Particularly irritating to me is the readiness of some to condemn criticism as 'entitlement'.
For clarity, I'll be using the Oxford dictionary's definition of 'entitlement', which is as follows.
By the very fact of purchasing a game, I am entitled to its contents. That includes an entitlement to the game as described and depicted in promotional material.
If I don't get what is promised to me in the near-sacred bond that is the cornerstone of capitalist civilization, the bond between customer and provider, it is my duty to warn others of this fact.
It seems PC gamers are expected to be venture investors in new games, being egged on to support games regardless of whether they merit such support, this is evident in the recent case of Dark Souls for PC. Seemingly prevalent is the attitude that we should simultaneously;
a.) Support the product by buying it (whether or not we like it, in the hopes of a better future product.)
b.) Refrain from the criticism that is a right of investors and shareholders.
If we don't do both, we are automatically branded as entitled, elitist jerks. I wonder how many thousands of times those words, in that order, have been used to demonize and marginalize PC gamers with legitimate concerns.
So yep, I'm entitled as they come, and I'm proud of it.
For clarity, I'll be using the Oxford dictionary's definition of 'entitlement', which is as follows.
Given that paying customers are in fact by legal definition entitled, I think it's time people start using the term in its proper context.Definition of entitlement
noun
the fact of having a right to something: "full entitlement to fees and maintenance should be offered", "you should be fully aware of your legal entitlements"
the amount to which a person has a right: annual leave entitlement
By the very fact of purchasing a game, I am entitled to its contents. That includes an entitlement to the game as described and depicted in promotional material.
If I don't get what is promised to me in the near-sacred bond that is the cornerstone of capitalist civilization, the bond between customer and provider, it is my duty to warn others of this fact.
It seems PC gamers are expected to be venture investors in new games, being egged on to support games regardless of whether they merit such support, this is evident in the recent case of Dark Souls for PC. Seemingly prevalent is the attitude that we should simultaneously;
a.) Support the product by buying it (whether or not we like it, in the hopes of a better future product.)
b.) Refrain from the criticism that is a right of investors and shareholders.
If we don't do both, we are automatically branded as entitled, elitist jerks. I wonder how many thousands of times those words, in that order, have been used to demonize and marginalize PC gamers with legitimate concerns.
So yep, I'm entitled as they come, and I'm proud of it.