.
Am I just weird, or where the critics wrong?
But the thing is, it's an adaptation of a 60s cartoon with a lot of colour, cheesy dialogue, nonsensical plots and a dub that's so bad it's good. So what exactly where people expecting? Half the reasons I've seen listed for why it's bad are what (in my eyes) make it work.
Am I just weird, or where the critics wrong?