RAKtheUndead post=9.72769.772926 said:
Lucas113 post=9.72769.772422 said:
NTSC and PAL is something slightly different - they are the video standards for North America and Europe respectively. The main difference is NTSC runs at 60Hz, while PAL is down at 50Hz.
EDIT: There is also some difference in the colour technology, meaning a 60Hz source is sometimes monochrome on old PAL (50Hz) TVs.
You forgot the other element of the whole PAL vs. NTSC thing - PAL has a higher resolution to make up for that slower refresh rate. You damned Americans just had to hold onto your archaic system - there's a reason why people remark that NTSC stands for "Never The Same Colour" - didn't you?
Technically, since it's an American specification, I'd argue it's "Never the same Color" (No extra U's for me!)
SO here's the thing. America has widespread black and white broadcast before the invention of the color TV, which most of Europe did not. Therefore, when creating the specification for color broadcast, it had to remain compatable with older black and white TVs. They decided that it would have a black and white broadcast that would double as the luminescence for color, and paint over the top.
PAL (Phase alternate line) did not have the problem of having to be backwards compatable, and therefore doesn't suffer the same fuzziness and inaccurate color representation of NTSC.
This is all moot in less than a year, though, as all OTA bradcast in the USA will switch to ATSC for digital HD, which I can only assume means "Always the same color"
(Posted with accurate information, though tongue very much in cheek)